Balanced Codon Usage Optimizes Eukaryotic Translational Efficiency

Cellular efficiency in protein translation is an important fitness determinant in rapidly growing organisms. It is widely believed that synonymous codons are translated with unequal speeds and that translational efficiency is maximized by the exclusive use of rapidly translated codons. Here we estimate the in vivo translational speeds of all sense codons from the budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Surprisingly, preferentially used codons are not translated faster than unpreferred ones. We hypothesize that this phenomenon is a result of codon usage in proportion to cognate tRNA concentrations, the optimal strategy in enhancing translational efficiency under tRNA shortage. Our predicted codon–tRNA balance is indeed observed from all model eukaryotes examined, and its impact on translational efficiency is further validated experimentally. Our study reveals a previously unsuspected mechanism by which unequal codon usage increases translational efficiency, demonstrates widespread natural selection for translational efficiency, and offers new strategies to improve synthetic biology.

[1]  Nicholas T. Ingolia,et al.  Ribosome Profiling of Mouse Embryonic Stem Cells Reveals the Complexity and Dynamics of Mammalian Proteomes , 2011, Cell.

[2]  Marcel Salathé,et al.  Assessing Vaccination Sentiments with Online Social Media: Implications for Infectious Disease Dynamics and Control , 2011, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[3]  Jian-Rong Yang,et al.  Impact of translational error-induced and error-free misfolding on the rate of protein evolution , 2010, Molecular systems biology.

[4]  P. Farabaugh,et al.  A comprehensive analysis of translational missense errors in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. , 2010, RNA.

[5]  Piotr Zielenkiewicz,et al.  A Comprehensive, Quantitative, and Genome-Wide Model of Translation , 2010, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[6]  U. Alon,et al.  Cost of unneeded proteins in E. coli is reduced after several generations in exponential growth. , 2010, Molecular cell.

[7]  Nicol N. Schraudolph,et al.  A Role for Codon Order in Translation Dynamics , 2010, Cell.

[8]  Y. Pilpel,et al.  An Evolutionarily Conserved Mechanism for Controlling the Efficiency of Protein Translation , 2010, Cell.

[9]  Colin Echeverría Aitken,et al.  Real-time tRNA transit on single translating ribosomes at codon resolution , 2010, Nature.

[10]  Eytan Ruppin,et al.  Translation efficiency is determined by both codon bias and folding energy , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[11]  Tong Zhou,et al.  A Universal Trend of Reduced mRNA Stability near the Translation-Initiation Site in Prokaryotes and Eukaryotes , 2010, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[12]  Alan Villalobos,et al.  Design Parameters to Control Synthetic Gene Expression in Escherichia coli , 2009, PloS one.

[13]  D. Petrov,et al.  General Rules for Optimal Codon Choice , 2009, PLoS genetics.

[14]  Tong Zhou,et al.  Translationally optimal codons associate with structurally sensitive sites in proteins. , 2009, Molecular biology and evolution.

[15]  Nicholas T. Ingolia,et al.  Genome-Wide Analysis in Vivo of Translation with Nucleotide Resolution Using Ribosome Profiling , 2009, Science.

[16]  P. Green,et al.  Massively parallel sequencing of the polyadenylated transcriptome of C. elegans. , 2009, Genome research.

[17]  Reinhard Wolf,et al.  Coding-Sequence Determinants of Gene Expression in Escherichia coli , 2009 .

[18]  Ruth Hershberg,et al.  Selection on codon bias. , 2008, Annual review of genetics.

[19]  Tobias von der Haar,et al.  A quantitative estimation of the global translational activity in logarithmically growing yeast cells , 2008, BMC Systems Biology.

[20]  Juliane C. Dohm,et al.  Substantial biases in ultra-short read data sets from high-throughput DNA sequencing , 2008, Nucleic acids research.

[21]  Claus O. Wilke,et al.  Mistranslation-Induced Protein Misfolding as a Dominant Constraint on Coding-Sequence Evolution , 2008, Cell.

