A Hybrid MCDM Technique for Risk Management in Construction Projects

Multi-stakeholder based construction projects are subject to potential risk factors due to dynamic business environment and stakeholders’ lack of knowledge. When solving project management tasks, it is necessary to quantify the main risk indicators of the projects. Managing these requires suitable risk mitigation strategies to evaluate and analyse their severity. The existence of information asymmetry also causes difficulties with achieving Pareto efficiency. Hence, to ensure balanced satisfaction of all participants, risk evaluation of these projects can be considered as an important part of the multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) process. In real-life problems, evaluation of project risks is often uncertain and even incomplete, and the prevailing methodologies fail to handle such situations. To address the problem, this paper extends the analytical network process (ANP) methodology in the D numbers domain to handle three types of ambiguous information’s, viz. complete, uncertain, and incomplete, and assesses the weight of risk criteria. The D numbers based approach overcomes the deficiencies of the exclusiveness hypothesis and completeness constraint of Dempster–Shafer (D–S) theory. Here, preference ratings of the decision matrix for each decision-maker are determined using a D numbers extended consistent fuzzy preference relation (D-CFPR). An extended multi-attributive border approximation area comparison (MABAC) method in D numbers is then developed to rank and select the best alternative risk response strategy. Finally, an illustrative example from construction sector is presented to check the feasibility of the proposed approach. For checking the reliability of alternative ranking, a comparative analysis is performed with different MCDM approaches in D numbers domain. Based on different criteria weights, a sensitivity analysis of obtained ranking of the hybrid D-ANP-MABAC model is performed to verify the robustness of the proposed method.

[1]  Jian-qiang Wang,et al.  An Interval Type-2 Fuzzy Likelihood-Based MABAC Approach and Its Application in Selecting Hotels on a Tourism Website , 2017, Int. J. Fuzzy Syst..

[2]  Jeng-Hsiang Lin,et al.  Applying Analytic Network Process to the Selection of Construction Projects , 2016 .

[3]  Simon Smith,et al.  Tools for selecting appropriate risk management techniques in the built environment , 2008 .

[4]  Justus N. Agumba,et al.  Risk management in the construction industry: A new literature review , 2016 .

[5]  Yong Deng,et al.  D-CFPR: D numbers extended consistent fuzzy preference relations , 2014, Knowl. Based Syst..

[6]  Yong Hu,et al.  A novel distance function of D numbers and its application in product engineering , 2016, Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell..

[7]  Reza Ghodsi,et al.  Construction project risk assessment by using adaptive-network-based fuzzy inference system: An empirical study , 2014 .

[8]  Xinyang Deng,et al.  D-DEMATEL: a new method to identify critical success factors in emergency management , 2017 .

[9]  Mohammad Mahdavi Mazdeh,et al.  Knowledge-based strategy selection: a hybrid model and its implementation , 2016 .

[10]  Mladen Radujković,et al.  Internal and external risk based assesment and evaluation for the large infrastructure projects , 2016 .

[11]  Vahidreza Yousefi,et al.  Proposing a neural network model to predict time and cost claims in construction projects , 2016 .

[12]  Yongchuan Tang,et al.  Conflicting evidence combination based on uncertainty measure and distance of evidence , 2016, SpringerPlus.

[13]  Francisco Herrera,et al.  Some issues on consistency of fuzzy preference relations , 2004, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[14]  Shahid Iqbal,et al.  Risk management in construction projects , 2015 .

[15]  Yong Hu,et al.  A Modified TOPSIS Method Based onDNumbers and Its Applications in Human Resources Selection , 2016 .

[16]  Amarsinh B. Landage,et al.  Risk Management in Construction Industry , 2016 .

[17]  Xinyang Deng,et al.  Bridge Condition Assessment Using D Numbers , 2014, TheScientificWorldJournal.

[18]  Pan Yue,et al.  A hybrid fuzzy evaluation method for curtain grouting efficiency assessment based on an AHP method extended by D numbers , 2016, Expert Syst. Appl..

