Anatomic indicators (histologic and cytologic) of increased breast cancer risk

SummaryAnatomic indicators of increased breast cancer risk have regularly been identified as hyperplastic lesions, analogous to other body sites. Most of these have been shown to indicate a later increased risk anywhere in either breast and should thus be regarded as indicators or markers of increased risk. Unfortunately, these are largely identified incidentally to current methods of detection. Specific combined histologic and cytologic criteria for the definition of these lesions have been evaluated for both their reproducibility of diagnosis and outcome variables. Several studies agree that usual patterns of hyperplasia of at least moderate degree indicate an increased risk of later breast carcinoma between 1.5 and 2 times that of the general population. The specifically defined examples of atypical hyperplasia, lesions of relative rarity, are found in 4–5% of biopsies (depending upon method of detection) and recognize a risk in the range of 4–5 times that of the general population controlled for age and duration of follow-up. Thus, several cohort studies using comparable criteria for definition of the anatomic lesions have found similar clinical outcomes.Other approaches to histologic definition have produced a lesser degree of separation between the non “atypical” and other forms of hyperplasia. Although it is not clear whether we are dealing with continuous variables or discrete histologic/cytologic variables, it is clear that when combined criteria are used, a greater degree of predictability is obtained.Other related risk features include most predominantly family history, which when present with atypical hyperplasia indicates an increased risk beyond that of either alone. Other means of detection of these various lesions, such as fine needle aspiration cytology, have not been verified.True non-obligate precursors of breast cancer are probably confined to low grade and non-comedo ductal carcinomas of the breast.

[1]  W. Dupont,et al.  Relative risk of breast cancer varies with time since diagnosis of atypical hyperplasia. , 1989, Human pathology.

[2]  C. Bodian,et al.  Prognostic significance of benign proliferative breast disease , 1993, Cancer.

[3]  David L. Page,et al.  Atypical hyperplastic lesions of the female breast. A long‐term follow‐up study , 1985, Cancer.

[4]  D. Visscher,et al.  Proliferative disease and atypia in biopsies performed for nonpalpable lesions detected mammographically , 1988, Cancer.

[5]  W. Dupont Converting relative risks to absolute risks: A graphical approach , 1989 .

[6]  F. Berrino,et al.  Long-term follow-up of in situ carcinoma of the breast with special emphasis on clinging carcinoma. , 1989, Seminars in diagnostic pathology.

[7]  A. Patchefsky,et al.  Subclinical ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast: Treatment by local excision and surveillance alone , 1992, Cancer.

[8]  U. Chetty,et al.  Noninvasive ductal carcinoma of the breast: the relevance of histologic categorization. , 1993, Human pathology.

[9]  W D Dupont,et al.  Risk factors for breast cancer in women with proliferative breast disease. , 1985, The New England journal of medicine.

[10]  S J Schnitt,et al.  Interobserver Reproducibility in the Diagnosis of Ductal Proliferative Breast Lesions Using Standardized Criteria , 1992, The American journal of surgical pathology.

[11]  W. Dupont,et al.  Ductal involvement by cells of atypical lobular hyperplasia in the breast: a long-term follow-up study of cancer risk. , 1988, Human pathology.

[12]  C. Abendroth,et al.  Comparative features of carcinoma in situ and atypical ductal hyperplasia of the breast on fine-needle aspiration biopsy specimens. , 1991, American journal of clinical pathology.

[13]  W. Dupont,et al.  Intraductal carcinoma of the breast: Follow‐up after biopsy only , 1982, Cancer.

[14]  Kuzma Jf Carcinoma-in-situ of the breast. , 1969 .

[15]  F. W. Foote,et al.  Comparative Studies of Cancerous Versus Noncancerous Breasts. , 1945, Annals of surgery.

[16]  D. Page,et al.  Combined histologic and cytologic criteria for the diagnosis of mammary atypical ductal hyperplasia. , 1992, Human pathology.

[17]  W. Dupont,et al.  Lobular neoplasia of the breast: higher risk for subsequent invasive cancer predicted by more extensive disease. , 1991, Human pathology.

[18]  L. Brinton,et al.  Estrogen replacement therapy and breast cancer risk. , 1993, Epidemiologic reviews.

[19]  R. Greco,et al.  A reappraisal of prophylactic mastectomy. , 1990, Surgery, gynecology & obstetrics.

[20]  Carney Ja,et al.  Benign breast lesions and subsequent breast carcinoma in Rochester, Minnesota. , 1975 .

[21]  P. Rosen,et al.  Intraductal carcinoma. Long-term follow-up after treatment by biopsy alone. , 1978 .

