No sign of quitting: incidental exposure to “no smoking” signs ironically boosts cigarette-approach tendencies in smokers

The unconscious mind tends to disregard negations in its processing of semantic meaning. Therefore, messages containing negated concepts can ironically prime mental representations and evaluations that are opposite to those intended. We hypothesized that the subtle presentation of a negated concept (e.g., “no smoking”) would activate ironic motivational orientations as well. We tested this hypothesis in a public health context. Smokers viewed photographs in which “no smoking” signs were either inconspicuously embedded (prime condition) or edited out (control condition). Primed smokers showed amplified automatic approach tendencies toward smoking-related stimuli, but not toward smoking-unrelated stimuli: an ironic motivational response to exposure to the signs. Since passive priming effects generally serve to facilitate forms of action, not inhibit them, antismoking and other public health campaigns may ironically increase the very behaviors they seek to reduce.

[1]  J. Bargh,et al.  Automaticity of social behavior: direct effects of trait construct and stereotype-activation on action. , 1996, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[2]  R. de Raedt,et al.  Being Moved , 2010, Psychological science.

[3]  Bertram Gawronski,et al.  At the boundaries of automaticity: negation as reflective operation. , 2006, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[4]  T. Chartrand,et al.  The mind in the middle: A practical guide to priming and automaticity research. , 2000 .

[5]  J. Bargh,et al.  Of men and mackerels: Attention and automatic behavior , 2000 .

[6]  R. Wiers,et al.  Retraining Automatic Action Tendencies Changes Alcoholic Patients’ Approach Bias for Alcohol and Improves Treatment Outcome , 2011, Psychological science.

[7]  S. Sloman The empirical case for two systems of reasoning. , 1996 .

[8]  Claude H. Miller,et al.  Adolescent Reactance and Anti-Smoking Campaigns: A Theoretical Approach , 2003, Health communication.

[9]  M. Ferguson,et al.  Beyond behaviorism: on the automaticity of higher mental processes. , 2000, Psychological bulletin.

[10]  Carey K. Morewedge,et al.  Associative processes in intuitive judgment , 2010, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[11]  D. J. Ringold,et al.  Boomerang Effects in Response to Public Health Interventions: Some Unintended Consequences in the Alcoholic Beverage Market , 2002 .

[12]  D. Gilbert How mental systems believe. , 1991 .

[13]  Bertram Gawronski,et al.  When “Just Say No” is not enough: Affirmation versus negation training and the reduction of automatic stereotype activation☆ , 2008 .

[14]  K. Brownell,et al.  Priming effects of television food advertising on eating behavior. , 2009, Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association.

[15]  M. Goldman,et al.  Implicit Priming of Alcohol Expectancy Memory Processes and Subsequent Drinking Behavior , 1995 .

[16]  J. Bargh,et al.  The perception–behavior expressway: Automatic effects of social perception on social behavior. , 2001 .

[17]  S. Chaiken,et al.  Personality and Social Psychology Bulle- Tin Chen, Bargh / Consequences of Automatic Evaluation Immediate Behavioral Predispositions to Approach or Avoid the Stimulus , 2022 .

[18]  L. Kozlowski,et al.  The Fagerström Test for Nicotine Dependence: a revision of the Fagerström Tolerance Questionnaire. , 1991, British journal of addiction.

[19]  E. Burnstein,et al.  “I am not guilty” vs “I am innocent”: Successful negation may depend on the schema used for its encoding☆ , 2004 .

[20]  John A. Bargh,et al.  Social Psychology and the Unconscious: The Automaticity of Higher Mental Processes , 2013 .