[19]  Gordan Stojic,et al.  Novel Integrated Multi-Criteria Model for Supplier Selection: Case Study Construction Company , 2017, Symmetry.

[20]  Zenonas Turskis,et al.  A model of discrete zero-sum two-person matrix games with grey numbers to solve dispute resolution problems in construction , 2017 .

[21]  Norhazilan Md Noor,et al.  Hybrid SWARA-COPRAS method for risk assessment in deep foundation excavation project: an Iranian case study , 2017 .

[22]  Joseph H. M. Tah,et al.  A proposal for construction project risk assessment using fuzzy logic , 2000 .

[23]  Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas,et al.  Risk evaluation of tunneling projects , 2012 .

[24]  Marjan S. Jalali,et al.  A fuzzy knowledge-based framework for risk assessment of residential real estate investments , 2017 .

[25]  Mehdi Tavakolan,et al.  Construction project risk assessment using combined fuzzy and FMEA , 2013, 2013 Joint IFSA World Congress and NAFIPS Annual Meeting (IFSA/NAFIPS).

[26]  Witold Pedrycz,et al.  Fuzzy Monte Carlo Simulation and Risk Assessment in Construction , 2010, Comput. Aided Civ. Infrastructure Eng..

[27]  Willy Herroelen,et al.  A Methodology for Integrated Risk Management and Proactive Scheduling of Construction Projects , 2008 .

[28]  Xinyang Deng,et al.  Supplier selection using AHP methodology extended by D numbers , 2014, Expert Syst. Appl..

[29]  Mehdi Keshavarz Ghorabaee,et al.  A NEW COMBINATIVE DISTANCE-BASED ASSESSMENT(CODAS) METHOD FOR MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION-MAKING , 2016 .

[30]  Dohyun Pak,et al.  Iterative Speedup by Utilizing Symmetric Data in Pricing Options with Two Risky Assets , 2017, Symmetry.

[31]  Serdar Ulubeyli,et al.  Fuzzy multi-criteria decision making model for subcontractor selection in international construction projects , 2015 .

[32]  Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas,et al.  Risk assessment of construction projects , 2010 .

[33]  M. Dulaimi,et al.  Risk management framework for construction projects in developing countries , 2004 .

[34]  Gwang-Hee Kim,et al.  Comparison of Risk Assessment for a Nuclear Power Plant Construction Project Based on Analytic Hierarchy Process and Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process , 2016 .

[35]  Madjid Tavana,et al.  An integrated green supplier selection approach with analytic network process and improved Grey relational analysis , 2015 .

[36]  Wen Jiang,et al.  A Method to Determine Generalized Basic Probability Assignment in the Open World , 2016 .

[37]  Hu-Chen Liu,et al.  An interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy MABAC approach for material selection with incomplete weight information , 2016, Appl. Soft Comput..

[38]  Cláudia Ribeiro,et al.  Occurrence of Chiral Bioactive Compounds in the Aquatic Environment: A Review , 2017, Symmetry.

[39]  Ru-Jen Chao,et al.  Supplier selection using consistent fuzzy preference relations , 2012, Expert Syst. Appl..

[40]  Mehdi Ravanshadnia,et al.  Semi-Ideal Bidding via a Fuzzy TOPSIS Project Evaluation Framework in Risky Environments , 2014 .

[41]  Jian-Bo Yang,et al.  A DST-based approach for construction project risk analysis , 2013, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[42]  Antônio Edésio Jungles,et al.  Risk Level Assessment in Construction Projects Using the Schedule Performance Index , 2016 .

[43]  Seppo Junnila,et al.  Business model renewal in context of integrated solutions delivery: a network perspective , 2017 .

[44]  Yong Yang,et al.  Pythagorean Fuzzy Choquet Integral Based MABAC Method for Multiple Attribute Group Decision Making , 2016, Int. J. Intell. Syst..

[45]  Abbas Mardani,et al.  A new hybrid fuzzy cybernetic analytic network process model to identify shared risks in PPP projects , 2016 .

