A Study of Analysis Parameters That Influence the Sensitivity of Event-Related fMRI Analyses

To assess the effect of various analysis parameters on the sensitivity of event-related fMRI analyses, 36 analyses were performed on a single fMRI data-set, varying parameters along four axes: (1) resampled voxel size; (2) spatial smoothing; (3) temporal smoothing; and (4) the set of basis functions used to model event-related responses. Sensitivity (i.e., the probability of detecting an activation given it exists) was assessed in terms of Z scores and by a metric for corrected P values, the negative log of the expected Euler characteristic. Sixteen brain regions distributed across cortical and subcortical areas were included in the meta-analysis. Main effects on sensitivity were found for resampled voxel size, spatial smoothing, temporal smoothing, and the set of basis functions chosen. The analysis parameters that generally produced the most sensitive analyses were a 2-mm(3) resampled voxel size, 10-mm spatial smoothing, 4-s temporal smoothing, and a basis set comprising a hemodynamic response function and its temporal derivative.

[1]  J. Rajapakse,et al.  Human Brain Mapping 6:283–300(1998) � Modeling Hemodynamic Response for Analysis of Functional MRI Time-Series , 2022 .

[2]  N A Thacker,et al.  The effects of motion on parametric fMRI analysis techniques , 1999, Physiological measurement.

[3]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Brain Systems Mediating Aversive Conditioning: an Event-Related fMRI Study , 1998, Neuron.

[4]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Event‐related f MRI , 1997, Human brain mapping.

[5]  M. D’Esposito,et al.  The Variability of Human, BOLD Hemodynamic Responses , 1998, NeuroImage.

[6]  R. Weisskoff,et al.  Effect of temporal autocorrelation due to physiological noise and stimulus paradigm on voxel‐level false‐positive rates in fMRI , 1998, Human brain mapping.

[7]  R. Adler,et al.  The Geometry of Random Fields , 1982 .

[8]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Analysis of fMRI Time-Series Revisited , 1995, NeuroImage.

[9]  John C. Gore,et al.  ROC Analysis of Statistical Methods Used in Functional MRI: Individual Subjects , 1999, NeuroImage.

[10]  K. Worsley,et al.  Local Maxima and the Expected Euler Characteristic of Excursion Sets of χ 2, F and t Fields , 1994, Advances in Applied Probability.

[11]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Nonlinear event‐related responses in fMRI , 1998, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[12]  M. D’Esposito,et al.  Empirical Analyses of BOLD fMRI Statistics , 1997, NeuroImage.

[13]  M. D’Esposito,et al.  Empirical Analyses of BOLD fMRI Statistics , 1997, NeuroImage.

[14]  M. D’Esposito,et al.  Empirical analyses of BOLD fMRI statistics. I. Spatially unsmoothed data collected under null-hypothesis conditions. , 1997, NeuroImage.

[15]  M. D’Esposito,et al.  The variability of human BOLD hemodynamic responses , 1998, NeuroImage.

[16]  E Zarahn,et al.  Empirical analyses of BOLD fMRI statistics. II. Spatially smoothed data collected under null-hypothesis and experimental conditions. , 1997, NeuroImage.

[17]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Analysis of fMRI Time-Series Revisited—Again , 1995, NeuroImage.

[18]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Event‐related f MRI , 1997, Human brain mapping.