Prediction of frequency-dependent ultrasonic backscatter in cancellous bone using statistical weak scattering model.

The goal of this study was to propose a model for the ultrasonic frequency-dependent backscatter coefficient in cancellous bone. This model allows us to address the inverse problem and to predict the mean trabecular thickness. A weak scattering model is used and the backscatter coefficient is expressed in terms of an autocorrelation function of the medium. Different autocorrelation functions (Gaussian, exponential and densely populated media) were used to compute the backscatter coefficient and comparison is made with experimental data for 19 specimens and for frequency ranging from 0.4 to 1.2 MHz. For each specimen, a nonlinear regression was performed and the mean trabecular thickness is estimated. Experimental data and theoretical predictions were averaged over the 19 specimens. A good agreement between experimental data and predictions was found for both the magnitude and the frequency-dependence of the backscatter coefficient. We also found a good agreement between the experimental mean trabecular thickness (Tb. Th = 130 +/- 6.5 micro m) derived from the analysis of bone 3-D microarchitecture using high-resolution microtomography and theoretical predictions (d(Gauss) = 140 +/- 10 micro m, d(exponential) = 153 +/- 12.5 micro m and d(dense) = 138 +/- 6.5 micro m). These results open interesting prospects for the estimation of the mean trabecular thickness from in vivo measurements.

[1]  P. Rüegsegger,et al.  In vivo reproducibility of three‐dimensional structural properties of noninvasive bone biopsies using 3D‐pQCT , 1996, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[2]  Pascal Laugier,et al.  Clinical assessment of the backscatter coefficient in osteoporosis , 1997, 1997 IEEE Ultrasonics Symposium Proceedings. An International Symposium (Cat. No.97CH36118).

[3]  F. Peyrin,et al.  Frequency dependence of ultrasonic backscattering in cancellous bone: autocorrelation model and experimental results. , 2000, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[4]  M. Insana,et al.  Modeling acoustic backscatter from kidney microstructure using an anisotropic correlation function. , 1995, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[5]  A. Hosokawa,et al.  Ultrasonic wave propagation in bovine cancellous bone. , 1997, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[6]  J. Thoen,et al.  Propagation of ultrasonic pulses through trabecular bone , 1994 .

[7]  Pascal Laugier,et al.  Measurement of integrated backscatter coefficient of trabecular bone , 1996, 1996 IEEE Ultrasonics Symposium. Proceedings.

[8]  P Rüegsegger,et al.  Do quantitative ultrasound measurements reflect structure independently of density in human vertebral cancellous bone? , 1998, Bone.

[9]  K. Wear Fundamental precision limitations for measurements of frequency dependence of backscatter: applications in tissue-mimicking phantoms and trabecular bone. , 2001, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[10]  C. Nahmias,et al.  In vivo assessment of trabecular bone structure at the distal radius from high-resolution magnetic resonance images. , 1997, Medical physics.

[11]  F Peyrin,et al.  Ultrasonic characterization of human cancellous bone using transmission and backscatter measurements: relationships to density and microstructure. , 2002, Bone.

[12]  M. Fink,et al.  Multiple scattering of sound , 2000 .

[13]  M. L. McKelvie Ultrasonic propagation in cancellous bone. , 1988 .

[14]  E. Feleppa,et al.  Theoretical framework for spectrum analysis in ultrasonic tissue characterization. , 1983, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[15]  C. Benhamou,et al.  Fractal Analysis of Trabecular Bone Texture on Radiographs: Discriminant Value in Postmenopausal Osteoporosis , 1998, Osteoporosis International.

[16]  P H Nicholson,et al.  A model for ultrasonic scattering in cancellous bone based on velocity fluctuations in a binary mixture. , 1998, Physiological measurement.

[17]  R. A. Schmiedt,et al.  Measures of tuning and suppression in single-fiber and whole-nerve responses in young and quiet-aged gerbils. , 1996, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[18]  J. Faran Sound Scattering by Solid Cylinders and Spheres , 1951 .

