The responses of leaf conductance, leaf water potential and rates of transpiration and net photosynthesis at different vapour pressure deficits ranging from 10 to 30 Pa kPa-1 were followed in the sclerophyllous woody shrub Nerium oleander L. as the extractable soil water content decreased. When the vapour pressure deficit around a plant was kept constant at 25 Pa kPa-1 as the soil water content decreased, the leaf conductance and transpiration rate showed a marked closing response to leaf water potential at-1.1 to-1.2 MPa, whereas when the vapour pressure deficit around the plant was kept constant at 10 Pa kPa-1, leaf conductance decreased almost linearly from-0.4 to-1.1 MPa. Increasing the vapour pressure deficit from 10 to 30 Pa kPa-1 in 5 Pa kPa-1 steps, decreased leaf conductance at all exchangeable soil water contents. Changing the leaf water potential in a single leaf by exposing the remainder of the plant to a high rate of transpiration decreased the water potential of that leaf, but did not influence leaf conductance when the soil water content was high. As the soil water content was decreased, leaf conductances and photosynthetic rates were higher at equal levels of water potential when the decrease in potential was caused by short-term increases in transpiration than when the potential was decreased by soil drying.As the soil dried and the stomata closed, the rate of photosynthesis decreased with a decrease in the internal carbon dioxide partial pressure, but neither the net photosynthetic rate nor the internal CO2 partial pressure were affected by low water potentials resulting from short-term increases in the rate of transpiration. Leaf conductance, transpiration rate and net photosynthetic rate showed no unique relationship to leaf water potential, but in all experiments the leaf gas exchange decreased when about one half of the extractable soil water had been utilized. We conclude that soil water status rather than leaf water status controls leaf gas exchange in N. oleander.
[1]
R. Sedgley,et al.
Transpiration and leaf water potentials of wheat in relation to changing soil water potential
,
1977
.
[2]
W. Ruhland.
Encyclopedia of plant physiology.
,
1958
.
[3]
E. Schulze,et al.
Short-term and long-term effects of plant water deficits on stomatal response to humidity in Corylus avellana L.
,
2004,
Planta.
[4]
E. Martin.
EFFECT OF SOIL MOISTURE ON GROWTH AND TRANSPIRATION IN HELIANTHUS ANNUUS.
,
1940,
Plant physiology.
[5]
J. Ritchie.
ATMOSPHERIC AND SOIL WATER INFLUENCES ON THE PLANT WATER BALANCE
,
1974
.
[6]
F. J. Veihmeyer,et al.
Soil Moisture in Relation to Plant Growth
,
1950
.
[7]
Paul J. Kramer,et al.
Water Relations of Plants
,
1983
.
[8]
A. Hall,et al.
Stomatal closure with soil water depletion not associated with changes in Bulk leaf water status
,
1981,
Oecologia.
[9]
E. B. Knipling,et al.
Isopiestic Technique for Measuring Leaf Water Potentials with a Thermocouple Psychrometer
,
1965,
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[10]
E. Schulze,et al.
Comparison of water potentials measured by in situ psychrometry and pressure chamber in morphologically different species.
,
1984,
Plant physiology.
[11]
I. R. Cowan.
Stomatal Behaviour and Environment
,
1978
.
[12]
O. T. Denmead.
Availability of soil water to plants
,
1961
.
[13]
Neil C. Turner,et al.
The responses of stomata and leaf gas exchange to vapour pressure deficits and soil water content
,
1984,
Oecologia.