Minimally invasive extracorporeal circulation: excellent outcome and life expectancy after coronary artery bypass grafting surgery.
暂无分享,去创建一个
T. Carrel | A. Kadner | C. Huber | G. Zuk | B. Gahl | B. Winkler | P. Heinisch | K. Żuk | Hansjoerg Jenni | Katarzyna Żuk
[1] A. Kleontas,et al. Minimally invasive extracorporeal circulation improves quality of life after coronary artery bypass grafting. , 2016, European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery.
[2] T. Kieser,et al. Comparison of logistic EuroSCORE and EuroSCORE II in predicting operative mortality of 1125 total arterial operations. , 2016, European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery.
[3] T. Carrel,et al. Graft preservation solutions in cardiovascular surgery. , 2016, Interactive cardiovascular and thoracic surgery.
[4] B. Eberle,et al. Cerebral Microembolization During Aortic Valve Replacement Using Minimally Invasive or Conventional Extracorporeal Circulation: A Randomized Trial. , 2016, Artificial organs.
[5] J. Schaarschmidt,et al. Use of minimal invasive extracorporeal circulation in cardiac surgery: principles, definitions and potential benefits. A position paper from the Minimal invasive Extra-Corporeal Technologies international Society (MiECTiS). , 2016, Interactive cardiovascular and thoracic surgery.
[6] D. Taggart,et al. Safety and efficacy of miniaturized extracorporeal circulation when compared with off-pump and conventional coronary artery bypass grafting: evidence synthesis from a comprehensive Bayesian-framework network meta-analysis of 134 randomized controlled trials involving 22 778 patients. , 2016, European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery.
[7] J. Murkin,et al. Minimally Invasive Extracorporeal Circulation (MiECC): Towards a More Physiologic Perfusion. , 2016, Journal of cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesia.
[8] M. Mack,et al. TCT-164 Causes of Death after Percutaneous Coronary Intervention versus Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting in Complex Coronary Artery Disease: 5-Year follow-up of the SYNTAX trial , 2015 .
[9] J. Schaarschmidt,et al. A retrospective comparative study of minimally invasive extracorporeal circulation versus conventional extracorporeal circulation in emergency coronary artery bypass surgery patients: a single surgeon analysis. , 2015, Interactive cardiovascular and thoracic surgery.
[10] A. Haneya,et al. Impact of age on early outcome after coronary bypass graft surgery using minimized versus conventional extracorporeal circulation , 2014, Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery.
[11] P. Serruys,et al. Cost-Effectiveness of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention With Drug-Eluting Stents Versus Bypass Surgery for Patients With 3-Vessel or Left Main Coronary Artery Disease: Final Results From the Synergy Between Percutaneous Coronary Intervention With TAXUS and Cardiac Surgery (SYNTAX) Trial , 2014, Circulation.
[12] L. Aarts,et al. Minimised closed circuit coronary artery bypass grafting in the elderly is associated with lower levels of organ-specific biomarkers: A prospective randomised study , 2013, European journal of anaesthesiology.
[13] N. Maniadakis,et al. Coronary artery bypass grafting with minimal versus conventional extracorporeal circulation; an economic analysis. , 2013, International journal of cardiology.
[14] C. Asteriou,et al. Enhanced recovery after elective coronary revascularization surgery with minimal versus conventional extracorporeal circulation: a prospective randomized study. , 2013, Journal of cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesia.
[15] I. Rodrigus,et al. Cardioplexol, a new cardioplegic solution for elective CABG , 2013, Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery.
[16] J. Roujeau,et al. Impact of STROBE Statement Publication on Quality of Observational Study Reporting: Interrupted Time Series versus Before-After Analysis , 2013, PloS one.
[17] A. Haidich,et al. Use of minimal extracorporeal circulation improves outcome after heart surgery; a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. , 2013, International journal of cardiology.
[18] B. Vollmar,et al. Comparing microvascular alterations during minimal extracorporeal circulation and conventional cardiopulmonary bypass in coronary artery bypass graft surgery: a prospective, randomized study. , 2012, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.
[19] M. Czerny,et al. Autotransfusion system or integrated automatic suction device in minimized extracorporeal circulation: influence on coagulation and inflammatory response. , 2011, European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery.
[20] A. Haneya,et al. Minimized extracorporeal circulation system in coronary artery bypass surgery: a 10-year single-center experience with 2243 patients. , 2011, European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery.
[21] M. Kosmidis,et al. Neurocognitive outcome after coronary artery bypass surgery using minimal versus conventional extracorporeal circulation: a randomised controlled pilot study , 2011, Heart.
[22] C. Asteriou,et al. Haematological effects of minimized compared to conventional extracorporeal circulation after coronary revascularization procedures , 2010, Perfusion.
[23] G. Biondi-Zoccai,et al. Miniaturized cardiopulmonary bypass improves short-term outcome in cardiac surgery: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled studies. , 2010, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.
[24] H. Hausmann,et al. Evaluation of hemodynamic and regional tissue perfusion effects of minimized extracorporeal circulation (MECC). , 2010, The journal of extra-corporeal technology.
[25] F. Biancari,et al. Miniaturized versus conventional cardiopulmonary bypass in high-risk patients undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery , 2010, Perfusion.
[26] F. Biancari,et al. Meta-analysis of randomised trials comparing the effectiveness of miniaturised versus conventional cardiopulmonary bypass in adult cardiac surgery , 2009, Heart.
[27] L. Aarts,et al. Myocardial oxidative stress, and cell injury comparing three different techniques for coronary artery bypass grafting. , 2008, European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery.
[28] T. Carrel,et al. Minimal extracorporeal circulation is a promising technique for coronary artery bypass grafting. , 2007, The Annals of thoracic surgery.
[29] Yasuhiko Kobayashi,et al. Minimal cardiopulmonary bypass attenuates neutrophil activation and cytokine release in coronary artery bypass grafting , 2007, Journal of Artificial Organs.
[30] G. Rakhorst,et al. Attenuated renal and intestinal injury after use of a mini-cardiopulmonary bypass system. , 2007, The Annals of thoracic surgery.
[31] D. Zurakowski,et al. Effect of closed minimized cardiopulmonary bypass on cerebral tissue oxygenation and microembolization. , 2006, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.
[32] S. Nashef,et al. The logistic EuroSCORE , 2003 .
[33] R. Salamon,et al. Risk factors and outcome in European cardiac surgery: analysis of the EuroSCORE multinational database of 19030 patients. , 1999, European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery.
[34] T. Carrel,et al. Minimally Invasive Extracorporeal Circulation Circuit Is Not Inferior to Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting: Meta-Analysis Using the Bayesian Method. , 2017, The Annals of thoracic surgery.