Do semantic standards lack quality? A survey among 34 semantic standards

The adoption of standards to improve interoperability in the automotive, aerospace, shipbuilding and other sectors could save billions. While interoperability standards have been created for a number of industries, problems persist, suggesting a lack of quality of the standards themselves. The issue of semantic standard quality is not often addressed. In this research we take a closer look at the quality of semantics standards, development processes, and survey the current state of the quality of semantic standards by means of a questionnaire that was sent to standards developers. This survey looked at 34 semantic standards, and it shows that the quality of semantic standards for inter-organizational interoperability can be improved. Improved standards may advance interoperability in networked business. Improvement of semantic standards requires transparency of their quality. Although many semantic standard development organisations already have quality assurance in place, this research shows that they could benefit from a quality measuring instrument.

[1]  Christina Soh,et al.  Standards development and diffusion: a case study of RosettaNet , 2007, CACM.

[2]  Roy Rada.  Standards: the language for success , 1993, CACM.

[3]  G. K. Bhattacharyya,et al.  Statistical Concepts And Methods , 1978 .

[4]  Mostafa Hashem Sherif,et al.  Standards of quality and quality of standards for telecommunications and information technologies , 2005, The 4th Conference on Standardization and Innovation in Information Technology, 2005..

[5]  Kai Jakobs,et al.  Information Technology Standards and Standardization: A Global Perspective , 1999 .

[6]  F. Cecil Brenner,et al.  Standardization Essentials: Principles and Practice , 2001 .

[7]  E. Ziegel.  Juran's Quality Control Handbook , 1988 .

[8]  C. Cargill.  Information technology standardization: Theory, process, and organizations , 1989 .

[9]  R. V. Wessel,et al.  Realizing Business Benefits from Company IT Standardization: Case Study Research into the Organizational Value of IT Standards, Towards a Company IT Standardization Management Framework , 2008 .

[10]  M. Pitman.  Qualitative Research Design: An Interactive Approach , 1998 .

[11]  Henk J. de Vries.  IT Standards Typology , 2006 .

[12]  Roy Rada,et al.  Sharing standards: standardizing software projects , 2000, CACM.

[13]  Michael J. Shaw,et al.  Vertical E-Business Standards and Standards Developing Organizations: A Conceptual Framework , 2005, Electron. Mark..

[14]  Eva Söderström.  Formulating a General Standards Life Cycle , 2004, CAiSE.

[15]  Wilhelm Hasselbring.  The role of standards for interoperating information systems , 2000 .

[16]  Knut Blind,et al.  The Economics Of Standards: Theory, Evidence, Policy , 2004 .

[17]  A. Twycross.  Research design: qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods approaches Research design: qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods approaches Creswell John W Sage 320 £29 0761924426 0761924426 [Formula: see text]. , 2004, Nurse researcher.

[18]  Michael J. Shaw,et al.  Interorganizational System Standards Development in Vertical Industries , 2005, Electron. Mark..

[19]  Yannis Charalabidis,et al.  Interoperability in Digital Public Services and Administration: Bridging E-Government and E-Business , 2010 .

[20]  Kai Jakobs.  Advanced topics in information technology standards and standardization research , 2006 .

[21]  K. Lyytinen,et al.  Standard making: a critical research frontier for information systems research , 2006 .

[22]  Knut Blind,et al.  The Economics of Standards , 2004 .

[23]  Miguel P Caldas,et al.  Research design: qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches , 2003 .

[24]  Mario Piattini,et al.  Effective use of ontologies in software measurement , 2009, Knowl. Eng. Rev..

[25]  Egon Berghout,et al.  Information technology standards and standardization: A global perspective , 2000, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[26]  Sudha Ram,et al.  Information systems interoperability: What lies beneath? , 2004, TOIS.

[27]  Viswanath Venkatesh,et al.  Six strategies for electronic medical records systems , 2008, Commun. ACM.

[28]  Shane Greenstein,et al.  Standards and Public Policy , 2006 .

[29]  Paul Oude Luttighuis,et al.  Equipping the Enterprise Interoperability Problem Solver , 2010 .

[30]  Sheila A. Martin,et al.  Interoperability costs in the US automotive supply chain , 2002 .

[31]  J. Thomas,et al.  Data-Exchange Standards and International Organizations: Adoption and Diffusion , 2009 .

[32]  M. Lynne Markus,et al.  Industry-Wide Information Systems Standardization as Collective Action: The Case of the U.S. Residential Mortgage Industry , 2006, MIS Q..

[33]  Erwin Folmer,et al.  Management and Development Model for Open Standards (BOMOS) version 2 , 2011 .

[34]  John W. Creswell,et al.  Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches , 2010 .

[35]  Carl Cargill,et al.  Standards and Public Policy: Standardization: a failing paradigm , 2006 .

[36]  M. Lynne Markus,et al.  Standards and Public Policy: Promoting e-business through vertical IS standards: lessons from the US home mortgage industry , 2006 .

[37]  Roy Rada,et al.  Sharing standards: standardizing the European information society , 2000, CACM.

[38]  Jos van Hillegersberg,et al.  Top IS research on Quality of Transaction Standards: A Structured Literature Review to Identify a Research Gap , 2009 .