Engineering dynamical control of cell fate switching using synthetic phospho-regulons

Significance Many long-term cellular decisions in development, synaptic plasticity, and immunity require cells to recognize input dynamics such as pulse duration or frequency. In dynamically controlled cells, incoming stimuli are often processed and filtered by a rapid-acting signaling layer, and then passed to a downstream slow-acting layer that locks in a longer-term cellular response. Directly testing how such dual-timescale networks control dynamical regulation has been challenging because most tools in synthetic biology allow rewiring of slow gene expression circuits, but not of rapid signaling circuits. In this work, we developed modular peptide tags for engineering synthetic phosphorylation circuits. We used these phospho-regulons to build synthetic dual-timescale networks in which the dynamic responsiveness of a cell fate decision can be selectively tuned. Many cells can sense and respond to time-varying stimuli, selectively triggering changes in cell fate only in response to inputs of a particular duration or frequency. A common motif in dynamically controlled cells is a dual-timescale regulatory network: although long-term fate decisions are ultimately controlled by a slow-timescale switch (e.g., gene expression), input signals are first processed by a fast-timescale signaling layer, which is hypothesized to filter what dynamic information is efficiently relayed downstream. Directly testing the design principles of how dual-timescale circuits control dynamic sensing, however, has been challenging, because most synthetic biology methods have focused solely on rewiring transcriptional circuits, which operate at a single slow timescale. Here, we report the development of a modular approach for flexibly engineering phosphorylation circuits using designed phospho-regulon motifs. By then linking rapid phospho-feedback with slower downstream transcription-based bistable switches, we can construct synthetic dual-timescale circuits in yeast in which the triggering dynamics and the end-state properties of the ON state can be selectively tuned. These phospho-regulon tools thus open up the possibility to engineer cells with customized dynamical control.

[1]  Howard J. Li,et al.  Rapid and tunable post-translational coupling of genetic circuits , 2014, Nature.

[2]  W. Lim,et al.  Recruitment interactions can override catalytic interactions in determining the functional identity of a protein kinase , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[3]  W. Lim,et al.  Conformational Control of the Ste 5 Scaffold Protein Insulates Against MAP Kinase , 2013 .

[4]  Wendell A Lim,et al.  The role of docking interactions in mediating signaling input, output, and discrimination in the yeast MAPK network. , 2005, Molecular cell.

[5]  A. Regev,et al.  Impulse Control: Temporal Dynamics in Gene Transcription , 2011, Cell.

[6]  W. Lim,et al.  Docking interactions in protein kinase and phosphatase networks. , 2006, Current opinion in structural biology.

[7]  James R Faeder,et al.  Cutting Edge: Differential Regulation of PTEN by TCR, Akt, and FoxO1 Controls CD4+ T Cell Fate Decisions , 2015, The Journal of Immunology.

[8]  Hana El-Samad,et al.  Cellular noise regulons underlie fluctuations in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. , 2012, Molecular cell.

[9]  Z. Cheng,et al.  Cell fate decision mediated by p53 pulses , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[10]  R. Aebersold,et al.  Feedback Phosphorylation of an RGS Protein by MAP Kinase in Yeast* , 1999, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[11]  P. Bork,et al.  Linear Motif Atlas for Phosphorylation-Dependent Signaling , 2008, Science Signaling.

[12]  James E. Ferrell,et al.  Bistability in cell signaling: How to make continuous processes discontinuous, and reversible processes irreversible. , 2001, Chaos.

[13]  Stefan Brückner,et al.  Differential regulation of Tec1 by Fus3 and Kss1 confers signaling specificity in yeast development , 2004, Current Genetics.

[14]  Galit Lahav,et al.  Stimulus-dependent dynamics of p53 in single cells , 2011, Molecular systems biology.

[15]  Lan Huang,et al.  Fus3-Regulated Tec1 Degradation through SCFCdc4 Determines MAPK Signaling Specificity during Mating in Yeast , 2004, Cell.

[16]  M. Madan Babu,et al.  A million peptide motifs for the molecular biologist. , 2014, Molecular cell.

[17]  Wendell A. Lim,et al.  Rapid Diversification of Cell Signaling Phenotypes by Modular Domain Recombination , 2010, Science.

