Pollinator webs, plant communities and the conservation of rare plants: arable weeds as a case study

Summary 1 Little is known about the pollinators of rare plants, which is cause for concern given that pollination is essential for the long-term survival of most plant species. The aim of this study was to determine the probable pollinators of three species of rare arable weed: red hemp-nettle Galeopsis angustifolia, small-flowered catchfly Silene gallica and spreading hedge-parsley Torilis arvensis. Species of arable weed are among those suffering the greatest declines in the UK. 2 Five field sites were chosen, two of which were sampled in 2 years. Visitation and pollen transport webs were constructed for the entire plant–pollinator community at each site. Visitation webs described the frequency with which each insect species visited each plant species. Pollen transport webs quantified which insect species transported the pollen of which plant species. 3 A wide range of insect species visited the three plant species. A pollinator importance index was calculated that combined information on both the relative abundance of each insect carrying the pollen of the rare plant and its pollen fidelity. Using this method Galeopsis angustifolia was most likely to be pollinated by Bombus pascuorum at one site and Sphaerophoria scripta at another. Silene gallica was also likely be pollinated by Sphaerophoria scripta. 4 The pollinator fauna of the three plant species varied considerably across their geographical range, but less from one year to the next. 5 Synthesis and applications. All three species of rare plant were linked to other plant species in the community by shared pollinators. In many cases these other plant species constituted the primary food sources for the shared pollinators. Therefore, the long-term survival of rare plant populations is likely to depend on the more common plant species in the community. We recommend that management of the rare plants studied here should also include the protection and management of populations of some of the more common plant species in their respective communities.

[1]  Beatriz Arroyo,et al.  A review of the abundance and diversity of invertebrate and plant foods of granivorous birds in northern europe in relation to agricultural change , 1999 .

[2]  C. Wilcock,et al.  Pollination failure in plants: why it happens and when it matters. , 2002, Trends in plant science.

[3]  A. Dafni.  Pollination ecology: a practical approach. , 1994 .

[4]  Stephen T. Buckland,et al.  Trends in the abundance of farmland birds: a quantitative comparison of smoothed Common Birds Census indices , 1998 .

[5]  R. O'Neill,et al.  The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital , 1997, Nature.

[6]  P. Wilson,et al.  Arable plants : a field guide , 2003 .

[7]  P. Marren.  Britain's Rare Flowers , 2005 .

[8]  William J. Bond,et al.  Do mutualisms matter? Assessing the impact of pollinator and disperser disruption on plant extinction , 1994 .

[9]  D. Inouye,et al.  Pollinators, Flowering Plants, and Conservation Biology , 1997 .

[10]  William J. Sutherland,et al.  Predicting the response of farmland bird populations to changing food supplies , 2003 .

[11]  M. Whittingham,et al.  Stubble height affects the use of stubble fields by farmland birds , 2005 .

[12]  L. K. Ward,et al.  The role of weeds in supporting biological diversity within crop fields , 2003 .

[13]  Marcelo A. Aizen,et al.  Forest Fragmentation, Pollination, and Plant Reproduction in a Chaco Dry Forest, Argentina , 1994 .

[14]  T. Dines,et al.  New atlas of the British and Irish flora. An atlas of the vascular plants of Britain, Ireland, the Isle of Man and the Channel Islands. , 2002 .

[15]  Pedro Jordano,et al.  Patterns of Mutualistic Interactions in Pollination and Seed Dispersal: Connectance, Dependence Asymmetries, and Coevolution , 1987, The American Naturalist.

[16]  W. Sutherland,et al.  Post‐war changes in arable farming and biodiversity in Great Britain , 2002 .

[17]  T. Spira.  Plant-pollinator interactions: A threatened mutualism with implications for the ecology and management of rare plants , 2001 .

[18]  M. V. Price,et al.  Exploring the ‘Most Effective Pollinator Principle’ with Complex Flowers: Bumblebees and Ipomopsis aggregata , 2001 .

[19]  R. Primack,et al.  Measuring the relative importance of different pollinators to plants , 1975, Nature.

[20]  N. Waser.  Interspecific pollen transfer and competition between co-occurring plant species , 2004, Oecologia.

[21]  C. Horvitz,et al.  Variation Among Floral Visitors in Pollination Ability: A Precondition for Mutualism Specialization , 1984, Science.

[22]  P. Feinsinger.  ECOLOGICAL INTERACTIONS BETWEEN PLANTS AND HUMMINGBIRDS IN A SUCCESSIONAL TROPICAL COMMUNITY , 1978 .

[23]  R. Frankl,et al.  Are forests potential landscape barriers for foraging bumblebees? Landscape scale experiments with Bombus terrestris agg. and Bombus pascuorum (Hymenoptera, Apidae) , 2004 .

[24]  L. Real,et al.  Effective mutualism between sequentially flowering plant species , 1979, Nature.

[25]  Lynn V. Dicks,et al.  Compartmentalization in plant–insect flower visitor webs , 2002 .

[26]  C. Stace,et al.  New Flora Of The British Isles , 1998 .

[27]  Lars Chittka,et al.  Generalization in Pollination Systems, and Why it Matters , 1996 .

[28]  J. Thomson,et al.  Pollen removal and deposition by honeybee and bumblebee visitors to apple and almond flowers , 2001 .

[29]  L. Chittka,et al.  Successful invasion of a floral market , 2001, Nature.

[30]  David W. Inouye,et al.  ENDANGERED MUTUALISMS: The Conservation of Plant-Pollinator Interactions , 1998 .

[31]  D. L. Venable,et al.  Diversity and temporal change in the effective pollinators of Asclepias tuberosa , 1996 .

[32]  Anne H. Lindsey.  REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY OF APIACEAE. I. FLORAL VISITORS TO THASPIUM AND ZIZIA AND THEIR IMPORTANCE IN POLLINATION , 1984 .

[33]  Pedro Jordano,et al.  GEOGRAPHIC PATTERNS IN PLANT–POLLINATOR MUTUALISTIC NETWORKS , 2002 .

[34]  B. Rathcke.  CHAPTER 12 – Competition and Facilitation among Plants for Pollination , 1983 .

[35]  G. Ledyard Stebbins,et al.  Adaptive Radiation of Reproductive Characteristics in Angiosperms, I: Pollination Mechanisms , 1970 .

[36]  Jane Memmott,et al.  Tolerance of pollination networks to species extinctions , 2004, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[37]  Don R. Reynolds,et al.  A landscape‐scale study of bumble bee foraging range and constancy, using harmonic radar , 1999 .

[38]  A. D. Fox.  Has Danish agriculture maintained farmland bird populations , 2004 .

[39]  R. Frankl,et al.  Foraging habitats and foraging distances of bumblebees, Bombus spp. (Hym., Apidae), in an agricultural landscape , 2000 .

[40]  R. O'Neill,et al.  The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital , 1997, Nature.

[41]  T. Rich,et al.  Changes in the vascular plant floras of England and Scotland between 1930–1960 and 1987–1988: The BSBI Monitoring Scheme , 1996 .

[42]  Teja Tscharntke,et al.  Fruit set of highland coffee increases with the diversity of pollinating bees , 2003, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[43]  J Memmott,et al.  The structure of a plant-pollinator food web. , 1999, Ecology letters.

[44]  S. Potts,et al.  A new pollination probability index (PPI) for pollen load analysis as a measure for pollination effectiveness of bees , 1999 .

[45]  M. Altieri.  The ecological role of biodiversity in agroecosystems , 1999 .