[22]  P. Taylor,et al.  A prospective study of the development of breast cancer in 16,692 women with benign breast disease. , 1988, American journal of epidemiology.

[23]  R. Hutter,et al.  Lobular carcinoma in situ of the breast: clinical, pathologic, and mammographic features. , 1991, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[24]  W. Dupont,et al.  Invasive breast cancer risk in women with sclerosing adenosis , 1989, Cancer.

[25]  S. Bianchi,et al.  Benign breast disease and breast cancer: A case‐control study in a cohort in italy , 1991, International journal of cancer.

[26]  D. Page,et al.  The Patient at Risk for Breast Cancer: Pathologic and Surgical Considerations , 1988 .

[27]  C. Bodian,et al.  Lobular neoplasia (so‐called lobular carcinoma in situ) of the breast , 1978, Cancer.

[28]  S J London,et al.  A prospective study of benign breast disease and the risk of breast cancer. , 1992, JAMA.

[29]  F. Tavassoli,et al.  A comparison of the results of long‐term follow‐up for atypical intraductal hyperplasia and intraductal hyperplasia of the breast , 1990, Cancer.

[30]  M. Lagios Duct carcinoma in situ. Pathology and treatment. , 1990, The Surgical clinics of North America.

[31]  N. Boyd,et al.  Relationship between mammographic and histological risk factors for breast cancer. , 1992, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[32]  C. Wells,et al.  Spherical connective tissue inclusions in epithelial hyperplasia of the breast ("collagenous spherulosis"). , 1990, Journal of clinical pathology.

[33]  J. Peterse,et al.  Ductal carcinoma in-situ of the breast; second EORTC consensus meeting. , 1992, European journal of cancer.

[34]  D. Page,et al.  Relation between component parts of fibrocystic disease complex and breast cancer. , 1978, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[35]  M. Lagios,et al.  Mammographically detected duct carcinoma in situ. Frequency of local recurrence following tylectomy and prognostic effect of nuclear grade on local recurrence , 1989, Cancer.

[36]  N. Weidner,et al.  Lobular carcinoma in situ: mammographic-pathologic correlation of results of needle-directed biopsy. , 1991, Radiology.

[37]  W. Dupont,et al.  Influence of exogenous estrogens, proliferative breast disease, and other variables on breast cancer risk , 1989, Cancer.

[38]  D. Jicha,et al.  Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS): a revised concept. , 1987, Surgery.

[39]  P. Clement,et al.  Collagenous Spherulosis of the Breast , 1987, The American journal of surgical pathology.

[40]  N. Petrakis ASPO Distinguished Achievement Award Lecture. Studies on the epidemiology and natural history of benign breast disease and breast cancer using nipple aspirate fluid. , 1993, Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology.

[41]  B. Oberman,et al.  Significance of proliferative epithelial changes in breast fine‐needle aspiration , 1992, Cancer.

[42]  D. Kodlin,et al.  Chronic mastopathy and breast cancer: A Follow‐Up Study , 1977, Cancer.

[43]  M. Stanley,et al.  Atypia in breast fine-needle aspiration smears correlates poorly with the presence of a prognostically significant proliferative lesion of ductal epithelium. , 1993, Human pathology.

[44]  P. Wingo,et al.  Histologic types of benign breast disease and the risk for breast cancer , 1992, Cancer.

[45]  Godfrey Se Is 'fibrocystic disease' of the breast precancerous? , 1986, Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine.

[46]  W. Dupont,et al.  Premalignant conditions and markers of elevated risk in the breast and their management. , 1990, The Surgical clinics of North America.

[47]  H M Jensen,et al.  An atlas of subgross pathology of the human breast with special reference to possible precancerous lesions. , 1975, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[48]  W. Dupont,et al.  Breast cancer risk of lobular-based hyperplasia after biopsy: "ductal" pattern lesions. , 1986, Cancer detection and prevention.

[49]  R. Hiatt,et al.  Risk of breast cancer after benign breast diseases. Variation by histologic type, degree of atypia, age at biopsy, and length of follow-up. , 1992, American journal of epidemiology.

[50]  L. Brinton,et al.  Breast cancer risk associated with proliferative breast disease and atypical hyperplasia , 1993, Cancer.

[51]  W. Dupont,et al.  Menopausal Estrogen Replacement Therapy and Breast Cancer , 1991, Archives of internal medicine.

[52]  W. Dupont,et al.  Anatomic markers of human premalignancy and risk of breast cancer , 1990, Cancer.

[53]  C. Kosloff,et al.  Lobular carcinoma in situ of the breast Detailed analysis of 99 patients with average follow‐up of 24 years , 1978, The American journal of surgical pathology.