Hydrological effects of within-catchment heterogeneity of drainage density

Local drainage density (dd) has been traditionally defined as the inverse of twice the distance one has to walk before encountering a channel. This formalization easily allows to derive raster-based maps of dd extracted straight off from digital elevation model data. Maps of local dd, which are continuous in space, are able to reveal the appearance of strong heterogeneities in the geological and geomorphological properties of natural landscapes across different scales. In this work we employ the information provided by these spatial maps to study the potential effects of the within-catchment variability of dd on the hydrologic response. A simple power law relationship between runoff yield at the local scale and the value of dd has been adopted; the hypothesis is supported by a large number of past empirical observations and modeling. The novel framework proposed (ddRWF) embeds this spatially variable runoff weight in the well-known Rescaled Width Function (RWF) framework, based on the more general geomorphological theory of the hydrologic response. The model is applied to four sub-basins in the Cascade Range Region (Oregon, USA) where strong contrasts in dissection patterns due the underlain geology have been broadly addressed in previous literature. The ddRWF approach is compared with the classic RWF in terms of shape, moments and peak of the simulated hydrograph response. Results hint that the variability of runoff yield due to the heterogeneity of dd (i.e. of hillslope lengths) determines a more rapid concentration of runoff, which implies shorter lag times, larger skewness and higher peak floods, especially in the case hillslope velocity is much smaller than channel velocity. The potential of the proposed framework relies on accounting for spatially variable losses related to geomorphologic heterogeneity in lumped rainfall–runoff models, still keeping the simple and robust structure of the IUH approach.

[1]  Diane M. McKnight,et al.  Transport and cycling of iron and hydrogen peroxide in a freshwater stream: Influence of organic acids , 2003 .

[2]  John P. Bloomfield,et al.  Some relationships between lithology, basin form and hydrology: a case study from the Thames basin, UK , 2011 .

[3]  E. Volpi,et al.  Effects of hillslope dynamics and network geometry on the scaling properties of the hydrologic response , 2011 .

[4]  R. Horton Drainage‐basin characteristics , 1932 .

[5]  E. Foufoula‐Georgiou,et al.  Channel network source representation using digital elevation models , 1993 .

[6]  M. Gannett,et al.  Fire and water: Volcanology, geomorphology, and hydrogeology of the Cascade Range, central Oregon , 2009 .

[7]  Gordon E. Grant,et al.  Groundwater dynamics mediate low‐flow response to global warming in snow‐dominated alpine regions , 2009 .

[8]  R. Bras,et al.  Climatic and ecological controls of equilibrium drainage density, relief, and channel concavity in dry lands , 2010 .

[9]  Andrea Rinaldo,et al.  GEOMORPHOLOGICAL THEORY OF THE HYDROLOGICAL RESPONSE , 1996 .

[10]  E. Volpi,et al.  Analytical modeling of the hydrologic response under moving rainstorms: Storm-catchment interaction and resonance , 2013 .

[11]  Dara Entekhabi,et al.  Basin hydrologic response relations to distributed physiographic descriptors and climate , 2001 .

[12]  Athanasios Papoulis,et al.  Probability, Random Variables and Stochastic Processes , 1965 .

[13]  John F. O'Callaghan,et al.  The extraction of drainage networks from digital elevation data , 1984, Comput. Vis. Graph. Image Process..

[14]  P. Saco,et al.  Kinematic dispersion effects of hillslope velocities , 2004 .

[15]  M. D. Lazzaro Correlation between channel and hillslope lengths and its effects on the hydrologic response , 2008 .

[16]  A. Rinaldo,et al.  Can One Gauge the Shape of a Basin , 1995 .

[17]  D. Montgomery,et al.  Channel and Perennial Flow Initiation in Headwater Streams: Management Implications of Variability in Source-Area Size , 2007, Environmental management.

[18]  R. Rigon,et al.  Hillslope and channel contributions to the hydrologic response , 2003 .

[19]  J. Humbert Intérêt de la densité de drainage pour régionaliser les données hydrologiques en zone montagneuse , 1990 .

[20]  Desmond E. Walling,et al.  THE VARIATION OF DRAINAGE DENSITY WITHIN A CATCHMENT , 1968 .

[21]  A. Rinaldo,et al.  Fractal River Basins: Chance and Self-Organization , 1997 .

[22]  Mark A. Melton,et al.  Correlation Structure of Morphometric Properties of Drainage Systems and Their Controlling Agents , 1958, The Journal of Geology.

[23]  R. Horton EROSIONAL DEVELOPMENT OF STREAMS AND THEIR DRAINAGE BASINS; HYDROPHYSICAL APPROACH TO QUANTITATIVE MORPHOLOGY , 1945 .

[24]  Gordon E. Grant,et al.  Coevolution of hydrology and topography on a basalt landscape in the Oregon Cascade Range, USA , 2010 .

[25]  Filippo Catani,et al.  Statistical analysis of drainage density from digital terrain data , 2001 .

[26]  Gregory E. Tucker,et al.  A stochastic approach to modeling the role of rainfall variability in drainage basin evolution , 2000 .

[27]  Samuele Segoni,et al.  An empirical geomorphology‐based approach to the spatial prediction of soil thickness at catchment scale , 2010 .

[28]  D. Montgomery,et al.  Source areas, drainage density, and channel initiation , 1989 .

[29]  Grazia Fattoruso,et al.  Estimating the suspended sediment yield in a river network by means of geomorphic parameters and regression relationships , 2008 .

[30]  David G. Tarboton,et al.  On the extraction of channel networks from digital elevation data , 1991 .

[31]  E. Volpi,et al.  A new approach to account for the spatial variability of drainage density in rainfall-runoff modelling , 2014 .

[32]  M. D. Lazzaro Regional analysis of storm hydrographs in the Rescaled Width Function framework , 2009 .

[33]  Gregory E. Tucker,et al.  Hillslope processes, drainage density, and landscape morphology , 1998 .

[34]  Wei Luo,et al.  Estimating hydraulic conductivity from drainage patterns—A case study in the Oregon Cascades , 2010 .

[35]  Takashi Oguchi,et al.  Drainage Density and Relative Relief in Humid Steep Mountains with Frequent Slope Failure , 1997 .

[36]  Stanley A. Schumm,et al.  The role of creep and rainwash on the retreat of badland slopes [South Dakota] , 1956 .

[37]  D. Montgomery,et al.  Channel Initiation and the Problem of Landscape Scale , 1992, Science.

[38]  E. Volpi,et al.  A simplified framework for assessing the impact of rainfall spatial variability on the hydrologic response , 2012 .

[39]  A. Rinaldo,et al.  Scale effect on geomorphologic and kinematic dispersion , 2003 .

[40]  S. Wells,et al.  Geologic influences on fluvial hydrology and bedload transport in small mountainous watersheds, Northern New Mexico, U.S.A. , 1989 .

[41]  Attilio Castellarin,et al.  A look at the links between drainage density and flood statistics , 2008 .

[42]  G. Grant,et al.  Influence of volcanic history on groundwater patterns on the west slope of the Oregon High Cascades , 2006 .

[43]  Wei Luo,et al.  Estimating hydraulic conductivity for the Martian subsurface based on drainage patterns — A case study in the Mare Tyrrhenum Quadrangle , 2011 .

[44]  Tomasz F. Stepinski,et al.  Identification of geologic contrasts from landscape dissection pattern: An application to the Cascade Range, Oregon, USA , 2008 .

[45]  Gordon E. Grant,et al.  A geological framework for interpreting the low‐flow regimes of Cascade streams, Willamette River Basin, Oregon , 2004 .