Genome-wide Association Study of Postburn Scarring Identifies a Novel Protective Variant.

OBJECTIVE To identify genetic variants associated with the severity of postburn hypertrophic scarring (HTS) using a genome-wide approach. BACKGROUND Risk of severe postburn HTS is known to depend on race, but the genetic determinants of HTS are unknown. METHODS We conducted a genome-wide association study (GWAS) in a prospective cohort of adults admitted with deep-partial-thickness burns from 2007 through 2014. Scar severity was assessed over time using the Vancouver Scar Scale (VSS), and DNA was genotyped with a >500,000-marker array. We performed association testing of single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) with minor allele frequency (MAF) >0.01 using linear regression of VSS height score on genotype adjusted for patient and injury characteristics as well as population genetic structure. Array-wide significance was based on Bonferroni correction for multiple testing. RESULTS Of 538 patients (median age 40 years, median burn size 6.0% of body surface area), 71% were men and 76% were White. The mean VSS height score was 1.2 (range: 0-3). Of 289,639 SNPs tested, a variant in the CUB and Sushi multiple domains 1 (CSMD1) gene (rs11136645; MAF = 0.49), was significantly associated with decreased scar height (regression coefficient = -0.23, P = 7.9 × 10). CONCLUSIONS In the first published GWAS of HTS, we report that a common intronic variant in the CSMD1 gene is associated with reduced severity of postburn HTS. If this association is confirmed in an independent cohort, investigating the potential role of CSMD1 in wound healing may elucidate HTS pathophysiology.

[1]  K. Sakamoto,et al.  Mechanisms of axon regeneration and its inhibition: roles of sulfated glycans. , 2014, Archives of biochemistry and biophysics.

[2]  C. Hultman,et al.  Hypertrophic Burn Scar Management: What Does the Evidence Show? A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials , 2014, Annals of plastic surgery.

[3]  Eden R Martin,et al.  Exome sequencing of extended families with autism reveals genes shared across neurodevelopmental and neuropsychiatric disorders , 2014, Molecular Autism.

[4]  P. Muglia,et al.  Genome-wide association study of bipolar disorder in Canadian and UK populations corroborates disease loci including SYNE1 and CSMD1 , 2014, BMC Medical Genetics.

[5]  N. Gibran,et al.  Genetic Risk Factors for Hypertrophic Scar Development , 2013, Journal of burn care & research : official publication of the American Burn Association.

[6]  W. Jiang,et al.  The novel complement inhibitor human CUB and Sushi multiple domains 1 (CSMD1) protein promotes factor I‐mediated degradation of C4b and C3b and inhibits the membrane attack complex assembly , 2013, FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology.

[7]  Teri A. Manolio,et al.  Bringing genome-wide association findings into clinical use , 2013, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[8]  E. Tredget,et al.  The molecular mechanism of hypertrophic scar , 2013, Journal of Cell Communication and Signaling.

[9]  K. Jirström,et al.  Sushi domain‐containing protein 4 (SUSD4) inhibits complement by disrupting the formation of the classical C3 convertase , 2013, FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology.

[10]  Shu Guo,et al.  CSMD1 exhibits antitumor activity in A375 melanoma cells through activation of the Smad pathway , 2012, Apoptosis.

[11]  Kurt L. Johnson,et al.  Return to Work After Burn Injury: A Systematic Review , 2012, Journal of burn care & research : official publication of the American Burn Association.

[12]  M. Klein,et al.  Epidemiology and Impact of Scarring After Burn Injury: A Systematic Review of the Literature , 2012, Journal of burn care & research : official publication of the American Burn Association.

[13]  Vidar M. Steen,et al.  The Complement Control-Related Genes CSMD1 and CSMD2 Associate to Schizophrenia , 2011, Biological Psychiatry.

[14]  P. Tam,et al.  Extrinsic regulation of pluripotent stem cells , 2010, Nature.

[15]  D. Cooper Functional intronic polymorphisms: Buried treasure awaiting discovery within our genes , 2010, Human Genomics.

