Accuracy of dynamic isometric force production: the influence of age and bimanual activation patters.

The purpose of this study was to investigate how children and adults control bimanual activities with the influence of kinematic variables minimized. Force and timing measures were analyzed in self-paced, isometric bimanual pinch tasks performed by 6-, 8-, 10-, 12-year-old, and adult subjects. Subjects (n = 84) performed four tasks (inphase symmetrical, antiphase reciprocal, inphase asymmetrical force-right high, inphase asymmetrical force-left high) cycling between low levels (10--30%) of maximal volitional force during three 15-s trials. Bimanual tasks requiring similar activation between the hands were performed more accurately, more quickly, and with less force and timing variability than tasks requiring different actions and/or levels of force to be produced simultaneously. Evidence of force entrainment between the hands was exhibited when force direction (increasing vs. decreasing) was similar between hands but greater relative force was required of the left hand. Lower accuracy and greater variability resulted when controlled decrement of force was required to reach the lower force targets as opposed to the upper force targets which required subjects to increase force. Subjects in the two youngest age groups exhibited lower force accuracy and greater force and timing variability relative to older children and adults. Twelve-year-old subjects approximated adults' performance in all variables.

[1]  Hans Forssberg,et al.  Formation and lateralization of internal representations underlying motor commands during precision grip , 1994, Neuropsychologia.

[2]  G. Ferretti,et al.  Is interhemispheric transfer time related to age? A developmental study , 1994, Behavioural Brain Research.

[3]  S. J. Phillips,et al.  Human interlimb coordination: the first 6 months of independent walking. , 1988, Developmental psychobiology.

[4]  J. Kelso,et al.  Nonequilibrium phase transitions in coordinated biological motion: critical fluctuations , 1986 .

[5]  G. Goldberg Premotor systems, motor learning, and ipsilateral control: Learning to get set , 1987, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[6]  P. N. Kugler,et al.  Patterns of human interlimb coordination emerge from the properties of non-linear, limit cycle oscillatory processes: theory and data. , 1981, Journal of motor behavior.

[7]  D Goodman,et al.  On the coordination of two-handed movements. , 1979, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[8]  G. Goldberg Supplementary motor area structure and function: Review and hypotheses , 1985, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[9]  D. Burke,et al.  Does the nervous system depend on kinesthetic information to control natural limb movements , 1992 .

[10]  J. I. Todor,et al.  Age Differences In The Magnitude Of Associated Movement , 1987, Developmental medicine and child neurology.

[11]  W. Byblow,et al.  The Timing of Intralimb Coordination. , 1999, Journal of motor behavior.

[12]  Gary Kamen,et al.  Unusual motor unit firing behavior in older adults , 1989, Brain Research.

[13]  C. D. De Luca,et al.  Control scheme governing concurrently active human motor units during voluntary contractions , 1982, The Journal of physiology.

[14]  J. Kelso,et al.  Pattern switching in human multilimb coordination dynamics. , 1993, Bulletin of mathematical biology.

[15]  Simon C. Gandevia,et al.  Kinesthesia and unique solutions for control of multijoint movements , 1992, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[16]  K. Newell,et al.  Preload and isometric force variability. , 1990, Journal of Motor Behavior.

[17]  A. Pezé,et al.  Coupling and lateralization in bimanual coordination at 7, 8, and 9 years of age , 1992 .

[18]  T J Koh,et al.  Bilateral deficit is larger for step than for ramp isometric contractions. , 1993, Journal of applied physiology.

[19]  D. Kimura,et al.  Motor functions of the left hemisphere. , 1974, Brain : a journal of neurology.