Comparative analysis by independent contrasts (CAIC): an Apple Macintosh application for analysing comparative data

CAIC is an application for the Apple Macintosh which allows the valid analysis of comparative (multi-species) data sets that include continuous variables. Comparison among species is the most common technique for testing hypotheses of how organisms are adapted to their environments, but standard statistical tests like regression should not be used with species data. Such tests assume independence of data points, but related species often share traits by common descent rather than through independent adaptation. CAIC uses a phylogeny of the species in the data set to partition the variance among species into independent comparisons (technically, linear contrasts), each comparison being made at a different node in the phylogeny. There are two partitioning procedures--one used when all variables are continuous, the other when one variable is discrete. The resulting comparisons can be analysed validly in standard statistical packages to test hypotheses about correlated evolution among traits, to estimate parameters such as allometric exponents, and to compare rates of evolution. Previous versions of the package have already been used widely; this version is simpler to use and works on a wider range of machines. The package and manual are freely available by anonymous ftp or from the authors.

[1]  Theodore Garland,et al.  Phylogenetic Analysis of Covariance by Computer Simulation , 1993 .

[2]  Mark Kot,et al.  Adaptation: Statistics and a Null Model for Estimating Phylogenetic Effects , 1990 .

[3]  M. Pagel,et al.  Comparative methods for examining adaptation depend on evolutionary models. , 1989, Folia primatologica; international journal of primatology.

[4]  T. E. Martin Evolutionary Determinants of Clutch Size in Cavity-Nesting Birds: Nest Predation or Limited Breeding Opportunities? , 1993, The American Naturalist.

[5]  David P. Mindell,et al.  MacClade: Analysis of Phylogeny and Character Evolution. Version 3.0 Wayne P. Maddison David R. Maddison , 1994 .

[6]  T. Garland,et al.  PHYLOGENETIC ANALYSES OF THE CORRELATED EVOLUTION OF CONTINUOUS CHARACTERS: A SIMULATION STUDY , 1991, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[7]  D. Penny The comparative method in evolutionary biology , 1992 .

[8]  J. Felsenstein Phylogenies and the Comparative Method , 1985, The American Naturalist.

[9]  W. Maddison RECONSTRUCTING CHARACTER EVOLUTION ON POLYTOMOUS CLADOGRAMS , 1989, Cladistics : the international journal of the Willi Hennig Society.

[10]  R. Byrne,et al.  Machiavellian intelligence : social expertise and the evolution of intellect in monkeys, apes, and humans , 1990 .

[11]  T. Garland Rate Tests for Phenotypic Evolution Using Phylogenetically Independent Contrasts , 1992, The American Naturalist.

[12]  E. García‐Barros Egg size variation in European Satyrine butterflies (Nymphalidae, Satyrinae) , 1994 .

[13]  J. L. Gittleman,et al.  Truth or Consequences: Effects of Phylogenetic Accuracy on Two Comparative Methods , 1994 .

[14]  A. Grafen The phylogenetic regression. , 1989, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[15]  J. Felsenstein Phylogenies and quantitative characters , 1988 .

[16]  T. Garland,et al.  Polytomies in Comparative Analyses of Continuous Characters , 1993 .

[17]  P. Martins CONTINUOUS CHARACTERS: A SIMULATION STUDY , 1991 .

[18]  T. Garland,et al.  Procedures for the Analysis of Comparative Data Using Phylogenetically Independent Contrasts , 1992 .

[19]  A. Burt Comparative methods using phylogenetically independent contrasts , 1989 .

[20]  Emília P. Martins,et al.  Estimating the Rate of Phenotypic Evolution from Comparative Data , 1994, The American Naturalist.

[21]  S. Emerson Testing Pattern Predictions of Sexual Selection: A Frog Example , 1994, The American Naturalist.

[22]  P. Harvey,et al.  Mammal life‐history evolution: a comparative test of Charnov's model , 1995 .

[23]  J. L. Gittleman,et al.  On Comparing Comparative Methods , 1992 .

[24]  M. Pagel A method for the analysis of comparative data , 1992 .