Second language acquisition across modalities: Production variability in adult L2 learners of American Sign Language

A study was conducted to examine production variability in American Sign Language (ASL) in order to gain insight into the development of motor control in a language produced in another modality. Production variability was characterized through the spatiotemporal index (STI), which represents production stability in whole utterances and is a function of variability in effector displacement waveforms (Smith et al., 1995). Motion capture apparatus was used to acquire wrist displacement data across a set of eight target signs embedded in carrier phrases. The STI values of Deaf signers and hearing learners at three different ASL experience levels were compared to determine whether production stability varied as a function of time spent acquiring ASL. We hypothesized that lower production stability as indexed by the STI would be evident for beginning ASL learners, indicating greater production variability, with variability decreasing as ASL language experience increased. As predicted, Deaf signers showed significantly lower STI values than the hearing learners, suggesting that stability of production is indeed characteristic of increased ASL use. The linear trend across experience levels of hearing learners was not statistically significant in all spatial dimensions, indicating that improvement in production stability across relatively short time scales was weak. This novel approach to characterizing production stability in ASL utterances has relevance for the identification of sign production disorders and for assessing L2 acquisition of sign languages.

[1]  Christian Rathmann,et al.  Proximalization and Distalization of Sign Movement in Adult Learners , 2000 .

[2]  Russel S. Rosen Beginning L2 production errors in ASL lexical phonology: A cognitive phonology model , 2004 .

[3]  Wendy Sandler,et al.  Sign Language and Linguistic Universals: Entering the lexicon: lexicalization, backformation, and cross-modal borrowing , 2006 .

[4]  E. Klima The signs of language , 1979 .

[5]  Brenda M. Montgomery,et al.  The prevalence of stuttering in the hearing-impaired school age population. , 1988, Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders.

[6]  Howard N. Zelaznik,et al.  Spatiotemporal stability and patterning of speech movement sequences , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[7]  Ceil Lucas,et al.  The Sociolinguistics of Sign Languages , 2001 .

[8]  Nancy J. Frishberg ARBITRARINESS AND ICONICITY: HISTORICAL CHANGE IN AMERICAN SIGN LANGUAGE , 1975 .

[9]  Anne Smith,et al.  Stability and patterning of speech movement sequences in children and adults. , 1998, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[10]  Anne Smith,et al.  Influences of sentence length and syntactic complexity on the speech motor control of children who stutter. , 2013, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[11]  Geoffrey Whitebread,et al.  6. A Review of Stuttering in Signed Languages , 2014 .

[12]  J. van Borsel,et al.  Stutter-like dysfluencies in Flemish Sign Language users , 2009, Clinical linguistics & phonetics.

[13]  A Smith,et al.  Influences of utterance length and complexity on speech motor performance in children and adults. , 2000, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[14]  L. Petitto,et al.  Babbling in the manual mode: evidence for the ontogeny of language. , 1991, Science.

[15]  H. Månsson Childhood stuttering: Incidence and development , 2000 .

[16]  E. Newport,et al.  Out of the hands of babes: On a possible sign advantage in language acquisition , 1990 .

[17]  A. Smith,et al.  Influences of length and syntactic complexity on the speech motor stability of the fluent speech of adults who stutter. , 2000, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[18]  Lisa Goffman,et al.  Physiological indices of bilingualism: oral-motor coordination and speech rate in Bengali-English speakers. , 2008, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[19]  Karen Emmorey,et al.  The influence of visual feedback and register changes on sign language production: A kinematic study with deaf signers. , 2009, Applied psycholinguistics.

[20]  Neeraja Sadagopan,et al.  Developmental changes in the effects of utterance length and complexity on speech movement variability. , 2008, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[21]  Christian Rathmann Event structure in American Sign Language , 2005 .

[22]  Emma Brunskill,et al.  Global and regional hearing impairment prevalence: an analysis of 42 studies in 29 countries. , 2013, European journal of public health.

[23]  O. Bloodstein A handbook on stuttering , 1969 .

[24]  Elissa L. Newport,et al.  The acquisition of American Sign Language. , 1985 .

[25]  J. Y. Malone,et al.  The Relationship of Hearing Acuity to Stammering , 1939 .

[26]  D. Slobin,et al.  The Crosslinguistic Study of Language Acquisition , 2000 .

[27]  Marina L. McIntire The Acquisition of American Sign Language Hand Configurations , 2013 .

[28]  Ceil Lucas,et al.  The Sociolinguistics of Sign Languages: Frontmatter , 2001 .

[29]  O. Backus XLVIII Incidence of Stuttering among the Deaf , 1938 .

[30]  A. Smith,et al.  Kinematic correlates of speaking rate changes in stuttering and normally fluent adults. , 2000, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.