Review of the long-term disability associated with hip fractures

Objectives To determine the proportion of hip fracture patients who experience long-term disability and to re-estimate the resulting burden of disease associated with hip fractures in Australia in 2003. Methods A literature review of the functional outcome following a hip fracture (keywords: morbidity, treatment outcome, disability, quality of life, recovery of function, hip fractures, and femoral neck fractures) was carried out using PubMed and Ovid MEDLINE. Results A range of scales and outcome measures are used to evaluate recovery following a hip fracture. Based on the available evidence on restrictions in activities of daily living, 29% of hip fracture cases in the elderly do not reach their pre-fracture levels 1 year post-fracture. Those who do recover tend to reach their pre-fracture levels of functioning at around 6 months. These new assumptions result in 8251 years lived with disability for hip fractures in Australia in 2003, a 4.5-fold increase compared with the previous calculation based on Global Burden of Disease assumptions that only 5% of hip fractures lead to long-term disability and that the duration of short-term disability is just 51 days. Conclusions The original assumptions used in burden of disease studies grossly underestimate the long-term disability from hip fractures. The long-term consequences of other injuries may similarly have been underestimated and need to be re-examined. This has important implications for modelling the cost-effectiveness of preventive interventions where disability-adjusted life years are used as a measure of health outcome.

[1]  T. Vos,et al.  An alternative approach to projecting health expenditure in Australia. , 2008, Australian health review : a publication of the Australian Hospital Association.

[2]  Alan D. Lopez,et al.  Burden of disease and injury in Australia in the new millennium: measuring health loss from diseases, injuries and risk factors , 2008, The Medical journal of Australia.

[3]  Majid Ezzati,et al.  Global Burden of Disease 2005: call for collaborators , 2007, The Lancet.

[4]  Jeff Richardson,et al.  An evaluation of the Assessment of Quality of Life utility instrument as a measure of the impact of injury on health-related quality of life , 2005, International journal of injury control and safety promotion.

[5]  Kerrie M. Sanders,et al.  The human cost of fracture , 2005, Osteoporosis International.

[6]  A. Woolf,et al.  Quality of life, morbidity, and mortality after low trauma hip fracture in men , 2005, Annals of the rheumatic diseases.

[7]  S. Kawai,et al.  Factors Affecting Ambulatory Status and Survival of Patients 90 Years and Older with Hip Fractures , 2005, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[8]  H. Sharma,et al.  Gender differences in patients with hip fracture: a greater risk of morbidity and mortality in men. , 2005, Journal of orthopaedic trauma.

[9]  Su-Yu Chang,et al.  Functional recovery among elderly people one year after hip fracture surgery. , 2004, The journal of nursing research : JNR.

[10]  Jersey Liang,et al.  Predictors of functional recovery for hip fractured elders during 12 months following hospital discharge: a prospective study on a Taiwanese sample , 2004, Osteoporosis International.

[11]  R. Iorio,et al.  Displaced femoral neck fractures in the elderly: disposition and outcome after 3- to 6-year follow-up evaluation. , 2004, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[12]  L. Nordsletten,et al.  Consequences of hip fracture on activities of daily life and residential needs , 2004, Osteoporosis International.

[13]  I. Cameron,et al.  Evidence‐based guidelines for fixing broken hips: an update , 2003, The Medical journal of Australia.

[14]  M. Parker,et al.  Functional outcome after hip fracture. A 1-year prospective outcome study of 275 patients. , 2003, Injury.

[15]  Sheryl Zimmerman,et al.  Changes in functional status attributable to hip fracture: a comparison of hip fracture patients to community-dwelling aged. , 2003, American journal of epidemiology.

[16]  J. Kanis,et al.  A Systematic Review of Health State Utility Values for Osteoporosis-Related Conditions , 2002, Osteoporosis International.

[17]  S. Gabriel,et al.  Mortality, Disability, and Nursing Home Use for Persons with and without Hip Fracture: A Population‐Based Study , 2002, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society.