[18]  John R. Yates,et al.  Pheromone-Dependent Destruction of the Tec1 Transcription Factor Is Required for MAP Kinase Signaling Specificity in Yeast , 2004, Cell.

[19]  David A. Drubin,et al.  Rational design of memory in eukaryotic cells. , 2007, Genes & development.

[20]  James R Faeder,et al.  The Duration of T Cell Stimulation Is a Critical Determinant of Cell Fate and Plasticity , 2013, Science Signaling.

[21]  James Briscoe,et al.  Ptch1 and Gli regulate Shh signalling dynamics via multiple mechanisms , 2015, Nature Communications.

[22]  Wendell A. Lim,et al.  Conformational Control of the Ste5 Scaffold Protein Insulates Against MAP Kinase Misactivation , 2012, Science.

[23]  H. Madhani,et al.  Multisite Phosphorylation of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae Filamentous Growth Regulator Tec1 Is Required for its Recognition by the E3 Ubiquitin Ligase Adaptor Cdc4 and Its Subsequent Destruction In Vivo , 2010, Eukaryotic Cell.

[24]  J. Keasling,et al.  Integrating Biological Redesign: Where Synthetic Biology Came From and Where It Needs to Go , 2014, Cell.

[25]  E. Kandel,et al.  The Molecular and Systems Biology of Memory , 2014, Cell.

[26]  Zengyi Shao,et al.  DNA assembler, an in vivo genetic method for rapid construction of biochemical pathways , 2008, Nucleic acids research.

[27]  W. Paul,et al.  Differentiation of effector CD4 T cell populations (*). , 2010, Annual review of immunology.

[28]  M. Greenberg,et al.  Neuronal activity-regulated gene transcription in synapse development and cognitive function. , 2011, Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology.

[29]  Donald Voet,et al.  Fundamentals of Biochemistry , 1999 .

[30]  Gregory Stephanopoulos,et al.  Engineering of Promoter Replacement Cassettes for Fine-Tuning of Gene Expression in Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 2006, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[31]  Wendell A. Lim,et al.  Rewiring MAP Kinase Pathways Using Alternative Scaffold Assembly Mechanisms , 2003, Science.

[32]  J. Collins,et al.  Programmable cells: interfacing natural and engineered gene networks. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[33]  D. Pincus,et al.  In silico feedback for in vivo regulation of a gene expression circuit , 2011, Nature Biotechnology.

[34]  James Briscoe,et al.  Gene Regulatory Logic for Reading the Sonic Hedgehog Signaling Gradient in the Vertebrate Neural Tube , 2012, Cell.

[35]  James Briscoe,et al.  Establishing and interpreting graded Sonic Hedgehog signaling during vertebrate neural tube patterning: the role of negative feedback. , 2009, Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology.

[36]  M. Tyers,et al.  Structural Basis for Phosphodependent Substrate Selection and Orientation by the SCFCdc4 Ubiquitin Ligase , 2003, Cell.

[37]  Nicholas T. Ingolia,et al.  Positive-Feedback Loops as a Flexible Biological Module , 2007, Current Biology.

[38]  W. Lucchesi,et al.  Novel insights into CaMKII function and regulation during memory formation , 2011, Brain Research Bulletin.

[39]  B. Errede,et al.  A family of destabilized cyan fluorescent proteins as transcriptional reporters in S. cerevisiae , 2006, Yeast.

[40]  J. Collins,et al.  Construction of a genetic toggle switch in Escherichia coli , 2000, Nature.

[41]  Pamela A. Silver,et al.  Building Synthetic Memory , 2013, Current Biology.

[42]  C. Bashor,et al.  References and Notes Supporting Online Material Using Engineered Scaffold Interactions to Reshape Map Kinase Pathway Signaling Dynamics , 2022 .

[43]  G. Lahav,et al.  Encoding and Decoding Cellular Information through Signaling Dynamics , 2013, Cell.

[44]  Rey-Huei Chen,et al.  Molecular interpretation of ERK signal duration by immediate early gene products , 2002, Nature Cell Biology.

[45]  Takeshi Norimatsu,et al.  Encoding and Decoding , 2016 .