Services provided for axial spondyloarthritis patients by rheumatologists in India: a survey

Abstract Objective We sought to evaluate the current knowledge and attitudes of Indian rheumatologists concerning axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) with respect to recent terminology for diagnosis, management strategies and additional services. Methods The survey was designed for spondyloarthritis care given by rheumatologists in the Indian health-care context. The structured survey consisted of a combination of multiple-choice and open-ended questions. An anonymous Web-based questionnaire was sent to 710 members of the Indian Rheumatology Association, and descriptive analysis of responses was done. Results The survey respondents were from government and private health-care facilities and gave a response rate of 19% (133 of 710). About 49% of respondents were using the terminology axSpA for a new diagnosis of spondyloarthritis (SpA). BASDAI was used routinely as the main disease monitoring tool by most respondents (76.2%). Same-day MRI was available to 42.9% (51 of 119) respondents. Selective cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitors were the preferred first NSAID for 50% of respondents, and SSZ was the most preferred DMARD for peripheral arthritis. Financial constraints were the most common factor that affected the initiation of biologics and also the most common reason for stopping biological therapies. Nearly 65% (80 of 122) of respondents did not have a multidisciplinary team available in clinical practice, and only 15% of respondents had access to patient support groups. Conclusion For a new diagnosis, the terminology of axSpA is not fully accepted by Indian rheumatologists. The axSpA management given by Indian rheumatologists is in agreement with recent guidelines, however, there is a significant lack of accessibility to multidisciplinary care and patient support groups in India.

[1]  V. Ravindran,et al.  Therapeutic exercises and rehabilitation in axial spondyloarthropathy: Balancing benefits with unique challenges in the Asia‐Pacific countries , 2020, International journal of rheumatic diseases.

[2]  X. Michelena,et al.  Non-radiographic versus radiographic axSpA: what’s in a name? , 2020, Rheumatology.

[3]  Dongseok Choi,et al.  Assessing rheumatologists’ attitudes and utilization of classification criteria for ankylosing spondylitis and axial spondyloarthritis: a global effort , 2020, Clinical Rheumatology.

[4]  A. Wakhlu,et al.  Rheumatology practice and training in India – A perspective from rheumatology consultants , 2020 .

[5]  M. Ward,et al.  2019 Update of the American College of Rheumatology/Spondylitis Association of America/Spondyloarthritis Research and Treatment Network Recommendations for the Treatment of Ankylosing Spondylitis and Nonradiographic Axial Spondyloarthritis , 2019, Arthritis care & research.

[6]  D. Furst,et al.  Targeting inflammatory pathways in axial spondyloarthritis , 2019, Arthritis Research & Therapy.

[7]  M. Jena,et al.  Biosimilars in India; Current Status and Future Perspectives , 2019, Journal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences.

[8]  V. Shobha,et al.  Prescribing patterns and safety of biologics in immune-mediated rheumatic diseases: Karnataka biologics cohort study group experience , 2019, Indian Journal of Rheumatology.

[9]  J. Greenberg,et al.  Characterization of Patients With Ankylosing Spondylitis and Nonradiographic Axial Spondyloarthritis in the US‐Based Corrona Registry , 2018, Arthritis care & research.

[10]  S. Swaminathan,et al.  National Ethical Guidelines for Biomedical and Health Research Involving Human Participants, 2017: A commentary. , 2018, Indian journal of medical ethics.

[11]  S. Siebert,et al.  Services for spondyloarthritis: a survey of patients and rheumatologists , 2018, Rheumatology.

[12]  Sakir Ahmed,et al.  Poor quality of life in indian ankylosing spondylitis patients , 2018 .

[13]  F. Berenbaum,et al.  Poor efficacy of TNF inhibitors in non-radiographic axial spondyloarthritis in the absence of objective signs: A bicentric retrospective study. , 2017, Joint, bone, spine : revue du rhumatisme.

[14]  T. Lancet Health in India, 2017 , 2017, The Lancet.

[15]  The Lancet Health in India, 2017. , 2017 .

[16]  S. Seo,et al.  Research Methods in Healthcare Epidemiology: Survey and Qualitative Research , 2016, Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology.

[17]  A. Rathore Biosimilars in India. , 2015, Journal of proteomics.

[18]  S. Gogia,et al.  Comparison of patients with ankylosing spondylitis (AS) and non‐radiographic axial spondyloarthritis (nr‐axSpA) from a single rheumatology clinic in New Delhi , 2015, International journal of rheumatic diseases.

[19]  D. M. van der Heijde,et al.  Optimisation of rheumatology assessments - the actual situation in axial spondyloarthritis including ankylosing spondylitis. , 2014, Clinical and experimental rheumatology.

[20]  S. Masiero,et al.  Supervised training and home-based rehabilitation in patients with stabilized ankylosing spondylitis on TNF inhibitor treatment: a controlled clinical trial with a 12-month follow-up , 2014, Clinical rehabilitation.

[21]  M. Dougados,et al.  The development of Assessment of SpondyloArthritis international Society classification criteria for axial spondyloarthritis (part II): validation and final selection , 2009, Annals of the rheumatic diseases.

[22]  A. Malaviya,et al.  Diagnosis delay in patients with ankylosing spondylitis: factors and outcomes—an Indian perspective , 2009, Clinical Rheumatology.