[16]  Kohei Miyazono,et al.  TGFβ signalling: a complex web in cancer progression , 2010, Nature Reviews Cancer.

[17]  V. Speirs,et al.  Loss of CSMD1 expression is associated with high tumour grade and poor survival in invasive ductal breast carcinoma , 2010, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.

[18]  F. Collins,et al.  Potential etiologic and functional implications of genome-wide association loci for human diseases and traits , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[19]  Tara L. Naylor,et al.  Characterization CSMD1 in a large set of primary lung, head and neck, breast and skin cancer tissues , 2009, Cancer biology & therapy.

[20]  Eytan Domany,et al.  Association of survival and disease progression with chromosomal instability: A genomic exploration of colorectal cancer , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[21]  Michael R. Johnson,et al.  Genome-wide association analysis of susceptibility and clinical phenotype in multiple sclerosis. , 2009, Human molecular genetics.

[22]  P. V. van Zuijlen,et al.  Potential cellular and molecular causes of hypertrophic scar formation. , 2009, Burns : journal of the International Society for Burn Injuries.

[23]  Hiroyuki Aburatani,et al.  Allelic imbalances and homozygous deletion on 8p23.2 for stepwise progression of hepatocarcinogenesis , 2009, Hepatology.

[24]  M. McCarthy,et al.  Genome-wide association studies for complex traits: consensus, uncertainty and challenges , 2008, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[25]  Randal L. Croshaw,et al.  Somatic mutations to CSMD1 in colorectal adenocarcinomas , 2008, Cancer biology & therapy.

[26]  Dario Gregori,et al.  Epidemiology and risk factors for pathologic scarring after burn wounds. , 2008, Archives of facial plastic surgery.

[27]  Manuel A. R. Ferreira,et al.  PLINK: a tool set for whole-genome association and population-based linkage analyses. , 2007, American journal of human genetics.

[28]  N. Gibran,et al.  Making sense of hypertrophic scar: a role for nerves , 2007, Wound repair and regeneration : official publication of the Wound Healing Society [and] the European Tissue Repair Society.

[29]  Paul Martin,et al.  The inflammation-fibrosis link? A Jekyll and Hyde role for blood cells during wound repair. , 2007, The Journal of investigative dermatology.

[30]  J. Moss,et al.  Complement Activation Contributes to Both Glomerular and Tubulointerstitial Damage in Adriamycin Nephropathy in Mice1 , 2006, The Journal of Immunology.

[31]  D. Reich,et al.  Principal components analysis corrects for stratification in genome-wide association studies , 2006, Nature Genetics.

[32]  T. Horan,et al.  CSMD1 Is a Novel Multiple Domain Complement-Regulatory Protein Highly Expressed in the Central Nervous System and Epithelial Tissues1 , 2006, The Journal of Immunology.

[33]  Bishara S Atiyeh,et al.  Keloid or Hypertrophic Scar: The Controversy: Review of the Literature , 2005, Annals of plastic surgery.

[34]  N. Gibran,et al.  Substance P Levels and Neutral Endopeptidase Activity in Acute Burn Wounds and Hypertrophic Scar , 2005, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[35]  M. Longaker,et al.  Applications of a Mouse Model of Calvarial Healing: Differences in Regenerative Abilities of Juveniles and Adults , 2004, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[36]  P. White,et al.  Exploring the psychosocial concerns of outpatients with disfiguring conditions. , 2003, Journal of wound care.

[37]  R. Uppaluri,et al.  Transcript map of the 8p23 putative tumor suppressor region. , 2001, Genomics.

[38]  M. Baryza,et al.  The Vancouver Scar Scale: an administration tool and its interrater reliability. , 1995, The Journal of burn care & rehabilitation.

[39]  P. Bork,et al.  The CUB domain. A widespread module in developmentally regulated proteins. , 1993, Journal of molecular biology.

[40]  A. Amoroso,et al.  The HLA-DRβ16 allogenotype constitutes a risk factor for hypertrophic scarring , 1990 .

[41]  E. Deitch,et al.  Hypertrophic burn scars: analysis of variables. , 1983, The Journal of trauma.