[22]  I. Goodhead,et al.  Dynamic repertoire of a eukaryotic transcriptome surveyed at single-nucleotide resolution , 2008, Nature.

[23]  Andreas Beyer,et al.  Posttranscriptional Expression Regulation: What Determines Translation Rates? , 2007, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[24]  A. Eyre-Walker,et al.  Synonymous codon usage in Escherichia coli: selection for translational accuracy. , 2006, Molecular biology and evolution.

[25]  Tao Pan,et al.  Tissue-Specific Differences in Human Transfer RNA Expression , 2006, PLoS genetics.

[26]  L. Hurst,et al.  Hearing silence: non-neutral evolution at synonymous sites in mammals , 2006, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[27]  V. Ramakrishnan,et al.  First published online as a Review in Advance on February 25, 2005 STRUCTURAL INSIGHTS INTO TRANSLATIONAL , 2022 .

[28]  R. Tsien,et al.  Improved monomeric red, orange and yellow fluorescent proteins derived from Discosoma sp. red fluorescent protein , 2004, Nature Biotechnology.

[29]  Andreas Beyer,et al.  Post-transcriptional Expression Regulation in the Yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae on a Genomic Scale*S , 2004, Molecular & Cellular Proteomics.

[30]  E. Rocha.  Codon usage bias from tRNA's point of view: redundancy, specialization, and efficient decoding for translation optimization. , 2004, Genome research.

[31]  S. Govindarajan,et al.  Codon bias and heterologous protein expression. , 2004, Trends in biotechnology.

[32]  Xun Gu,et al.  Directional mutational pressure affects the amino acid composition and hydrophobicity of proteins in bacteria , 2004, Genetica.

[33]  G. Heijne,et al.  The tRNA cycle and its relation to the rate of protein synthesis , 2004, European Biophysics Journal.

[34]  Eduardo P C Rocha,et al.  An analysis of determinants of amino acids substitution rates in bacterial proteins. , 2004, Molecular biology and evolution.

[35]  R. Lenski,et al.  The fate of competing beneficial mutations in an asexual population , 2004, Genetica.

[36]  E. O’Shea,et al.  Global analysis of protein expression in yeast , 2003, Nature.

[37]  Hiroshi Akashi,et al.  Translational selection and yeast proteome evolution. , 2003, Genetics.

[38]  Wolfgang Stephan,et al.  In vivo introduction of unpreferred synonymous codons into the Drosophila Adh gene results in reduced levels of ADH protein. , 2003, Genetics.

[39]  J. Novembre.  Accounting for background nucleotide composition when measuring codon usage bias. , 2002, Molecular biology and evolution.

[40]  Takashi Gojobori,et al.  Metabolic efficiency and amino acid composition in the proteomes of Escherichia coli and Bacillus subtilis , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[41]  K. Mikoshiba,et al.  A variant of yellow fluorescent protein with fast and efficient maturation for cell-biological applications , 2002, Nature Biotechnology.

[42]  H. Akashi,et al.  Gene expression and molecular evolution. , 2001, Current opinion in genetics & development.

[43]  N. Chaffey.  Red fluorescent protein , 2001 .

[44]  M. Rodnina,et al.  Fidelity of aminoacyl-tRNA selection on the ribosome: kinetic and structural mechanisms. , 2001, Annual review of biochemistry.

[45]  L. Duret,et al.  tRNA gene number and codon usage in the C. elegans genome are co-adapted for optimal translation of highly expressed genes. , 2000, Trends in genetics : TIG.

[46]  Jianzhi Zhang,et al.  Rates of Conservative and Radical Nonsynonymous Nucleotide Substitutions in Mammalian Nuclear Genes , 2000, Journal of Molecular Evolution.

[47]  J. Warner,et al.  The economics of ribosome biosynthesis in yeast. , 1999, Trends in biochemical sciences.

[48]  Michael R. Green,et al.  Dissecting the Regulatory Circuitry of a Eukaryotic Genome , 1998, Cell.

