The three-dimensional structure of fish schools

Summary1.Methods for producing and analyzing long-term three-dimensional records of the positions of individuals within fish schools are described. Detailed analysis of internal structure and overall shapes of schools of three species which school to varying degrees are reported: Data from cod (Gadus morhua), a weak facultative schooler, saithe (Pollachius virens), a strong facultative schooler, and herring (Clupea harengus), an obligate schooler, are presented.2.Fish do not position themselves at random within schools (Figs. 1 and 2). This is shown to result from the maintenance of minimum approach distances between fish (Fig. 3). Comparison of the frequency of neighbors at different distances with that expected at random (Fig. 3), however, demonstrates that fish space themselves more regularly than one would expect if the structure resulted wholly from minimum approach distances.3.Herring and saithe are shown to swim at nearly but not exactly the same depth as their neighbors (Fig. 5). Neighbors are more-or-less equally common in all directions (bearings) around fish, although herring show some tendency toward taking up positions at 45° and 135°, the positions expected if school structure were a cubic lattice. School structure is present in a statistical sense only.4.Herring are shown to maintain proportionately larger interfish distances than do saithe or cod (Fig. 7). These results are discussed in terms of the body structure of the three species and the antipredator function of schooling. Shape of cod schools and, to a lesser degree, saithe schools, is shown to be highly variable. Herring schools, however, appear fairly constant in their external shape (Fig. 10).5.Factors affecting the structure of schools of saithe are studied. Increasing the number of fish in the school or the speed at which it is swimming results in smaller interfish distances (Figs. 8 and 9).

[1]  W. Bateson,et al.  The Sense-organs and Perceptions of Fishes; with Remarks on the Supply of Bait , 1890, Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom.

[2]  A. Parr A contribution to the theoretical analysis of the schooling behavior of fishes , 1927 .

[3]  C. Breder Equations Descriptive of Fish Schools and Other Animal Aggregations , 1954 .

[4]  M. Keenleyside,et al.  Some Aspects of the Schooling Behaviour of Fish , 1955 .

[5]  Bernice W. Polemis Nonparametric Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences , 1959 .

[6]  Charles M. Breder,et al.  Studies on social groupings in fishes. Bulletin of the AMNH ; v. 117, article 6 , 1959 .

[7]  C. Breder Vortices and fish schools , 1965 .

[8]  H. A. Baldwin,et al.  Methods for measuring the three-dimensional structure of fish schools. , 1965, Animal behaviour.

[9]  C. Hemmings,et al.  OLFACTION AND VISION IN FISH SCHOOLING , 1966 .

[10]  J. Hunter,et al.  Procedure for Analysis of Schooling Behavior , 1966 .

[11]  J. Lythgoe Visual pigments and underwater vision , 1966 .

[12]  C. Breder On the survival value of fish schools , 1967, Zoologica : scientific contributions of the New York Zoological Society..

[13]  J. Hunter,et al.  Some Aspects of the Organization of Fish Schools , 1970 .

[14]  Spacing and Density in Schooling Threespine Sticklebacks (Gasterosteus aculeatus) and Mummichog (Fundulus heteroclitus) , 1971 .

[15]  W. Hamilton Geometry for the selfish herd. , 1971, Journal of theoretical biology.

[16]  Estimating Distances Between Fish Schooling in an Aquarium , 1971 .

[17]  J. R. Nursall Some Behavioral Interactions of Spottail Shiners (Notropis hudsonius), Yellow Perch (Perca flavescens), and Northern Pike (Esox lucius) , 1973 .

[18]  T. J. Pitcher,et al.  The three-dimensional structure of schools in the minnow, Phoxinus phoxinus (L.) , 1973 .

[19]  D. Weihs Hydromechanics of Fish Schooling , 1973, Nature.

[20]  D. V. Radakov Schooling in the ecology of fish , 1973 .

[21]  B. Seghers,et al.  SCHOOLING BEHAVIOR IN THE GUPPY (POECILIA RETICULATA): AN EVOLUTIONARY RESPONSE TO PREDATION , 1974, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[22]  E. C. Pielou,et al.  An introduction to mathematical ecology , 1970 .

[23]  T. J. Pitcher A Periscopic Method for Determining the Three-Dimensional Positions of Fish in Schools , 1975 .

[24]  D. Weihs Some Hydrodynamical Aspects of Fish Schooling , 1975 .

[25]  Michel Treisman,et al.  Predation and the evolution of gregariousness. I. Models for concealment and evasion , 1975, Animal Behaviour.

[26]  T. Pitcher,et al.  A blind fish can school. , 1976, Science.

[27]  Brian L. Partridge,et al.  A low-cost interactive coordinate plotter , 1977 .

[28]  P. F. Major PREDATOR-PREY INTERACTIONS IN SCHOOLING FISHES DURING PERIODS OF TWILIGHT: A STUDY OF THE SILVERSIDE PRANESUS INSULARUM IN HAWAll 1 , 1977 .

[29]  Charles J. Amlaner,et al.  Voltage-controlled oscillators: Inexpensive alternative to analog-to-digital converters , 1978 .

[30]  T. Pitcher,et al.  Sensory information and the organization of behaviour in a shoaling cyprinid fish , 1979, Animal Behaviour.

[31]  T. Pitcher,et al.  Fish school density and volume , 1979 .

[32]  T. Pitcher,et al.  Evidence against a hydrodynamic function for fish schools , 1979, Nature.

[33]  B. Partridge,et al.  The effect of school size on the structure and dynamics of minnow schools , 1980, Animal Behaviour.

[34]  B L Partridge,et al.  The structure and function of fish schools. , 1982, Scientific American.

[35]  T. Pitcher,et al.  The sensory basis of fish schools: Relative roles of lateral line and vision , 1980, Journal of comparative physiology.

[36]  L. Dill,et al.  The three-dimensional structure of airborne bird flocks , 1978, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[37]  The Sense-organs and Perceptions of Fishes ; with Remarks on the Supply of Bait , 2005 .