Détection des oocystes de Cryptosporidium dans les fèces de caprins : comparaison entre un test d'agglutination au latex et trois autres techniques conventionnelles

Detection of Cryptosporidium oocysts from goat kid faeces: comparison of a latex agglutination test with three other conventional techniques. A quantitative latex agglutination test (QLAT) with monoclonal antibodies for the detection of Cryptosporidium oocysts in faeces was compared with 3 other conventional techniques: Heine staining on faecal smears (HS) giving semi-quantitative results (scores from 1 to 5), sucrose flotation on diluted faeces (SF) with results ex- pressed in oocysts/g of faeces (opg), direct ELISA (DE) giving qualitative results. Goat kid unconcentrated faecal samples (234) from 8 farms were processed according to the 4 techniques. Data were analyzed with Win Episcope 1.0 and Testview 1.1 softwares. The oocyst outputs ranged from 100 000 (detection limit for SF) to 200 millions opg (mean: 15.2 millions opg). A very good agreement was recorded between QLAT and HS, SF, DE: Kappa values ranged between 0.82 and 0.90. When considering the samples exhibiting oocysts (or not) as positive (or negative) using both HS and SF (n = 219), the sensitivity and specificity of QLAT were respectively 95.1 and 96.0%. The lack of sensitivity was observed in faeces harboring a few oocysts (≤ 200 000 opg, scores ≤ 2) whereas the lack of specificity was only observed in 3 samples originating from the same farm. A sig- nificant correlation was calculated between the percentage of agglutination in QLAT and the number of oocysts in SF or scores in HS (Spearman correlation ranging from 0.45 to 0.48, p < 0.001). QLAT is a rapid, simple and reliable tool for routine detection of Cryptosporidium oocysts in faeces.

[1]  C. Chartier,et al.  EFFICACITE DU LACTATE D'HALOFUGINONE DANS LA PREVENTION DE LA CRYPTOSPORIDIOSE CHEZ LE CHEVREAU NOUVEAU-NE , 1999 .

[2]  L. Robertson,et al.  Detection of Cryptosporidium parvum oocysts in faeces: comparison of conventional coproscopical methods and the polymerase chain reaction. , 1996, Veterinary parasitology.

[3]  E. Greiner,et al.  Patterns of Cryptosporidium oocyst shedding in calves and a comparison of two diagnostic methods. , 1995, Veterinary parasitology.

[4]  C. Chartier,et al.  Chemoprophylaxis of Cryptosporidium parvum infection with paromomycin in kids and immunological study , 1995, Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy.

[5]  R. Herd,et al.  Infection pattern of Cryptosporidium and Giardia in calves. , 1994, Veterinary parasitology.

[6]  I. Gardner,et al.  TESTVIEW: a spreadsheet program for evaluation and interpretation of diagnostic tests , 1993 .

[7]  R. Guerrant,et al.  Evaluation of an antigen capture enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for detection of Cryptosporidium oocysts , 1993, Journal of clinical microbiology.

[8]  J. Sullivan,et al.  Threshold of detection of Cryptosporidium oocysts in human stool specimens: evidence for low sensitivity of current diagnostic methods , 1991, Journal of clinical microbiology.

[9]  D. Casemore ACP Broadsheet 128: June 1991. Laboratory methods for diagnosing cryptosporidiosis. , 1991, Journal of clinical pathology.

[10]  A. Ginter,et al.  Diagnosis of bovine cryptosporidiosis by an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay , 1990, Veterinary Parasitology.

[11]  J. Noordhuizen,et al.  EPISCOPE: computer programs in veterinary epidemiology , 1990, Veterinary Record.