Feasibility of In-Home Sensor Monitoring to Detect Mild Cognitive Impairment in Aging Military Veterans: Prospective Observational Study

Background Aging military veterans are an important and growing population who are at an elevated risk for developing mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and Alzheimer dementia, which emerge insidiously and progress gradually. Traditional clinic-based assessments are administered infrequently, making these visits less ideal to capture the earliest signals of cognitive and daily functioning decline in older adults. Objective This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility of a novel ecologically valid assessment approach that integrates passive in-home and mobile technologies to assess instrumental activities of daily living (IADLs) that are not well captured by clinic-based assessment methods in an aging military veteran sample. Methods Participants included 30 community-dwelling military veterans, classified as healthy controls (mean age 72.8, SD 4.9 years; n=15) or MCI (mean age 74.3, SD 6.0 years; n=15) using the Clinical Dementia Rating Scale. Participants were in relatively good health (mean modified Cumulative Illness Rating Scale score 23.1, SD 2.9) without evidence of depression (mean Geriatrics Depression Scale score 1.3, SD 1.6) or anxiety (mean generalized anxiety disorder questionnaire 1.3, SD 1.3) on self-report measures. Participants were clinically assessed at baseline and 12 months later with health and daily function questionnaires and neuropsychological testing. Daily computer use, medication taking, and physical activity and sleep data were collected via passive computer monitoring software, an instrumented pillbox, and a fitness tracker watch in participants’ environments for 12 months between clinical study visits. Results Enrollment began in October 2018 and continued until the study groups were filled in January 2019. A total of 201 people called to participate following public posting and focused mailings. Most common exclusionary criteria included nonveteran status 11.4% (23/201), living too far from the study site 9.4% (19/201), and having exclusionary health concerns 17.9% (36/201). Five people have withdrawn from the study: 2 with unanticipated health conditions, 2 living in a vacation home for more than half of the year, and 1 who saw no direct benefit from the research study. At baseline, MCI participants had lower Montreal Cognitive Assessment (P<.001) and higher Functional Activities Questionnaire (P=.04) scores than healthy controls. Over seven months, research personnel visited participants’ homes a total of 73 times for technology maintenance. Technology maintenance visits were more prevalent for MCI participants (P=.04) than healthy controls. Conclusions Installation and longitudinal deployment of a passive in-home IADL monitoring platform with an older adult military veteran sample was feasible. Knowledge gained from this pilot study will be used to help develop acceptable and effective home-based assessment tools that can be used to passively monitor cognition and daily functioning in older adult samples.

[1]  Adriana M. Seelye,et al.  Feasibility of In-Home Sensor Monitoring to Detect Mild Cognitive Impairment in Aging Military Veterans: Prospective Observational Study (Preprint) , 2019 .

[2]  Paul A. Harris,et al.  The REDCap consortium: Building an international community of software platform partners , 2019, J. Biomed. Informatics.

[3]  Sylvain Giroux,et al.  Early Detection of Mild Cognitive Impairment With In-Home Monitoring Sensor Technologies Using Functional Measures: A Systematic Review , 2019, IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics.

[4]  Alzheimer's Association∗ 2019 Alzheimer's disease facts and figures , 2019, Alzheimer's & Dementia.

[5]  Liv Halvorsrud,et al.  Usability and acceptability of technology for community-dwelling older adults with mild cognitive impairment and dementia: a systematic literature review , 2018, Clinical interventions in aging.

[6]  Thomas C. Riley,et al.  Weekly observations of online survey metadata obtained through home computer use allow for detection of changes in everyday cognition before transition to mild cognitive impairment , 2018, Alzheimer's & Dementia.

[7]  M. Weiner,et al.  Dementia Risk in Posttraumatic Stress Disorder: the Relevance of Sleep-Related Abnormalities in Brain Structure, Amyloid, and Inflammation , 2017, Current Psychiatry Reports.

[8]  R. Kane,et al.  Societal and Family Lifetime Cost of Dementia: Implications for Policy , 2017, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society.

[9]  J. Kaye,et al.  THE SURVEY FOR MEMORY, ATTENTION, AND REACTION TIME (SMART): A BRIEF ONLINE PERSONAL COMPUTING-BASED COGNITIVE ASSESSMENT FOR HEALTHY AGING AND MILD COGNITIVE IMPAIRMENT , 2017, Alzheimer's & Dementia.

[10]  D. Harvey,et al.  Early Functional Limitations in Cognitively Normal Older Adults Predict Diagnostic Conversion to Mild Cognitive Impairment , 2017, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society.

[11]  D. Harvey,et al.  Progression from normal cognition to mild cognitive impairment in a diverse clinic-based and community-based elderly cohort , 2017, Alzheimer's & Dementia.

[12]  Nora Mattek,et al.  Variability in medication taking is associated with cognitive performance in nondemented older adults , 2017, Alzheimer's & dementia.

[13]  Daniel Austin,et al.  Embedded Online Questionnaire Measures Are Sensitive to Identifying Mild Cognitive Impairment , 2016, Alzheimer disease and associated disorders.

[14]  Adriana M. Seelye,et al.  Computer mouse movement patterns: A potential marker of mild cognitive impairment , 2015, Alzheimer's & dementia.

[15]  Adriana M. Seelye,et al.  Pervasive Computing Technologies to Continuously Assess Alzheimer’s Disease Progression and Intervention Efficacy , 2015, Front. Aging Neurosci..

[16]  Magda Tsolaki,et al.  Mild cognitive impairment and deficits in instrumental activities of daily living: a systematic review , 2015, Alzheimer's Research & Therapy.

[17]  A. Vincent,et al.  Cognitive changes and dementia risk after traumatic brain injury: Implications for aging military personnel , 2014, Alzheimer's & Dementia.

