Open Access Study Protocol a Prospective Randomised, Open-labeled, Trial Comparing Sirolimus-containing versus Mtor-inhibitor-free Immunosuppression in Patients Undergoing Liver Transplantation for Hepatocellular Carcinoma

article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Abstract Background: The potential anti-cancer effects of mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitors are being intensively studied. To date, however, few randomised clinical trials (RCT) have been performed to demonstrate anti-neoplastic effects in the pure oncology setting, and at present, no oncology endpoint-directed RCT has been reported in the high-malignancy risk population of immunosuppressed transplant recipients. Interestingly, since mTOR inhibitors have both immunosuppressive and anti-cancer effects, they have the potential to simultaneously protect against immunologic graft loss and tumour development. Therefore, we designed a prospective RCT to determine if the mTOR inhibitor sirolimus can improve hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC)-free patient survival in liver transplant (LT) recipients with a pre-transplant diagnosis of HCC. Methods/Design: The study is an open-labelled, randomised, RCT comparing sirolimus-containing versus mTOR-inhibitor-free immunosuppression in patients undergoing LT for HCC. Patients with a histologically confirmed HCC diagnosis are randomised into 2 groups within 4-6 weeks after LT; one arm is maintained on a centre-specific mTOR-inhibitor-free immunosuppressive protocol and the second arm is maintained on a centre-specific mTOR-inhibitor-free immunosuppressive protocol for the first 4-6 weeks, at which time sirolimus is initiated. A 2 1/2-year recruitment phase is planned with a 5-year follow-up, testing HCC-free survival as the primary endpoint. Our hypothesis is that sirolimus use in the second arm of the study will improve HCC-free survival. The study is a non-commercial investigator-initiated trial (IIT) sponsored by the University Hospital Regensburg and is endorsed by the European Liver and Intestine Transplant Association; 13 countries within Europe, Canada and Australia are participating. Discussion: If our hypothesis is correct that mTOR inhibition can reduce HCC tumour growth while simultaneously providing immunosuppression to protect the liver allograft from rejection, patients should experience less post-transplant problems with HCC recurrence, and therefore could expect a longer and better quality of life. A positive outcome will likely change the standard of posttransplant immunosuppressive care for LT patients with HCC. Background Patients with HCC that receive a LT in an attempt to cure their cancer and any superimposed liver disease face at least two major issues. First, the patient requires adequate immunosuppressive medication to avoid rejection of the liver allograft. Second, the patient has a risk that the HCC recurrence could recur, especially when in an immunosuppressed state. Even when …

[1]  P. Lamby,et al.  Procedures for ethical review for clinical trials within the EU , 2009, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[2]  O. Stoeltzing,et al.  Targeting heat‐shock protein 90 improves efficacy of rapamycin in a model of hepatocellular carcinoma in mice , 2009, Hepatology.

[3]  R. Motzer,et al.  Efficacy of everolimus in advanced renal cell carcinoma: a double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled phase III trial , 2008, The Lancet.

[4]  J. Trotter,et al.  Sirolimus‐based immunosuppression following liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma , 2008, Liver transplantation : official publication of the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases and the International Liver Transplantation Society.

[5]  David McDermott,et al.  Temsirolimus, interferon alfa, or both for advanced renal-cell carcinoma. , 2007, The New England journal of medicine.

[6]  A. M. Shapiro,et al.  De Novo Sirolimus-Based Immunosuppression After Liver Transplantation for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Long-Term Outcomes and Side Effects , 2007, Transplantation.

[7]  B. Kahan,et al.  Maintenance Immunosuppression with Target-of-Rapamycin Inhibitors is Associated with a Reduced Incidence of De Novo Malignancies , 2005, Transplantation.

[8]  A. M. Shapiro,et al.  Sirolimus‐based immunosuppression for liver transplantation in the presence of extended criteria for hepatocellular carcinoma , 2004, Liver transplantation : official publication of the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases and the International Liver Transplantation Society.

[9]  G. Koehl,et al.  RAPAMYCIN PROTECTS ALLOGRAFTS FROM REJECTION WHILE SIMULTANEOUSLY ATTACKING TUMORS IN IMMUNOSUPPRESSED MICE , 2004, Transplantation.

[10]  M. Bjornsti,et al.  The tor pathway: a target for cancer therapy , 2004, Nature Reviews Cancer.

[11]  H. Gerlach,et al.  Sirolimus inhibits growth of human hepatoma cells in contrast to tacrolimus which promotes cell growth. , 2002, Transplantation proceedings.

[12]  F. Luan,et al.  Rapamycin blocks tumor progression: unlinking immunosuppression from antitumor efficacy1 , 2002, Transplantation.

[13]  G. Koehl,et al.  Rapamycin inhibits primary and metastatic tumor growth by antiangiogenesis: involvement of vascular endothelial growth factor , 2002, Nature Medicine.

[14]  L. Ferrell,et al.  Effect of systemic cyclosporine on tumor recurrence after liver transplantation in a model of hepatocellular carcinoma. , 1999, Transplantation.

[15]  M. Lagman,et al.  Cyclosporine induces cancer progression by a cell-autonomous mechanism , 1999, Nature.

[16]  ndrea,et al.  Liver transplantation for the treatment of small hepatocellular carcinomas in patients with cirrhosis. , 1996, The New England journal of medicine.

[17]  G. Russ,et al.  Sirolimus therapy after early cyclosporine withdrawal reduces the risk for cancer in adult renal transplantation. , 2006, Journal of the American Society of Nephrology : JASN.

[18]  T. Weinstein,et al.  Effect of cyclosporin A on DNA repair and cancer incidence in kidney transplant recipients. , 2001, The Journal of laboratory and clinical medicine.

[19]  K. Tanikawa,et al.  Increased expression of vascular endothelial growth factor is associated with tumor progression in hepatocellular carcinoma. , 1998, Human pathology.

[20]  G. Murphy Cancer and transplantation , 1975 .