Objective psychomotor skills assessment of experienced and novice flexible endoscopists with a virtual reality simulator.

The objective of this study was to determine whether the GI Mentor II virtual reality simulator can distinguish the psychomotor skills of intermediately experienced endoscopists from those of novices, and do so with a high level of consistency and reliability. A total of five intermediate and nine novice endoscopists were evaluated using the EndoBubble abstract psychomotor task. Each subject performed three repetitions of the task. Performance and error data were recorded for each trial. The intermediate group performed better than the novice group in each trial. The differences were significant in trial 1 for balloons popped (P = .001), completion time (P = .04), and errors (P = .03). Trial 2 showed significance only for balloons popped (P = .002). Trial 3 showed significance for balloons popped (P = .004) and errors (P = .008). The novice group showed significant improvement between trials 1 and 3 (P < 0.05). No improvement was noted in the intermediate group. Measures of consistency and reliability were greater than 0.8 in both groups with the exception of novice completion time where test-retest reliability was 0.74. The GI Mentor II simulator can distinguish between novice and intermediate endoscopists. The simulator assesses skills with levels of consistency and reliability required for high-stakes assessment.

[1]  Dennis M. Jensen,et al.  Principles of training in gastrointestinal endoscopy , 1999 .

[2]  A. Gallagher,et al.  Objective Psychomotor Skills Assessment of Experienced, Junior, and Novice Laparoscopists with Virtual Reality , 2001, World Journal of Surgery.

[3]  D A Asch,et al.  The Libby Zion case. One step forward or two steps backward? , 1988, The New England journal of medicine.

[4]  J. Marshall,et al.  Technical proficiency of trainees performing colonoscopy: a learning curve. , 1995, Gastrointestinal endoscopy.

[5]  R. Satava,et al.  Virtual reality as a metric for the assessment of laparoscopic psychomotor skills , 2002, Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques.

[6]  A. Gallagher,et al.  An ergonomic analysis of the fulcrum effect in the acquisition of endoscopic skills. , 1998, Endoscopy.

[7]  R. Schoefl,et al.  Evaluation of a virtual endoscopy simulator for training in gastrointestinal endoscopy. , 2002, Endoscopy.

[8]  R. Satava,et al.  Virtual Reality Training Improves Operating Room Performance: Results of a Randomized, Double-Blinded Study , 2002, Annals of surgery.

[9]  O W Cass,et al.  Training to Competence in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy: A Plea for Continuous Measuring of Objective End Points , 1999, Endoscopy.

[10]  Williams Cb,et al.  Development of colonoscopy teaching simulation. , 2000 .

[11]  B R Parry,et al.  Competency and the colonoscopist: a learning curve. , 1991, The Australian and New Zealand journal of surgery.

[12]  S. Raptis,et al.  Acquisition of Competence in Colonoscopy: The Learning Curve of Trainees , 1999, Endoscopy.

[13]  S Bar-Meir,et al.  A New Endoscopic Simulator , 2000, Endoscopy.

[14]  C. Peine,et al.  Objective Evaluation of Endoscopy Skills during Training , 1993, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[15]  L. Kohn,et al.  To Err Is Human : Building a Safer Health System , 2007 .