The role of brand name in customization decisions: a search vs experience perspective

Investigates the role of brand name in consumers' decision making during a customization process, and develops a conceptual understanding of the factors influencing the role of brand name from a “search vs experience” perspective. Addresses the strategic relationship of brand with perceived product/service/information preference match and the impact of preference match on consumer “willingness to pay for customization”. Brand name was found to be an important decision variable for customization in terms of getting a better preference match. Brand name still holds an important role on consumer communications, as was expected. Therefore, it is reasonable to believe that customization would not “commoditize” brands, but rather increase the effect of brand names in purchase decision making. High‐knowledge consumers reported stronger brand name effect in terms of its importance and usefulness in their decision making. The brand name effect varies across product categories, and the effect is stronger in the customization of search products than that in experience products. Thus, brand names have greater impact on choices in a search product where less total quality information on components is available for facilitating consumer choices. Discusses managerial implications of the study's findings.

[1]  Peter R. Dickson,et al.  Buyer Uncertainty and Information Search , 1989 .

[2]  M. J. Houston,et al.  Goal-Oriented Experiences and the Development of Knowledge , 1993 .

[3]  L. Cronbach.  Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests , 1951 .

[4]  Allan D. Shocker,et al.  Managing Brand Equity , 1991 .

[5]  Robert F. DeVellis,et al.  Scale Development: Theory and Applications. , 1992 .

[6]  Jerry Wind,et al.  Customerization: The next revolution in mass customization , 2001 .

[7]  J. Nunnally.  Psychometric Theory (2nd ed), New York: McGraw-Hill. , 1978 .

[8]  R. Sitgreaves.  Psychometric theory (2nd ed.). , 1979 .

[9]  B. Ratchford.  The New Economic Theory of Consumer Behavior: An Interpretive Essay , 1975 .

[10]  J. W. Hutchinson,et al.  Dimensions of Consumer Expertise , 1987 .

[11]  J. Alba,et al.  Consumer Learning and Brand Equity , 2000 .

[12]  A. Rangaswamy,et al.  Consumer Choice Behavior in Online and Traditional Supermarkets: The Effects of Brand Name, Price, , 2000 .

[13]  Bruce G. S. Hardie,et al.  Watching Customers Decide: Process Measures Add Insights to Choice Modeling Experiments , 1997 .

[14]  Gabriel J. Biehal,et al.  Memory-Based Inferences during Consumer Choice , 1990 .

[15]  Allan D. Shocker,et al.  Toward understanding the attraction effect: The implications of product stimulus meaningfulness and familiarity. , 1987 .

[16]  J. Frank Yates,et al.  Customization Decisions: the Roles of Assortment and Consideration , 2001 .

[17]  K. Lancaster.  A New Approach to Consumer Theory , 1966, Journal of Political Economy.

[18]  B. Kahn.  Dynamic relationships with customers: High-variety strategies , 1998 .

[19]  B. Ratchford.  Cost-Benefit Models for Explaining Consumer Choice and Information Seeking Behavior , 1982 .

[20]  Kevin Lane Keller.  Conceptualizing, Measuring, and Managing Customer-Based Brand Equity , 1993 .

[21]  Eric J. Johnson,et al.  Divide and Prosper: Consumers’ Reactions to Partitioned Prices , 1998 .

[22]  J. Wesley Hutchinson,et al.  On the Locus of Range Effects in Judgment and Choice , 1983 .

[23]  C. Fornell,et al.  Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. , 1981 .

[24]  Noel Capon,et al.  Cognitive Algebra in Multi-Attribute Attitude Models , 1975 .