Contribution of frequency modulation to speech recognition in noise.
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] Bruce J Gantz,et al. Speech recognition in noise for cochlear implant listeners: benefits of residual acoustic hearing. , 2004, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[2] Fan-Gang Zeng,et al. Cochlear implant speech recognition with speech maskers. , 2004, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[3] Fan-Gang Zeng,et al. Speech and melody recognition in binaurally combined acoustic and electric hearing. , 2005, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[4] P F Assmann. The role of formant transitions in the perception of concurrent vowels. , 1995, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[5] Hideki Kawahara,et al. Restructuring speech representations using a pitch-adaptive time-frequency smoothing and an instantaneous-frequency-based F0 extraction: Possible role of a repetitive structure in sounds , 1999, Speech Commun..
[6] Fan-Gang Zeng,et al. Speech recognition with amplitude and frequency modulations. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[7] Zachary M. Smith,et al. Chimaeric sounds reveal dichotomies in auditory perception , 2002, Nature.
[8] Stuart Rosen,et al. Enhancing temporal cues to voice pitch in continuous interleaved sampling cochlear implants. , 2004, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[9] IEEE Recommended Practice for Speech Quality Measurements , 1969, IEEE Transactions on Audio and Electroacoustics.
[10] Shangkai Gao,et al. A novel speech-processing strategy incorporating tonal information for cochlear implants , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.
[11] Michael K. Qin,et al. Effects of simulated cochlear-implant processing on speech reception in fluctuating maskers. , 2003, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[12] Peggy B Nelson,et al. Understanding speech in modulated interference: cochlear implant users and normal-hearing listeners. , 2003, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[13] R. W. Hukin,et al. Effectiveness of spatial cues, prosody, and talker characteristics in selective attention. , 2000, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[14] G. Stickney,et al. On the dichotomy in auditory perception between temporal envelope and fine structure cues. , 2004, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[15] Fan-Gang Zeng,et al. Encoding frequency Modulation to improve cochlear implant performance in noise , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.
[16] Fan-Gang Zeng,et al. Frequency modulation detection in cochlear implant subjects. , 2004, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[17] M F Dorman,et al. The recognition of sentences in noise by normal-hearing listeners using simulations of cochlear-implant signal processors with 6-20 channels. , 1998, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[18] R. Shannon,et al. Speech recognition in noise as a function of the number of spectral channels: comparison of acoustic hearing and cochlear implants. , 2001, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[19] R V Shannon,et al. Speech Recognition with Primarily Temporal Cues , 1995, Science.