Connotations of pixel-based scale effect in remote sensing and the modified fractal-based analysis method

Scale problems are a major source of concern in the field of remote sensing. Since the remote sensing is a complex technology system, there is a lack of enough cognition on the connotation of scale and scale effect in remote sensing. Thus, this paper first introduces the connotations of pixel-based scale and summarizes the general understanding of pixel-based scale effect. Pixel-based scale effect analysis is essentially important for choosing the appropriate remote sensing data and the proper processing parameters. Fractal dimension is a useful measurement to analysis pixel-based scale. However in traditional fractal dimension calculation, the impact of spatial resolution is not considered, which leads that the scale effect change with spatial resolution can't be clearly reflected. Therefore, this paper proposes to use spatial resolution as the modified scale parameter of two fractal methods to further analyze the pixel-based scale effect. To verify the results of two modified methods (MFBM (Modified Windowed Fractal Brownian Motion Based on the Surface Area) and MDBM (Modified Windowed Double Blanket Method)); the existing scale effect analysis method (information entropy method) is used to evaluate. And six sub-regions of building areas and farmland areas were cut out from QuickBird images to be used as the experimental data. The results of the experiment show that both the fractal dimension and information entropy present the same trend with the decrease of spatial resolution, and some inflection points appear at the same feature scales. Further analysis shows that these feature scales (corresponding to the inflection points) are related to the actual sizes of the geo-object, which results in fewer mixed pixels in the image, and these inflection points are significantly indicative of the observed features. Therefore, the experiment results indicate that the modified fractal methods are effective to reflect the pixel-based scale effect existing in remote sensing data and it is helpful to analyze the observation scale from different aspects. This research will ultimately benefit for remote sensing data selection and application. The general understanding of pixel-based scale effect in remote sensing.Spatial resolution is used in FD to analyze the pixel-based scale effect.Using information entropy to evaluate the modified FD results.Feature scales on FD curves are related to the actual sizes of the geo-object.Ultimately benefit for remote sensing data selection and application.

[1]  Jianyu Yang,et al.  Modified ALV for selecting the optimal spatial resolution and its scale effect on image classification accuracy , 2011, Math. Comput. Model..

[2]  Changming Sun,et al.  A new method for linear feature and junction enhancement in 2D images based on morphological operation, oriented anisotropic Gaussian function and Hessian information , 2014, Pattern Recognit..

[3]  Jason W. Karl,et al.  Spatial dependence of predictions from image segmentation: A variogram-based method to determine appropriate scales for producing land-management information , 2010, Ecol. Informatics.

[4]  Pierre Dutilleul,et al.  Advances in the implementation of the box-counting method of fractal dimension estimation , 1999, Appl. Math. Comput..

[5]  C. Woodcock,et al.  Autocorrelation and regularization in digital images. II. Simple image models , 1989 .

[6]  C. Woodcock,et al.  Autocorrelation and regularization in digital images. I. Basic theory , 1988 .

[7]  Lalit Kumar,et al.  The ecology of scale , 2002 .

[8]  Marc F. P. Bierkens,et al.  Upscaling and downscaling methods for environmental research , 2000 .

[9]  Ling Bian,et al.  Object-Oriented Representation of Environmental Phenomena: Is Everything Best Represented as an Object? , 2007 .

[10]  Alex Pentland,et al.  Fractal-Based Description of Natural Scenes , 1984, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[11]  Thomas Blaschke,et al.  Object based image analysis for remote sensing , 2010 .

[12]  Wenxue Ju,et al.  An improved algorithm for computing local fractal dimension using the triangular prism method , 2009, Comput. Geosci..

[13]  Guiyun Zhou,et al.  A comparison of fractal dimension estimators based on multiple surface generation algorithms , 2005, Comput. Geosci..

[14]  F. Mahmoudi,et al.  Persian handwritten numeral recognition using Complex Neural Network and non-linear feature extraction , 2013, 2013 First Iranian Conference on Pattern Recognition and Image Analysis (PRIA).

[15]  Nina S. N. Lam,et al.  A comparison of local variance, fractal dimension, and Moran's I as aids to multispectral image classification , 2005 .

[16]  C. Woodcock,et al.  The factor of scale in remote sensing , 1987 .

[17]  Jun Qin,et al.  Multi-Level Spatial Analysis for Change Detection of Urban Vegetation at Individual Tree Scale , 2014, Remote. Sens..

[18]  L. Xiaobing,et al.  Research on urban spatial thermal environment using remotely sensed data: fractal measurement of structure and changes of thermal field , 2004, IGARSS 2004. 2004 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium.

[19]  Dongping Ming,et al.  Modified average local variance for pixel-level scale selection of multiband remote sensing images and its scale effect on image classification accuracy , 2013 .

[20]  Milan Stehlík,et al.  Fractal and stochastic geometry inference for breast cancer: a case study with random fractal models and Quermass‐interaction process , 2015, Statistics in medicine.

[21]  Harry Nyquist Certain Topics in Telegraph Transmission Theory , 1928 .

[22]  N. Lam,et al.  On the Issues of Scale, Resolution, and Fractal Analysis in the Mapping Sciences* , 1992 .

[23]  Jing Sun,et al.  Remote Sensing-Based Fractal Analysis and Scale Dependence Associated with Forest Fragmentation in an Amazon Tri-National Frontier , 2013, Remote. Sens..

[24]  Yang Jian-yu Spatial Scale of Remote Sensing Image and Selection of Optimal Spatial Resolution , 2008 .

[25]  Alan H. Strahler,et al.  On the nature of models in remote sensing , 1986 .

[26]  A. Cracknell Review article Synergy in remote sensing-what's in a pixel? , 1998 .