[18]  C R Palmer,et al.  Quality improvement for patients with hip fracture: experience from a multi-site audit , 2002, Quality & safety in health care.

[19]  N. Zethraeus,et al.  Femoral neck fractures in the elderly: Functional outcome and quality of life according to EuroQol , 2002, Quality of Life Research.

[20]  P. Kirke,et al.  Outcome of hip fracture in older Irish women: a 2-year follow-up of subjects in a case-control study. , 2002, Injury.

[21]  C. Krettek,et al.  Reduction and Fixation of Displaced Intracapsular Fractures of the Proximal Femur , 2002, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[22]  R. Sanderman,et al.  Recovery of physical function after limb injuries in independent older people living at home. , 2001, Age and ageing.

[23]  S. Zimmerman,et al.  Recovery from hip fracture in eight areas of function. , 2000, The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences.

[24]  P. Peeters,et al.  Functional results after treatment of hip fracture: a multicentre, prospective study in 215 patients. , 2000, The European journal of surgery = Acta chirurgica.

[25]  A. J. Campbell,et al.  Declines in physical functioning attributable to hip fracture among older people: a follow-up study of case-control participants. , 2000, Disability and rehabilitation.

[26]  Christianna S. Williams,et al.  Home-based multicomponent rehabilitation program for older persons after hip fracture: a randomized trial. , 1999, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[27]  H. Iwata,et al.  Functional outcome after hip fracture in Japan. , 1998, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[28]  J. Zuckerman,et al.  Predictors of functional recovery after hip fracture in the elderly. , 1998, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[29]  J. Zuckerman,et al.  Functional outcome after hip fracture. Effect of general versus regional anesthesia. , 1998, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[30]  D J Berry,et al.  Total Hip Arthroplasty for the Treatment of an Acute Fracture of the Femoral Neck. Long-term Results* , 1998, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[31]  R. Klineberg,et al.  Cohort study of risk of institutionalisation after hip fracture , 1996, Australian and New Zealand journal of public health.

[32]  C. Palmer,et al.  Prediction of rehabilitation after hip fracture. , 1995, Age and ageing.

[33]  M Weatherall,et al.  One year follow up of patients with fracture of the proximal femur. , 1994, The New Zealand medical journal.

[34]  R. Craik Disability following hip fracture. , 1994, Physical therapy.

[35]  M. Parker,et al.  Mortality and morbidity after hip fractures. , 1993, BMJ.

[36]  L. Borgquist,et al.  Outcome after hip fracture in different health care districts. Rehabilitation of 837 consecutive patients in primary care 1986-88. , 1991, Scandinavian journal of primary health care.

[37]  R. Craik,et al.  The effects of persistent depressive symptoms on hip fracture recovery. , 1990, Journal of gerontology.

[38]  C. Winograd,et al.  Impact of prospective payment and discharge location on the outcome of hip fracture , 1989, Journal of General Internal Medicine.

[39]  R. Craik,et al.  Determinants of recovery 12 months after hip fracture: the importance of psychosocial factors. , 1989, American journal of public health.

[40]  M. Möller,et al.  Walking ability and activity level after hip fracture in the elderly--a follow-up. , 2003, Journal of rehabilitation medicine.

[41]  C. Mackenzie,et al.  Measuring Recovery after a Hip Fracture Using the SF-36 and Cummings Scales , 2002, Osteoporosis International.

[42]  R. Sulkava,et al.  Significant changes in the surgical methods and length of hospital stay of hip fracture patients occurring over 10 years in Central Finland. , 1999, Annales chirurgiae et gynaecologiae.

[43]  R. Jerre,et al.  Long-term results after nailing in situ of slipped upper femoral epiphysis: A 30-year follow-up of 59 hips , 1998 .

[44]  J. Murray,et al.  The Global Burden of Disease , 1996 .

[45]  T. Dolk Influence of treatment factors on the outcome after hip fractures. , 1989, Upsala journal of medical sciences.