Energy saving in greenhouses: optimal use of climate conditions and crop management

In the last few years, energy consumption in greenhouses has gained increased interest, due to the liberalisation of the energy market and the increasing prices of natural gas. In this paper, the effects of a series of adaptations in greenhouse climate and cropping systems on crop production and energy consumption are presented. Greenhouse energy consumption is primarily determined by the temperature set points. Allowing temperatures to fluctuate, can conserve 3-13% energy, depending on the bandwidth applied. If average temperatures were kept at set point values, it hardly affected plant production. Lowering the temperature set point by 2°C reduced energy consumption by 16%, and production by 3%. Increasing relative humidity set points and reducing plant transpiration by removing leaves or applying antitranspirants could save approximately 5% energy with hardly any effect on plant growth. Increased light transmission of the greenhouse increased plant production and slightly reduced the energy consumption. Filtering out NIR had a positive effect on plant production, but negatively affected greenhouse temperatures. Substantial energy conservation could be realized by the application of an energy screen (16-20%). Optimal use of the available amount of CO2 positively affected crop production. These results indicate that in present cropping systems, energy conservation of 25-30% seems possible without major investments and without loss of production. Characteristics of such an energy efficient cropping strategy are the use of relative low temperature set points, high humidities, use of energy screens and fluent transitions in greenhouse climate.

[1]  H. Challa,et al.  The solar greenhouse: state of the art in energy saving and sustainable energy supply. , 2005 .

[2]  R. Besford,et al.  The Greenhouse Effect: Acclimation of Tomato Plants Growing in High CO2, Photosynthesis and Ribulose-1, 5-Bisphosphate Carboxylase Protein , 1990 .

[3]  T. A. Dueck,et al.  FILTERING NATURAL LIGHT AT THE GREENHOUSE COVERING - BETTER GREENHOUSE CLIMATE AND HIGHER PRODUCTION BY FILTERING OUT NIR? , 2006 .

[4]  Esther Meinen,et al.  Effects of Temperature Integration on Growth and Development of Roses , 2005 .

[6]  E. J. van Henten,et al.  Optimisation of CO2 and Temperature in Terms of Crop Growth and Energy Use , 2005 .

[7]  O. Körner,et al.  Crop based climate regimes for energy saving in greenhouse cultivation , 2003 .

[8]  F. Buwalda,et al.  AN ENERGY EFFICIENT HEATING STRATEGY FOR CUT ROSE PRODUCTION BASED ON CROP TOLERANCE TO TEMPERATURE FLUCTUATIONS , 1999 .

[9]  N. J. van de Braak,et al.  THE ENERGY BALANCE AND ENERGY-SAVING MEASURES IN GREENHOUSE TOMATO CULTIVATION , 2005 .

[10]  A. de Gelder,et al.  Tomato Yield in a Closed Greenhouse and Comparison with Simulated Yields in Closed and Conventional Greenhouses , 2005 .

[11]  Ep Heuvelink,et al.  Modelling biomass production and yield of horticultural crops: a review , 1998 .

[12]  P.H.B. de Visser,et al.  Feed-Forward control of water and nutrient supply in greenhouse horticulture: development of a system , 2004 .

[13]  A. D. Koning,et al.  Long-term temperature integration of tomato. Growth and development under alternating temperature regimes , 1990 .

[14]  A. Gosselin,et al.  Duration of CO2 enrichment influences growth, yield, and gas exchange of two tomato species. , 1990 .

[15]  T. A. Dueck,et al.  Efficiency of light energy used by leaves situated in different levels of a sweet pepper canopy , 2006 .

[16]  R.E.E. Jongschaap,et al.  Filtering natural light by the greenhouse covering using model simulations - more production and better quality by diffuse light , 2006 .

[17]  R. Grange,et al.  A review of the effects of atmospheric humidity on the growth of horticultural crops , 1987 .

[18]  R. G. Hurd,et al.  THE INFLUENCE OF DIFFERENT TEMPERATURE PATTERNS HAVING THE SAME INTEGRAL ON THE EARLINESS AND YIELD OF TOMATOES , 1984 .

[19]  Leo F. M. Marcelis,et al.  Control of Crop Growth and Nutrient Supply by the Combined Use of Crop Models and Plant Sensors , 2000 .

[20]  L.F.M. Marcelis,et al.  Quantification of the growth response of light quantity of greenhouse grown crops , 2006 .

[21]  A. de Gelder,et al.  CLOSED GREENHOUSE: A STARTING POINT FOR SUSTAINABLE ENTREPRENEURSHIP IN HORTICULTURE , 2005 .

[22]  A. A. Rijsdijk,et al.  Temperature integration on a 24-hour base: a more efficient climate control strategy. , 2000 .

[23]  H. F. de Zwart,et al.  Multiple-day temperature settings on the basis of the assimilate balance: a simulation study , 2006 .

[24]  J. C. Bakker,et al.  The effects of diurnal temperature regimes on growth and yield of glasshouse sweet pepper. , 1988 .

[25]  de H.F. Zwart,et al.  Analyzing energy-saving options in greenhouse cultivation using a simulation model , 1996 .

[26]  Janneke A. Dieleman,et al.  Energy screens in tomato: determining the optimal opening strategy , 2006 .

[27]  Marc Tchamitchian,et al.  Optimal temperature regimes for a greenhouse crop with a carbohydrate pool: A modelling study , 1994 .