HOW DO LEARNERS PERCEIVE INTERACTIONAL FEEDBACK?

Theoretical claims about the benefits of conversational interaction have been made by Gass (1997), Long (1996), Pica (1994), and others. The Interaction Hypothesis suggests that negotiated interaction can facilitate SLA and that one reason for this could be that, during interaction, learners may receive feedback on their utterances. An interesting issue, which has challenged interactional research, concerns how learners perceive feedback and whether their perceptions affect their subsequent L2 development. The present research addresses the first of these issues–learners' perceptions about interactional feedback. The study, involving 10 learners of English as a second language and 7 learners of Italian as a foreign language, explores learners' perceptions about feedback provided to them through task-based dyadic interaction. Learners received feedback focused on a range of morphosyntactic, lexical, and phonological forms. After completing the tasks, learners watched videotapes of their previous interactions and were asked to introspect about their thoughts at the time the original interactions were in progress. The results showed that learners were relatively accurate in their perceptions about lexical, semantic, and phonological feedback. However, morphosyntactic feedback was generally not perceived as such. Furthermore, the nature as well as the content of the feedback may have affected learners' perceptions.

[1]  R. Oliver.  Negative Feedback in Child NS-NNS Conversation , 1995, Studies in Second Language Acquisition.

[2]  K. A. Ericsson,et al.  Protocol Analysis: Verbal Reports as Data , 1984 .

[3]  Alison Mackey,et al.  Conversational Interaction and Second Language Development: Recasts, Responses, and Red Herrings? , 1998 .

[4]  M. Swain.  Communicative competence : Some roles of comprehensible input and comprehensible output in its development , 1985 .

[5]  Rod Ellis,et al.  Classroom Interaction, Comprehension, and the Acquisition of L2 Word Meanings , 1994 .

[6]  J. Truscott,et al.  Noticing in second language acquisition: a critical review , 1998 .

[7]  R. Schmidt.  The role of consciousness in second language learning , 1990 .

[8]  M. Swain,et al.  Interaction and Second Language Learning: Two Adolescent French Immersion Students Working Together , 1998 .

[9]  Michael H. Long.  INPUT, INTERACTION, AND SECOND‐LANGUAGE ACQUISITION , 1981 .

[10]  Guy Cook,et al.  Principle and Practice in Applied Linguistics: Studies in Honour of H. G. Widdowson , 1995 .

[11]  M. Swain.  Three functions of output in second language learning , 1995 .

[12]  Alison Green,et al.  Verbal Protocol Analysis in Language Testing Research: A Handbook , 1998 .

[13]  Alison Mackey,et al.  INPUT, INTERACTION, AND SECOND LANGUAGE DEVELOPMENT , 1999, Studies in Second Language Acquisition.

[14]  Jacquelyn Schachter,et al.  THREE APPROACHES TO THE STUDY OF INPUT , 1986 .

[15]  T. Pica.  Research on Negotiation: What Does It Reveal about Second-Language Learning Conditions, Processes, and Outcomes?. , 1994 .

[16]  Susan M. Gass,et al.  Input, interaction, and the second language learner , 1994 .

[17]  B. D. Schwartz.  On Explicit and Negative Data Effecting and Affecting Competence and Linguistic Behavior , 1993, Studies in Second Language Acquisition.

[18]  Susan M. Gass,et al.  Input, Interaction, and Second Language Production , 1994, Studies in Second Language Acquisition.

[19]  P. Robinson.  Learning Simple and Complex Second Language Rules Under Implicit, Incidental, Rule-Search, and Instructed Conditions , 1996, Studies in Second Language Acquisition.

[20]  R. Lyster.  RECASTS, REPETITION, AND AMBIGUITY IN L2 CLASSROOM DISCOURSE , 1998, Studies in Second Language Acquisition.

[21]  M. Saxton.  The Contrast Theory of negative input , 1997, Journal of Child Language.

[22]  Jenefer Philp,et al.  Interaction, noticing and second language acquisition : an examination of learners' noticing of recasts in task-based interaction , 1998 .

[23]  R. Leow.  The Effects of Amount and Type of Exposure on Adult Learners' L2 Development in SLA , 1998 .

[24]  Lydia White.  Against Comprehensible Input: the Input Hypothesis and the Development of Second-language Competence1 , 1987 .

[25]  R. Leow.  Attention, Awareness, and Foreign Language Behavior , 1997 .

[26]  Evelyn Marcussen Hatch,et al.  Psycholinguistics: A Second Language Perspective , 1983 .

[27]  R. Schmidt.  Awareness and Second Language Acquisition , 1992, Annual Review of Applied Linguistics.

[28]  R. Lyster,et al.  CORRECTIVE FEEDBACK AND LEARNER UPTAKE , 1997, Studies in Second Language Acquisition.

[29]  Alison Mackey,et al.  The Role of Input and Interaction in Second Language Acquisition Introduction to the Special Issue , 1998 .

[30]  Alison Mackey.  Interactional feedback on L2 morpho-syntax:Learners' perceptions and developmental outcomes , 2000 .

[31]  K. A. Ericsson,et al.  Protocol analysis: Verbal reports as data, Rev. ed. , 1993 .

[32]  S. Gass.  Integrating Research Areas: A Framework for Second Language Studies1 , 1988 .

[33]  Michael H. Long.  The Role of the Linguistic Environment in Second Language Acquisition , 1996 .

[34]  S. Gass,et al.  Stimulated Recall Methodology in Second Language Research , 2000 .

[35]  R. Leow.  Toward operationalizing the process of attention in SLA: Evidence for Tomlin and Villa's (1994) finegrained analysis of attention , 1998, Applied Psycholinguistics.

[36]  Guy Aston,et al.  TROUBLE-SHOOTING IN INTERACTION WITH LEARNERS: THE MORE THE MERRIER? , 1986 .

[37]  R. S. Tomlin,et al.  Attention in Cognitive Science and Second Language Acquisition , 1994, Studies in Second Language Acquisition.

[38]  Lester C. Loschky,et al.  Comprehensible Input and Second Language Acquisition , 1994, Studies in Second Language Acquisition.