[49]  Ronald W. Davis,et al.  A genome-wide transcriptional analysis of the mitotic cell cycle. , 1998, Molecular cell.

[50]  J. Powell,et al.  Evolution of codon usage bias in Drosophila. , 1997, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[51]  A. Pavesi,et al.  Transfer RNA gene redundancy and translational selection in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. , 1997, Journal of molecular biology.

[52]  C. Kurland,et al.  Co-variation of tRNA abundance and codon usage in Escherichia coli at different growth rates. , 1996, Journal of molecular biology.

[53]  R. Müller,et al.  Yeast vectors for the controlled expression of heterologous proteins in different genetic backgrounds. , 1995, Gene.

[54]  P. Farabaugh,et al.  Special peptidyl-tRNA molecules can promote translational frameshifting without slippage , 1994, Molecular and cellular biology.

[55]  H. Akashi.  Synonymous codon usage in Drosophila melanogaster: natural selection and translational accuracy. , 1994, Genetics.

[56]  M. Bulmer.  The selection-mutation-drift theory of synonymous codon usage. , 1991, Genetics.

[57]  C. Kurland,et al.  Codon preferences in free-living microorganisms. , 1990, Microbiological reviews.

[58]  F. Wright.  The 'effective number of codons' used in a gene. , 1990, Gene.

[59]  M Yarus,et al.  Rates of aminoacyl-tRNA selection at 29 sense codons in vivo. , 1989, Journal of molecular biology.

[60]  C. Kurland,et al.  Codon usage determines translation rate in Escherichia coli. , 1989, Journal of molecular biology.

[61]  D C Shields,et al.  Codon usage patterns in Escherichia coli, Bacillus subtilis, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Schizosaccharomyces pombe, Drosophila melanogaster and Homo sapiens; a review of the considerable within-species diversity. , 1988, Nucleic acids research.

[62]  J. Parker,et al.  Missense misreading of asparagine codons as a function of codon identity and context. , 1987, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[63]  M. Bulmer,et al.  Coevolution of codon usage and transfer RNA abundance , 1987, Nature.

[64]  P. Sharp,et al.  The codon Adaptation Index--a measure of directional synonymous codon usage bias, and its potential applications. , 1987, Nucleic acids research.

[65]  Paul M. Sharp,et al.  Codon usage in yeast: cluster analysis clearly differentiates highly and lowly expressed genes , 1986, Nucleic Acids Res..

[66]  T. Ikemura.  Codon usage and tRNA content in unicellular and multicellular organisms. , 1985, Molecular biology and evolution.

[67]  R. Lloubès,et al.  Translation is a non-uniform process. Effect of tRNA availability on the rate of elongation of nascent polypeptide chains. , 1984, Journal of molecular biology.

[68]  G Humphreys,et al.  Codon usage can affect efficiency of translation of genes in Escherichia coli. , 1984, Nucleic acids research.

[69]  E. Goldman,et al.  Quantities of individual aminoacyl-tRNA families and their turnover in Escherichia coli , 1984, Journal of bacteriology.

[70]  T. Ikemura.  Correlation between the abundance of yeast transfer RNAs and the occurrence of the respective codons in protein genes. Differences in synonymous codon choice patterns of yeast and Escherichia coli with reference to the abundance of isoaccepting transfer RNAs. , 1982, Journal of molecular biology.

[71]  T. Ikemura.  Correlation between the abundance of Escherichia coli transfer RNAs and the occurrence of the respective codons in its protein genes: a proposal for a synonymous codon choice that is optimal for the E. coli translational system. , 1981, Journal of molecular biology.

[72]  J. Friesen,et al.  Cellular content of ribonucleic acid and protein in Saccharomyces cerevisiae as a function of exponential growth rate: calculation of the apparent peptide chain elongation rate , 1975, Journal of bacteriology.

[73]  J. Forchhammer,et al.  Growth rate of polypeptide chains as a function of the cell growth rate in a mutant of Escherichia coli 15. , 1971, Journal of molecular biology.