[18]  M. Carrillo,et al.  Alzheimer's Disease prevalence, costs, and prevention for military personnel and veterans , 2014, Alzheimer's & Dementia.

[19]  K. Yaffe,et al.  Lifestyle and health-related risk factors and risk of cognitive aging among older veterans , 2014, Alzheimer's & Dementia.

[20]  Mark W. Bondi,et al.  Mild Cognitive Impairment: A Concept and Diagnostic Entity in Need of Input from Neuropsychology , 2014, Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society.

[21]  M. Weiner,et al.  Military risk factors for Alzheimer's disease , 2013, Alzheimer's & Dementia.

[22]  C. Rowe,et al.  Amyloid β deposition, neurodegeneration, and cognitive decline in sporadic Alzheimer's disease: a prospective cohort study , 2013, The Lancet Neurology.

[23]  D. Salmon,et al.  The Multilingual Naming Test in Alzheimer's Disease: Clues to the Origin of Naming Impairments , 2013, Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society.

[24]  A. Wimo,et al.  The global prevalence of dementia: A systematic review and metaanalysis , 2013, Alzheimer's & Dementia.

[25]  D. A. Gold,et al.  An examination of instrumental activities of daily living assessment in older adults and mild cognitive impairment , 2012, Journal of clinical and experimental neuropsychology.

[26]  D. Harvey,et al.  The measurement of everyday cognition: Development and validation of a short form of the Everyday Cognition scales , 2011, Alzheimer's & Dementia.

[27]  T. Gollan,et al.  Self-ratings of spoken language dominance: A Multilingual Naming Test (MINT) and preliminary norms for young and aging Spanish–English bilinguals* , 2011, Bilingualism: Language and Cognition.

[28]  M. Pavel,et al.  Intelligent Systems For Assessing Aging Changes: home-based, unobtrusive, and continuous assessment of aging. , 2011, The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences.

[29]  Bruce L. Miller,et al.  Distinct neuroanatomical substrates and cognitive mechanisms of figure copy performance in Alzheimer's disease and behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia , 2011, Neuropsychologia.

[30]  Kathleen Baynes,et al.  The measurement of everyday cognition (ECog): scale development and psychometric properties. , 2008, Neuropsychology.

[31]  J. Morris,et al.  The Uniform Data Set (UDS): Clinical and Cognitive Variables and Descriptive Data From Alzheimer Disease Centers , 2006, Alzheimer disease and associated disorders.

[32]  S. Iliffe,et al.  Performance of an abbreviated version of the Lubben Social Network Scale among three European community-dwelling older adult populations. , 2006, The Gerontologist.

[33]  B. Löwe,et al.  A brief measure for assessing generalized anxiety disorder: the GAD-7. , 2006, Archives of internal medicine.

[34]  R. Noth,et al.  127 COMPUTER-BASED SCREENING OF VETERANS FOR METABOLIC SYNDROME. , 2006, Journal of Investigative Medicine.

[35]  J. Cummings,et al.  The Montreal Cognitive Assessment, MoCA: A Brief Screening Tool For Mild Cognitive Impairment , 2005, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society.

[36]  R. Petersen Mild cognitive impairment as a diagnostic entity , 2004, Journal of internal medicine.

[37]  T. Wagner,et al.  Prevalence and Costs of Chronic Conditions in the VA Health Care System , 2003, Medical care research and review : MCRR.

[38]  Y. Sheline,et al.  Memory improvement following induced hyperinsulinemia in alzheimer's disease , 1996, Neurobiology of Aging.

[39]  J. Morris The Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR) , 1993, Neurology.

[40]  C. Sherbourne,et al.  The RAND 36-Item Health Survey 1.0. , 1993, Health economics.

[41]  A. Jette,et al.  The Physical Activity Scale for the Elderly (PASE): development and evaluation. , 1993, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[42]  Sati Mazumdar,et al.  Rating chronic medical illness burden in geropsychiatric practice and research: Application of the Cumulative Illness Rating Scale , 1992, Psychiatry Research.

[43]  J. Morris,et al.  The Consortium to Establish a Registry for Alzheimer's Disease (CERAD). Part I. Clinical and neuropsychological assesment of Alzheimer's disease , 1989, Neurology.

[44]  Daniel J Buysse,et al.  The Pittsburgh sleep quality index: A new instrument for psychiatric practice and research , 1989, Psychiatry Research.

[45]  J. Lubben Assessing social networks among elderly populations. , 1988 .

[46]  T. Kurosaki,et al.  Measurement of functional activities in older adults in the community. , 1982, Journal of gerontology.

[47]  D. Russell,et al.  Developing a measure of loneliness. , 1978, Journal of personality assessment.

[48]  B. Linn,et al.  CUMULATIVE ILLNESS RATING SCALE , 1968, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society.

[49]  R. Reitan The relation of the trail making test to organic brain damage. , 1955, Journal of consulting psychology.

[50]  Lise R. Talbot,et al.  Smart Home Technology: A New Approach for Performance Measurements of Activities of Daily Living and Prediction of Mild Cognitive Impairment in Older Adults. , 2019, Journal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD.

[51]  Adriana M. Seelye,et al.  Passive Assessment of Routine Driving with Unobtrusive Sensors: A New Approach for Identifying and Monitoring Functional Level in Normal Aging and Mild Cognitive Impairment. , 2017, Journal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD.

[52]  A. G. Fisher,et al.  The dimensionality and validity of the Older Americans Resources and Services (OARS) Activities of Daily Living (ADL) Scale. , 1998, Journal of outcome measurement.

[53]  J. Stroop Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions. , 1992 .

[54]  V. Leirer,et al.  Development and validation of a geriatric depression screening scale: a preliminary report. , 1982, Journal of psychiatric research.