Perceptions of Organizational Ethicality: Do Inflated Perceptions of Self Lead to Inflated Perceptions of the Organization?

Scholars have suggested that the tendency for an individual to perceive him- or herself as more ethical than others might influence the individual's perceptions of his or her organization's ethics. The purpose of this study is to consider if and/or when such a relationship exists. A thorough consideration of the nature of perceptions of relative ethicality suggests that a positive self-bias would negatively influence perceptions of organizational ethicality. The results of an empirical study involving working managers and employees of a hospital support that argument. Furthermore, the results indicate that organizational identification, perceived organizational cohesion, and an individual's insulation also influence individual perceptions of relative organizational ethicality. The findings illuminate this particular phenomenon and further our understanding of the relationship between the individual and the organization, more generally.

[1]  J. V. Wood,et al.  Theory and Research Concerning Social Comparisons of Personal Attributes , 1989 .

[2]  S. West,et al.  Depression and evaluative schemata. , 1985, Journal of personality.

[3]  Celia V. Harquail,et al.  Organizational images and member identification. , 1994 .

[4]  Shelley E. Taylor,et al.  Illusion and well-being: a social psychological perspective on mental health. , 1988, Psychological bulletin.

[5]  Dan Farrell.  Exit, Voice, Loyalty, and Neglect as Responses to Job Dissatisfaction: A Multidimensional Scaling Study , 1983 .

[6]  L. Ferrell,et al.  A Review of Empirical Studies Assessing Ethical Decision Making in Business , 2000 .

[7]  K. Widaman.  Hierarchically Nested Covariance Structure Models for Multitrait-Multimethod Data , 1985 .

[8]  Kenneth A. Bollen,et al.  Structural Equations with Latent Variables , 1989 .

[9]  Richard Joiner,et al.  The typical student as an in‐group member: eliminating optimistic bias by reducing social distance , 2000 .

[10]  Ramon J. Aldag,et al.  Organizational Tonypandy: Lessons from a Quarter Century of the Groupthink Phenomenon. , 1998, Organizational behavior and human decision processes.

[11]  L. Festinger.  A Theory of Social Comparison Processes , 1954 .

[12]  G. Shahar.  Maternal Personality and Distress as Predictors of Child Neglect , 2001 .

[13]  J. Pfeffer,et al.  A social information processing approach to job attitudes and task design. , 1978, Administrative science quarterly.

[14]  S. Carless,et al.  Cohesion : Conceptual and measurement issues. Author's reply , 2000 .

[15]  Albert V. Carron,et al.  Cohesion: Conceptual and Measurement Issues , 2000 .

[16]  D. Izraeli,et al.  Ethical beliefs and behavior among managers: A cross-cultural perspective , 1988 .

[17]  Fred A. Mael,et al.  Alumni and their alma mater: A partial test of the reformulated model of organizational identification , 1992 .

[18]  Steve Hinkle,et al.  Psychological Attachment to the Group: Cross-Cultural Differences in Organizational Identification and Subjective Norms as Predictors of Workers' Turnover Intentions , 1998 .

[19]  D. Campbell,et al.  Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. , 1959, Psychological bulletin.

[20]  Maureen L. Ambrose,et al.  Sex differences in business ethics: The importance of perceptions. , 1999 .

[21]  P. Goodman.  Social Comparison Processes in Organizations , 1977 .

[22]  E. Goffman.  The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life , 1959 .

[23]  P. E. Mudrack,et al.  Defining Group Cohesiveness , 1989 .

[24]  Esser,et al.  Alive and Well after 25 Years: A Review of Groupthink Research. , 1998, Organizational behavior and human decision processes.

[25]  E. V. Schie,et al.  Foci and correlates of organizational identification , 2000 .

[26]  Thomas R. Hensley,et al.  Victims of Groupthink , 1986 .

[27]  R. Ford,et al.  Ethical decision making: A review of the empirical literature , 1994 .

[28]  Michael H. Kutner.  Applied Linear Statistical Models , 1974 .

[29]  T. Cook,et al.  Quasi-experimentation: Design & analysis issues for field settings , 1979 .

[30]  John R. Montanari,et al.  An Empirical Investigation of the Groupthink Phenomenon , 1986 .

[31]  I. Janis.  Groupthink: Psychological Studies of Policy Decisions and Fiascoes , 1982 .

[32]  S. West,et al.  Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions. , 1994 .

[33]  I. Janis.  Victims of Groupthink: A psychological study of foreign-policy decisions and fiascoes. By Irving L. Janis. (Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1972. viii + 276 pp. Map, illustrations, chart, notes, sources, bibliography, and index. Cloth, $7.95; paper $4.50.) , 1973 .

[34]  R. Sims.  Linking groupthink to unethical behavior in organizations , 1992 .

[35]  Donald P. Schwab,et al.  Research Methods for Organizational Studies , 1998 .

[36]  James C. Anderson,et al.  STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING IN PRACTICE: A REVIEW AND RECOMMENDED TWO-STEP APPROACH , 1988 .

[37]  Fred A. Mael,et al.  Social identity theory and the organization , 1989 .

[38]  Virginia S. Y. Kwan,et al.  Decomposing a Sense of Superiority: The Differential Social Impact of Self-Regard and Regard for Others , 2000 .

[39]  David M. Messick,et al.  Ethical Leadership and the Psychology of Decision Making , 2001 .

[40]  S. Budner.  Intolerance of ambiguity as a personality variable. , 1962, Journal of personality.