Estimation of the damage of a porous limestone using continuous wave velocity measurements during uniaxial creep tests

Abstract The damage of an oolitic limestone during quasi-instantaneous compressive tests and multi-step creep tests was studied using an experimental device which enabled the simultaneous and continuous measurement of strains and elastic wave velocities under mechanical loading and controlled hydrous conditions. The simultaneous measurements of five elastic wave velocities (3 P -waves and 2 S -waves) in different directions of propagation and polarisation allowed us to assess the acoustic tensor at any time during loading and thus continuously monitor the evolution of rock damage. The general trend observed in the experimental results was the strong influence of hydrous conditions on both the quasi-instantaneous and time dependent behaviour of this rock. As traditionally observed in the quasi-instantaneous behaviour of quasi-brittle rocks under deviatoric loading, typical anisotropic straining was observed, confirmed by the anisotropy of the wave velocity measured in axial and lateral directions. However, after full unloading, even if a decrease in all waves’s velocities and dynamic elastic moduli was observed, the quasi-isotropy of waves’s velocities was recovered. This recovery after unloading cycle was observed until stress levels close to the peak (i.e., failure) stress. A comparison of laboratory results with numerical predictions from micromechanical models showed that these observations could not be explained by traditional crack propagation theories and that other mechanisms of crack growth must therefore be considered. These trends were also observed during the loading/unloading stages between each creep step with one notable difference, namely that the anisotropy developed during the creep stage was not recovered during the full unloading. A combination of crack growth and crack nucleation combined with a mechanism of progressive crack sliding and closure seems to explain these unusual results. The nucleation of cracks is mostly related to fast loading while the crack propagation is mostly due to subcritical growth of favourable oriented cracks.

[1]  V. Renaud,et al.  Computations of effective moduli for microcracked materials: a boundary element approach , 1996 .

[2]  Acoustic velocity changes during shear enhanced compaction of sandstone , 1993 .

[3]  Mark Kachanov,et al.  Microcrack‐induced elastic wave anisotropy of brittle rocks , 1995 .

[4]  R. Kranz,et al.  CRACK GROWTH AND DEVELOPMENT DURING CREEP OF BARRE GRANITE , 1979 .

[5]  M. Berveiller,et al.  A new class of micro–macro models for elastic–viscoplastic heterogeneous materials , 2002 .

[6]  D. Faulkner,et al.  Quantifying the evolution of static elastic properties as crystalline rock approaches failure , 2008 .

[7]  M. Kachanov,et al.  A microcrack model of rock inelasticity part II: Propagation of microcracks , 1982 .

[8]  Kate Hadley,et al.  Comparison of calculated and observed crack densities and seismic velocities in westerly granite , 1976 .

[9]  Yves Guéguen,et al.  Elastic wave velocities and permeability evolution during compaction of Bleurswiller sandstone , 2005 .

[10]  D. Dewhurst,et al.  Experimental and theoretical rock physics research with application to reservoirs, seals and fluid processes , 2007 .

[11]  L. Kachanov,et al.  Rupture Time Under Creep Conditions , 1999 .

[12]  C. Sayers.  Stress‐dependent seismic anisotropy of shales , 1999 .

[13]  Z. T. Bieniawski,et al.  Mechanism of brittle fracture of rockPart Itheory of the fracture process , 1967 .

[14]  Sia Nemat-Nasser,et al.  Overall moduli of solids with microcracks: Load-induced anisotropy , 1983 .

[15]  Dragan Grgic,et al.  Estimation of the damage of a porous limestone from continuous (P- and S-) wave velocity measurements under uniaxial loading and different hydrous conditions , 2010 .

[16]  Marie-Noëlle Pons,et al.  Geometric analysis of damaged microcracking in granites , 2000 .

[17]  D. Hoxha,et al.  Modelling long-term behaviour of a natural gypsum rock , 2005 .

[18]  Françoise Homand,et al.  Microstructural approach in damage modeling , 2000 .

[19]  J. Shao,et al.  A unified elastic–plastic and viscoplastic damage model for quasi-brittle rocks , 2008 .

[20]  A. L. Florence,et al.  An experimental method to study the dynamic tensile failure of brittle geologic materials , 1987 .

[21]  N. Cristescu.  New Trends in Rock Mechanics , 2002 .

[22]  P. Meredith,et al.  Damage accumulation during triaxial creep of darley dale sandstone from pore volumometry and acoustic emission , 1997 .

[23]  M. Paterson.  Experimental Rock Deformation: The Brittle Field , 1978 .

[24]  W. Blum.  Creep of crystalline materials: experimental basis, mechanisms and models , 2001 .

[25]  Laurent Molez,et al.  Shale dynamic properties and anisotropy under triaxial loading: experimental and theoretical investigations , 2007 .

[26]  N. A. Chandler,et al.  The progressive fracture of Lac du Bonnet granite , 1994 .

[27]  S. Vinciguerra,et al.  The evolution of elastic moduli with increasing crack damage during cyclic stressing of a basalt from Mt. Etna volcano , 2009 .

[28]  E. Z. Lajtai,et al.  The effect of water on the time-dependent deformation and fracture of a granite , 1987 .

[29]  Colin M. Sayers,et al.  Stress-induced ultrasonic anisotrophy in Berea sandstone , 1990 .

[30]  Paul Tapponnier,et al.  Development of stress-induced microcracks in Westerly Granite , 1976 .

[31]  Teng-fong Wong,et al.  Geometric probability approach to the characterization and analysis of microcracking in rocks , 1985 .

[32]  Sia Nemat-Nasser,et al.  A Microcrack Model of Dilatancy in Brittle Materials , 1988 .

[33]  H. B. Li,et al.  Triaxial compression tests on a granite at different strain rates and confining pressures , 1999 .

[34]  J. Chaboche,et al.  Mechanics of Solid Materials , 1990 .

[35]  D. Amitrano,et al.  Creep of a porous rock and associated acoustic emission under different hydrous conditions , 2009 .

[36]  Yong-Hong Zhao,et al.  Crack pattern evolution and a fractal damage constitutive model for rock , 1998 .

[37]  D. Dewhurst,et al.  Impact of fabric, microcracks and stress field on shale anisotropy , 2006 .

[38]  C. Dascalu,et al.  A two-scale model for subcritical damage propagation , 2010 .

[39]  P. Horsrud,et al.  Stress dependent wave velocities in sedimentary rock cores: Why and why not? , 1997 .

[40]  Xia-Ting Feng,et al.  Modeling of anisotropic damage and creep deformation in brittle rocks , 2006 .

[41]  Joe L. Ratigan,et al.  Dilatancy of rock salt in laboratory tests , 1993 .

[42]  René de Borst,et al.  A comparison between the Perzyna viscoplastic model and the consistency viscoplastic model , 2002 .

[43]  Mark Kachanov,et al.  Elastic Solids with Many Cracks and Related Problems , 1993 .

[44]  Weidong Song,et al.  Fracture characteristics of concrete subjected to impact loading , 2010 .

[45]  Graham West.  Effect of suction on the strength of rock , 1994, Quarterly Journal of Engineering Geology.

[46]  L. Briottet.  Damage in a viscoplastic material—Part II. Overall behaviour , 1998 .

[47]  N. A. Chandler,et al.  Innovative laboratory testing , 2004 .

[48]  D. Hoxha,et al.  A microstructural study of natural and experimentally induced cracks in a granodiorite , 2005 .

[49]  J. Suvorova,et al.  An approach to the description of time-dependent materials , 2003 .

[50]  R. Kranz.  Microcracks in rocks: a review , 1983 .