Schema‐driven source misattribution errors: remembering the expected from a witnessed event

When recollection is difficult, people may use schematic processing to enhance memory. Two experiments showed that a delay between witnessing and recalling a visual sequence increases schematic processing, resulting in stereotypic memory errors. Participants watched a slide show of a man and a woman performing stereotype-consistent and stereotype-inconsistent actions, followed by an immediate or delayed memory test. Over a two-day delay, stereotype-inconsistent actions were increasingly misremembered as having been performed by the stereotype-consistent actor (Experiment 1). All the source errors increased, regardless of stereotype consistency, when the wrong actor was suggested. When we merely suggested that ‘someone’ performed an action (Experiment 2), only stereotype-consistent source errors were increased. Although visual scenes are typically well remembered, these results suggest that when memory fades, reliance on schemata increases, leading to increased stereotypic memory errors. Copyright © 2007 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

[1]  B. P. Allen,et al.  Eyewitness suggestibility and source similarity: Intrusions of details from one event into memory reports of another event ☆ , 2004 .

[2]  Raymond S. Nickerson,et al.  A note on long-term recognition memory for pictorial material , 1968 .

[3]  Francis T. Durso,et al.  Effect of schema-incongruent information on memory for stereotypical attributes. , 1984, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[4]  John B. Black,et al.  Scripts in memory for text , 1979, Cognitive Psychology.

[5]  C. A. Morgan,et al.  Accuracy of eyewitness memory for persons encountered during exposure to highly intense stress. , 2004, International journal of law and psychiatry.

[6]  M. Kaplan,et al.  The Effects of Racially Stereotypical Crimes on Juror Decision-Making and Information-Processing Strategies , 2003 .

[7]  L. Jacoby,et al.  Prejudice and perception: the role of automatic and controlled processes in misperceiving a weapon. , 2001, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[8]  D. Wegner,et al.  Control and automaticity in social life. , 1998 .

[9]  James R. Riha,et al.  Script processing in a natural situation , 1985, Memory & cognition.

[10]  P. Devine Stereotypes and prejudice: Their automatic and controlled components. , 1989 .

[11]  V. L. Smith,et al.  What do you expect?: The influence of people's prior knowledge of crime categories on fact-finding , 1996 .

[12]  Alice H. Eagly,et al.  Heuristic and systematic information processing within and beyond the persuasion context. , 1989 .

[13]  Kevin J. Hawley,et al.  Perceptual inhibition of expected inputs: The key that opens closed minds , 1994, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[14]  Marcia K. Johnson,et al.  Affective review and schema reliance in memory in older and younger adults. , 2003, The American journal of psychology.

[15]  Michael P. Toglia,et al.  Recollections of things schematic: The influence of scripts on recollective experience , 2000 .

[16]  Kathy Pezdek,et al.  Scripts for typical crimes and their effects on memory for eyewitness testimony , 1992 .

[17]  N. Franklin,et al.  Reality monitoring of physically similar and conceptually related objects , 1998, Memory & cognition.

[18]  Astrid M. Schloerscheidt,et al.  Tales of the unexpected: executive function and person perception. , 1999, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[19]  Mara Mather,et al.  (www.interscience.wiley.com) DOI: 10.1002/acp.857 Source Monitoring and Suggestibility to Misinformation: Adult Age-Related Differences , 2022 .

[20]  S. Fiske,et al.  The Handbook of Social Psychology , 1935 .

[21]  Marcia K. Johnson,et al.  Importing perceived features into false memories , 2006, Memory.

[22]  R. Belli,et al.  The influence of schematic knowledge on contradictory versus additive misinformation: false memory for typical and atypical items , 2006 .

[23]  H L Roediger,et al.  Social contagion of memory , 2001, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[24]  A G Greenwald,et al.  Implicit gender stereotyping in judgments of fame. , 1995, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[25]  B. W. Whittlesea,et al.  The heuristic basis of remembering and classification: fluency, generation, and resemblance. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[26]  E F Loftus,et al.  Semantic integration of verbal information into a visual memory. , 1978, Journal of experimental psychology. Human learning and memory.

[27]  J. Hicks,et al.  The effect of general knowledge on source memory and decision processes , 2003 .

[28]  A. Pickering,et al.  Characteristics of eyewitness identification that predict the outcome of real lineups , 2003 .

[29]  W. Brewer,et al.  Role of schemata in memory for places , 1981, Cognitive Psychology.

[30]  M. Greenberg,et al.  When Believing Is Seeing: The Effect of Scripts on Eyewitness Memory , 1998, Law and human behavior.

[31]  Marcia K. Johnson,et al.  Reality Monitoring , 2005 .

[32]  Jeffrey W. Sherman,et al.  Stereotypes as Source-Monitoring Cues: On the Interaction Between Episodic and Semantic Memory , 1999 .

[33]  V. Reyna,et al.  Fuzzy-trace theory: An interim synthesis , 1995 .

[34]  Marcia K. Johnson,et al.  STEREOTYPE RELIANCE IN SOURCE MONITORING: AGE DIFFERENCES AND NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TEST CORRELATES , 1999 .

[35]  E. Plant,et al.  The Consequences of Race for Police Officers' Responses to Criminal Suspects , 2005, Psychological science.

[36]  Neil Brewer,et al.  The influence of schemas, stimulus ambiguity, and interview schedule on eyewitness memory over time. , 2002, Journal of experimental psychology. Applied.

[37]  C. Alberini,et al.  Memory , 2006, Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences CMLS.

[38]  J. Neuschatz,et al.  The effect of memory schemata on memory and the phenomenological experience of naturalistic situations , 2002 .

[39]  Marcia K. Johnson,et al.  Source monitoring. , 1993, Psychological bulletin.

[40]  L. Postman,et al.  The basic psychology of rumor. , 1945, Transactions of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[41]  Jeffrey W. Sherman,et al.  Attention and Stereotyping: Cognitive Constraints on the Construction of Meaningful Social Impressions , 2000 .

[42]  Kathy Pezdek,et al.  Memory for Real-World Scenes: The Role of Consistency With Schema Expectation , 1989 .

[43]  Astrid M. Schloerscheidt,et al.  Creating memory illusions: Expectancy-based processing and the generation of false memories , 2002, Memory.

[44]  Barbara Anne Dosher,et al.  A comparison of conscious and automatic memory processes for picture and word stimuli: A process dissociation analysis , 2002, Consciousness and Cognition.

[45]  K. Pezdek,et al.  Development differences in the role of detail in picture recognition memory. , 1982, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[46]  V. Reyna,et al.  Conjoint recognition and phantom recollection. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[47]  S. Lane,et al.  Processing resources and eyewitness suggestibility , 1998 .

[48]  E. Balint Memory and consciousness. , 1987, The International journal of psycho-analysis.

[49]  Sheri Lynn Johnson,et al.  Looking Deathworthy , 2006, Psychological science.

[50]  L. Postman,et al.  SECTION OF PSYCHOLOGY: The Basic Psychology of Rumor , 1945 .

[51]  Juliana K. Leding,et al.  Compelling untruths: content borrowing and vivid false memories. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[52]  E. Heit Modeling the Effects of Expectations on Recognition Memory , 1993 .

[53]  S. Nicolas The picture-superiority effect in category-association tests , 1995 .

[54]  P. Frost,et al.  The quality of false memory over time: Is memory for misinformation “remembered” or “known”? , 2000, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[55]  K. Pezdek Cross-Modality Semantic Integration of Sentence and Picture Memory , 2005 .

[56]  The heuristic basis of remembering and classification: fluency, generation, and resemblance. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. General.