Development strategies of an intelligent human-machine interface for next generation nuclear power plants

An intelligent human-machine interface (HMI) has been developed to enhance the safety and availability of a nuclear power plant (NPP) by improving operational reliability. The key elements of the proposed HMI are the large display panels that present synopsis of the plant status and the compact, digital workstations for monitoring, control, and protection functions: The workstation consists of four consoles such as a dynamic alarm console (DAC), a system information console (SIC), a computerized operating-procedure console (COC), and a safety-related information console (SRIC). The DAC provides clean alarm pictures in which information overlapping is excluded and alarm impacts are discriminated for quick situation awareness. The SIC supports a normal operation by offering all necessary system information and control functions. In addition, it is closely linked to automatically display the related system information according to situations of the DAC and the COC. The COC aids the operator with proper emergency operation guidelines so as to shutdown the plant safely, and it also reduces his physical/mental burden by tracing the operating procedures automatically. The SRIC continuously displays safety-related information so that the operator can assess the plant status focusing on plant safety. The proposed HMI has been validated and demonstrated using the full-scope simulator for Yonggwang Units 1, 2. From the demonstration results, it can be concluded that the HMI enables the operator to terminate or mitigate plant disturbances early. After sufficient validation, the characteristic design features of the proposed HMI will be reflected in the main control room for the Korean next generation NPP's.

[1]  Z. A. Sabri,et al.  Operating procedure automation to enhance safety of nuclear power plants , 1989 .

[2]  W E Gilmore.  HUMAN ENGINEERING GUIDELINES FOR THE EVALUATION AND ASSESSMENT OF VIDEO DISPLAY UNITS , 1985 .

[3]  Norio Naito,et al.  Intelligent alarm-processing system for nuclear power plants , 1995 .

[4]  Sandro Bologna,et al.  Improving safety through an integrated approach for advanced control room development , 1992 .

[5]  Zita Vale,et al.  An expert system with temporal reasoning for alarm processing in power system control centers , 1993 .

[6]  Don W. Miller,et al.  An integrated operator advisor system for plant monitoring, procedure management, and diagnosis , 1990 .

[7]  Soon-Heung Chang,et al.  Development of an expert system for failure diagnosis of primary side systems , 1992 .

[8]  Jens Rasmussen,et al.  Skills, rules, and knowledge; signals, signs, and symbols, and other distinctions in human performance models , 1983, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.

[9]  J.M. O'Hara,et al.  Advanced control rooms and crew performance issues: implications for human reliability , 1991, Conference Record of the 1991 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium and Medical Imaging Conference.

[10]  Juichiro Itoh,et al.  An intelligent man-machine system for future nuclear power plants , 1994 .

[11]  Soon Heung Chang,et al.  Development of the on-line operator aid system OASYS using a rule-based expert system and fuzzy logic for nuclear power plants , 1995 .

[12]  M. A. Ross,et al.  Control Room Design And Automationin the advanced BWR(ABWR) , 1990, 1990 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record.

[13]  Soon Heung Chang,et al.  Development of an on-line fuzzy expert system for integrated alarm processing in nuclear power plants , 1995 .

[14]  Inn Seock Kim.  Computerized systems for on-line management of failures: a state-of-the-art discussion of alarm systems and diagnostic systems applied in the nuclear industry , 1994 .