[46]  Reza Tavakkoli-Moghaddam,et al.  Using the Analytical Network Process to Select the Best Strategy for Reducing Risks in a Supply Chain , 2013 .

[47]  Andrew D.F. Price,et al.  Modelling global risk factors affecting construction cost performance , 2003 .

[48]  Sankaran Mahadevan,et al.  Environmental impact assessment based on D numbers , 2014, Expert Syst. Appl..

[49]  Bon-Gang Hwang,et al.  Risk identification and allocation in underground rail construction joint ventures: contractors’ perspective , 2015 .

[50]  Seyed Mehdi Abtahi,et al.  Risk Management in Supply Chain using Consistent Fuzzy Preference Relations , 2014 .

[51]  Ana Nieto-Morote,et al.  A fuzzy approach to construction project risk assessment , 2011 .

[52]  Ximena Ferrada,et al.  Risk Management in Construction Projects: A Knowledge-based Approach , 2014 .

[53]  Daijun Wei,et al.  A Multi-Attribute Decision Making for Investment Decision Based on D Numbers Methods , 2016 .

[54]  Osama Moselhi,et al.  Risk identification and assessment for engineering procurement construction management projects using fuzzy set theory , 2016 .

[55]  Martin Schieg Risk management in construction project management , 2006 .

[56]  Xi Chen,et al.  A D-VIKOR Method for Medicine Provider Selection , 2014, 2014 Seventh International Joint Conference on Computational Sciences and Optimization.

[57]  Agnieszka Dziadosz,et al.  Risk Analysis in Construction Project - Chosen Methods , 2015 .

[58]  A. Akintoye,et al.  Risk analysis and management in construction , 1997 .

[59]  Dragan Pamucar,et al.  The selection of transport and handling resources in logistics centers using Multi-Attributive Border Approximation area Comparison (MABAC) , 2015, Expert Syst. Appl..

[60]  Hu-Chen Liu,et al.  Failure mode and effects analysis using D numbers and grey relational projection method , 2014, Expert Syst. Appl..

[61]  Guofeng Wen Construction project risk evaluation based on Rough Sets and Artificial Neural Networks , 2010, 2010 Sixth International Conference on Natural Computation.

[62]  Dragan Pamučar,et al.  Application the MABAC method in support of decision-making on the use of force in a defensive operation , 2016 .

[63]  Simona Dzitac,et al.  PRUDENT DECISIONS TO ESTIMATE THE RISK OF LOSS IN INSURANCE , 2017 .

[64]  Aminah Robinson Fayek,et al.  Risk Management in the Construction Industry Using Combined Fuzzy FMEA and Fuzzy AHP , 2010 .

[65]  Terry Lyons,et al.  Project risk management in the Queensland engineering construction industry : a survey , 2004 .

[66]  Wen Jiang,et al.  An Improved Belief Entropy and Its Application in Decision-Making , 2017, Complex..

[67]  Osman Taylan,et al.  Construction projects selection and risk assessment by fuzzy AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS methodologies , 2014, Appl. Soft Comput..

[68]  Sankaran Mahadevan,et al.  Supplier selection based on evidence theory and analytic network process , 2016 .

[69]  Mohsen Ahmadi,et al.  Comprehensive Risk Management using Fuzzy FMEA and MCDA Techniques in Highway Construction Projects , 2016 .

[70]  Mu’azu Mohammed Abdullahi,et al.  DEMATEL-ANP Risk Assessment in Oil and Gas Construction Projects , 2017 .

[71]  Chih-Han Kao,et al.  Success factors for Taiwanese contractors collaborating with local Chinese contractors in construction projects , 2016 .

[72]  Mohammadsadegh Mobin,et al.  An Intuitionistic Fuzzy-Based DEMATEL to Rank Risks of Construction Projects , 2016 .

[73]  Dariusz Skorupka,et al.  Identification and Initial Risk Assessment of Construction Projects in Poland , 2008 .

[74]  S Pamucar Dragan,et al.  Use of the fuzzy AHP-MABAC hybrid model in ranking potential locations for preparing laying-up positions , 2016 .