Direct methanol fuel cells: The effect of electrode fabrication procedure on MEAs structural properties and cell performance

In the present paper, the effect of electrode preparation procedure on the structural properties of membrane electrode assembly (MEA) and consequently on the performance of direct methanol fuel cells (DMFCs) was investigated. Commercial PtRu black anode catalyst and Pt black cathode catalyst were characterized by XRD in their initial form and in their intermediate and final states after each step involved in catalyst-coated membrane electrode preparation procedure by a decal transfer method (DTM). XRD results demonstrated that the DTM process has a significant effect on the catalyst structural properties, especially on the particle size of Pt black cathode catalyst. It is also discussed that among all the steps involved in the electrode fabrication procedure, catalyst ink preparation and high temperature transfer process are key factors affecting the particle size of Pt black catalyst. Furthermore, it was found that the maximum power density of the single DMFC using a MEA fabricated by the DTM, when air is used as oxidant, is more than two times greater than that of the cell using conventionally prepared MEA, and more than three times greater when pure oxygen is used as oxidant. This could be attributed to the easier mass transportation due to the thinner catalyst layer and the better contact between the catalyst layer and the electrolyte membrane in the former case, even if, according to in situ CO stripping voltammetry results in the fuel cell anode environment, the surface composition of PtRu anode has been changed.

[1]  Weijiang Zhou,et al.  Performance comparison of low-temperature direct alcohol fuel cells with different anode catalysts , 2004 .

[2]  Shimshon Gottesfeld,et al.  Electrocatalysis in direct methanol fuel cells: in-situ probing of PtRu anode catalyst surfaces , 2000 .

[3]  Chaoyang Wang,et al.  Development of high-power electrodes for a liquid-feed direct methanol fuel cell , 2003 .

[4]  W. Sugimoto,et al.  Size effects of platinum particles on the electro-oxidation of methanol in an aqueous solution of HClO4 , 2000 .

[5]  K. Kinoshita,et al.  Particle Size Effects for Oxygen Reduction on Highly Dispersed Platinum in Acid Electrolytes , 1990 .

[6]  John Davey,et al.  Recent advances in direct methanol fuel cells at Los Alamos National Laboratory , 2000 .

[7]  Yuko Aoyama,et al.  New Preparation Method for Polymer-Electrolyte Fuel-Cells , 1995 .

[8]  Zhaobin Wei,et al.  Influence of electrode structure on the performance of a direct methanol fuel cell , 2002 .

[9]  F. Hahn,et al.  On the structure effects of bimetallic PtRu electrocatalysts towards methanol oxidation , 2003 .

[10]  Keith Scott,et al.  Engineering aspects of the direct methanol fuel cell system , 1999 .

[11]  H. Gasteiger,et al.  Structure and Chemical Composition of a Supported Pt-Ru Electrocatalyst for Methanol Oxidation , 1995 .

[12]  F. Maillard,et al.  Oxygen electroreduction on carbon-supported platinum catalysts. Particle-size effect on the tolerance to methanol competition , 2002 .

[13]  A. Ohta,et al.  Improved Preparation Process of Very‐Low‐Platinum‐Loading Electrodes for Polymer Electrolyte Fuel Cells , 1998 .

[14]  Gregor Hoogers,et al.  Fuel Cell Technology Handbook , 2002 .

[15]  S. Srinivasan,et al.  International activities in DMFC R&D: status of technologies and potential applications , 2004 .

[16]  R. Behm,et al.  New PtRu Alloy Colloids as Precursors for Fuel Cell Catalysts , 2000 .

[17]  Shimshon Gottesfeld,et al.  High performance direct methanol polymer electrolyte fuel cells , 1996 .

[18]  R. Behm,et al.  Composition and activity of high surface area PtRu catalysts towards adsorbed CO and methanol electrooxidation: A DEMS study , 2002 .