Analyzing e-government research: Perspectives, philosophies, theories, methods, and practice

Abstract In recent years, there has been rapid growth in the volume of research output on the topic of e-government. To understand this research better, we used content analysis of eighty-four papers in e-government-specific research outlets (two journals and one conference series). Our analytical focus took in five main aspects: perspectives on the impacts of e-government, research philosophy, use of theory, methodology and method, and practical recommendations. Normative evaluation identified some positive features, such as recognition of contextual factors beyond technology, and a diversity of referent domains and ideas. Alongside this, though, research draws mainly from a weak or confused positivism and is dominated by over-optimistic, a-theoretical work that has done little to accumulate either knowledge or practical guidance for e-government. Worse, there is a lack of clarity and lack of rigor about research methods alongside poor treatment of generalization. We suggest ways of strengthening e-government research but also draw out some deeper issues, such as the role of research philosophy and theory, and the institutional factors – particularly pressures of competition and time – that may constrain development of e-government as a research field.

[1]  Richard Heeks,et al.  eGovernment in Africa: Promise and Practice , 2002, Inf. Polity.

[2]  Michael M. Harmon,et al.  Organization theory for public administration , 1986 .

[3]  E. Guba The alternative paradigm dialog. , 1990 .

[4]  A. D. Jankowicz Business research projects , 1995 .

[5]  Venkataraman Ramesh,et al.  Research in Information Systems: An Empirical Study of Diversity in the Discipline and Its Journals , 2002, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[6]  R. A. Rademacher,et al.  The Changing Profile of Information Systems Research: 1995–2000 , 2001, J. Comput. Inf. Syst..

[7]  E. Guba,et al.  The Paradigm dialog , 1990 .

[8]  L. Johnston Template analysis. , 1987, Journal of clinical orthodontics : JCO.

[9]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  Empirical Research in Information Systems: The Practice of Relevance , 1999, MIS Q..

[11]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  Studying Information Technology in Organizations: Research Approaches and Assumptions , 1991, Inf. Syst. Res..

[12]  Jason L. Dedrick,et al.  Computing and Public Organizations , 1986 .

[13]  Michael D. Myers,et al.  Qualitative Research in Information Systems , 1997, MIS Q..

[14]  J. Fountain Information, Institutions and Governance: Advancing a Basic Social Science Research Program for Digital Government , 2003 .

[15]  H. Bussell Qualitative Methods and Analysis in Organizational Research: A Practical Guide , 2000 .

[16]  Kenneth J. Meier,et al.  Public Administration Research and Practice: A Methodological Manifesto , 2000 .

[17]  Peggy Gregory,et al.  The Use of Social Theories in 20 Years of WG 8.2 Empirical Research , 2004, Relevant Theory and Informed Practice.

[18]  M. Easterby-Smith,et al.  Management Research: An Introduction , 1991 .

[19]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  Research Commentary: Rethinking "Diversity" in Information Systems Research , 1996, Inf. Syst. Res..

[20]  Jeremy Rose,et al.  A Roadmap for European Research in Learning and Knowledge Creation in e-Government , 2005, ECEG.

[21]  Donald F. Kettl,et al.  Public Administration at the Millennium: The State of the Field , 2000 .

[22]  Richard Heeks,et al.  Implementing And Managing Egovernment: An International Text , 2005 .

[23]  Åke Grönlund,et al.  Introducing e-Gov: History, Definitions, and Issues , 2005, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[24]  Geoff Walsham,et al.  Information technology in developing countries: A need for theory building∗ , 1995 .

[25]  D. Morgan,et al.  Sociological Paradigms and Organizational Analysis. , 1983 .

[26]  Robert D. Galliers,et al.  Research issues in information systems , 1993, J. Inf. Technol..

[27]  Daniel Lowery,et al.  The Iron Cage of Methodology , 2004 .

[28]  Bonnie Mae Kaplan,et al.  Information systems research: Relevant theory and informed practice , 2004 .

[29]  A. Adam Whatever happened to information systems ethics? Caught between the devil and the deep blue sea , 2004 .

[30]  Harold C. Relyea,et al.  E-gov: introduction and overview , 2002, Gov. Inf. Q..

[31]  E. Burton Swanson,et al.  Information Systems Research Thematics: Submissions to a New Journal, 1987-1992 , 1993, Inf. Syst. Res..

[32]  Catherine Cassell,et al.  Qualitative methods and analysis in organizational research , 1998 .

[33]  Maurice Landry,et al.  A disciplined methodological pluralism for mis research , 1992 .

[34]  Chrisanthi Avgerou,et al.  Information systems: what sort of science is it? , 2000 .

[35]  R. Heeks,et al.  "What Did Giddens and Latour Ever Do For Us?" Academic Writings on Information Systems and Development , 2001 .

[36]  Geoff Walsham,et al.  The Emergence of Interpretivism in IS Research , 1995, Inf. Syst. Res..