[19]  E. Feleppa,et al.  Statistical framework for ultrasonic spectral parameter imaging. , 1997, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[20]  T J Hall,et al.  Identifying acoustic scattering sources in normal renal parenchyma from the anisotropy in acoustic properties. , 1991, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[21]  S. Majumdar,et al.  In Vivo High Resolution MRI of the Calcaneus: Differences in Trabecular Structure in Osteoporosis Patients , 1998, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[22]  G Berger,et al.  In vitro assessment of the relationship between acoustic properties and bone mass density of the calcaneus by comparison of ultrasound parametric imaging and quantitative computed tomography. , 1997, Bone.

[23]  R. Harba,et al.  Fractal organization of trabecular bone images on calcaneus radiographs , 1994, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[24]  M. Giger,et al.  Multifractal radiographic analysis of osteoporosis. , 1994, Medical physics.

[25]  P. Laugier,et al.  Prediction of ultrasound attenuation in cancellous bones using poroelasticity and scattering theories , 2001, 2001 IEEE Ultrasonics Symposium. Proceedings. An International Symposium (Cat. No.01CH37263).

[26]  K. Wear,et al.  Anisotropy of ultrasonic backscatter and attenuation from human calcaneus: implications for relative roles of absorption and scattering in determining attenuation. , 2000, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[27]  P. Laugier,et al.  Velocity dispersion of acoustic waves in cancellous bone , 1998, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[28]  Uriel Frisch,et al.  WAVE PROPAGATION IN RANDOM MEDIA. , 1970 .

[29]  P R White,et al.  Ultrasonic propagation in cancellous bone: a new stratified model. , 1999, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[30]  S. Majumdar,et al.  Correlation of Trabecular Bone Structure with Age, Bone Mineral Density, and Osteoporotic Status: In Vivo Studies in the Distal Radius Using High Resolution Magnetic Resonance Imaging , 1997, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[31]  F. Peyrin,et al.  Prediction of backscatter coefficient in trabecular bones using a numerical model of three-dimensional microstructure. , 2003, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[32]  R. F. Wagner,et al.  Describing small-scale structure in random media using pulse-echo ultrasound. , 1990, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[33]  S. Palmer,et al.  The interaction of ultrasound with cancellous bone. , 1991, Physics in medicine and biology.

[34]  C R Hill,et al.  The use of angular acoustic scattering measurements to estimate structural parameters of human and animal tissues. , 1986, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[35]  F. Dunn,et al.  Letter: Correlation of echographic visualizability of tissue with biological composition and physiological state. , 1973, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[36]  G. Breart,et al.  Ultrasonographic heel measurements to predict hip fracture in elderly women: the EPIDOS prospective study , 1996, The Lancet.

[37]  T Loussot,et al.  Anisotropy measurements obtained by fractal analysis of trabecular bone at the calcaneus and radius. , 1996, Revue du rhumatisme.

[38]  B. Garra,et al.  Assessment of bone density using ultrasonic backscatter. , 1998, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[39]  R Porcher,et al.  Ultrasonic Backscatter and Transmission Parameters at the Os Calcis in Postmenopausal Osteoporosis , 2001, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[40]  S. Majumdar,et al.  Magnetic resonance imaging of trabecular bone structure in the distal radius: Relationship with X-ray tomographic microscopy and biomechanics , 2005, Osteoporosis International.

[41]  K. Wear Frequency dependence of ultrasonic backscatter from human trabecular bone: theory and experiment. , 1999, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[42]  M. Insana,et al.  Error bounds on ultrasonic scatterer size estimates. , 1996, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[43]  F. V. Van Ginkel,et al.  The radiographic trabecular pattern of hips in patients with hip fractures and in elderly control subjects. , 1998, Bone.

[44]  J. Williams Ultrasonic wave propagation in cancellous and cortical bone: prediction of some experimental results by Biot's theory. , 1992, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[45]  M. Bouxsein,et al.  Scattering of ultrasound in cancellous bone: predictions from a theoretical model. , 2000, Journal of biomechanics.

[46]  Mathias Fink,et al.  Transport parameters for an ultrasonic pulsed wave propagating in a multiple scattering medium , 2000 .

[47]  K. Wear,et al.  The relationship between ultrasonic backscatter and bone mineral density in human calcaneus , 2000, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.