The accuracy of measurements of three-dimensional computed tomography reconstructions.

PURPOSE The purpose of this study was to evaluate the accuracy and reproducibility of linear measurements obtained from three-dimensional reconstructions of computed tomography (CT) scans. MATERIALS AND METHODS Ten rectangular acrylic blocks were prepared with titanium molybdenum alloy (TMA) markers spaced from 1 to 10 mm, respectively. A plastic sphere was prepared with 10 sets of TMA markers spaced at variable intervals of 1 to 10 mm. Each object was scanned three times at 3-mm slice thicknesses and 1.5 mm with 0.5 mm overlap slice thicknesses, as well as positioned in the CT scanner in two different directions (perpendicular and parallel) to the scanning beam. Intermarker distances of the reconstructed objects were then measured using the measurement tool of the MediCAD software and compared with measurements taken by hand with a vernier caliper. RESULTS Using the 3-mm cut protocol, the data indicated that inconsistency exists between intermarker distance in the scans when the rectangular objects were scanned parallel to the scanning beam. This finding was not seen using the 1.5-mm with 0.5-mm overlap slice thickness protocol. The intermarker distances for objects scanned perpendicular to the scanning beam were consistent but subject to demagnification in the range of 17% to 20% for both scanning protocols. CONCLUSION The orientation of the object to the scanning beam and slice thickness protocol appear to have an impact on the accuracy and variability of linear measurements taken in the x, y, z axes.

[1]  D. Hemmy,et al.  CT of dry skulls with craniofacial deformities: accuracy of three-dimensional reconstruction. , 1985, Radiology.

[2]  M. Yamashiro,et al.  Computed tomography for the diagnosis of facial fractures. , 1981, Journal of oral surgery.

[3]  J. Posnick,et al.  Sagittal synostosis: quantitative assessment of presenting deformity and surgical results based on CT scans. , 1993, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[4]  E. A. Stevens,et al.  Computerized tomography in oral and maxillofacial surgery. , 1980, Journal of oral surgery.

[5]  S. Eisig,et al.  Effects of rigid fixation device composition on three-dimensional computed axial tomography imaging: direct measurements on a pig model. , 1994, Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery : official journal of the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons.

[6]  M W Vannier,et al.  Three dimensional CT reconstruction images for craniofacial surgical planning and evaluation. , 1984, Radiology.

[7]  J. Hunter,et al.  Evaluation of craniosynostosis with three-dimensional CT imaging. , 1989, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[8]  J. C. Ohman,et al.  Estimation of maxillary alveolar cleft volume by three-dimensional CT. , 1990, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[9]  E V Staab,et al.  A method for three-dimensional image reformation for quantitative cephalometric analysis. , 1989, Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery : official journal of the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons.

[10]  P. Dean,et al.  Detectability of spherical objects by computed tomography. , 1979, Radiology.

[11]  S S Sagel,et al.  Computed tomography of the thorax. , 1978, Radiology.

[12]  J. Posnick,et al.  Crouzon syndrome: quantitative assessment of presenting deformity and surgical results based on CT scans. , 1993, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[13]  D Magid,et al.  Three-dimensional volumetric display of CT data: effect of scan parameters upon image quality. , 1991, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[14]  J. Posnick,et al.  Craniofacial Skeletal Measurements Based on Computed Tomography: Part I. Accuracy and Reproducibility , 1992 .

[15]  N J Pelc,et al.  Nonlinear partial volume artifacts in x-ray computed tomography. , 1980, Medical physics.

[16]  G T Herman,et al.  Three-dimensional computed tomography in maxillofacial trauma. , 1986, Archives of otolaryngology--head & neck surgery.