Commercial Carbon Fibers as Host for Sodium Deposition to Achieve High Volumetric Capacity

The advancement of flexible electronic devices necessitates the utilization of electrode materials that offer robustness and high capacity. In this paper, it is revealed that commercially available carbon fibers with specific microcrystalline structures not only have high mechanical strength but also a high volumetric capacity of up to 300 mAh cm−3, surpassing conventional carbon materials. When multiple structural parameters of carbon fiber reach certain thresholds, a breakthrough in sodium storage capacity and rate performance can be achieved. This study further elucidates the mechanism whereby this specific carbon fiber primarily utilizes an all‐plateau sodium deposition mechanism, which occurs in pore‐like grain boundaries. Through in situ spectroscopy and synchrotron techniques, the reversible deposition process of metallic sodium has been revealed at different scales. Theoretical calculations and thermodynamic principles further confirm the desolvation and deposition mechanisms in carbon fibers. As a result, this research discovers the modulating effects and patterns of crystallinity, defect, and orientation of carbon materials on sodium storage sites and diffusion kinetics, thereby achieving controlled sodium storage. This work shows that commercial carbon fibers can serve as robust hosts for sodium deposition and enhances the theoretical understanding of how the microcrystalline structure of carbon materials relates to sodium storage properties.

[1]  Qi Sun,et al.  Research progress of modified metal current collectors in sodium metal anodes , 2024, Chinese Chemical Letters.

[2]  Dezhi Kong,et al.  Self‐Confinement of Na Metal Deposition in Hollow Carbon Tube Arrays for Ultrastable and High‐Power Sodium Metal Batteries , 2024, Advanced Functional Materials.

[3]  Tianyi Ji,et al.  Potassium ion doped manganese oxide nanoscrolls enhanced the performance of aqueous zinc-ion batteries , 2024, Chinese Chemical Letters.

[4]  Zong-lin Yi,et al.  New insights into the effect of hard carbons microstructure on the diffusion of sodium ions into closed pores , 2023, Chinese Chemical Letters.

[5]  Zengqing Zhuo,et al.  Revealing the Sodium Storage Mechanisms in Hard Carbon Pores , 2023, Advanced Energy Materials.

[6]  Baohua Li,et al.  Recycling of sodium-ion batteries , 2023, Nature Reviews Materials.

[7]  Lin Li,et al.  Boosting the Development of Hard Carbon for Sodium‐Ion Batteries: Strategies to Optimize the Initial Coulombic Efficiency , 2023, Advanced Functional Materials.

[8]  Yanlong Wu,et al.  The Research and Industrialization Progress and Prospects of Sodium Ion Battery , 2023, Journal of Alloys and Compounds.

[9]  Zexiang Shen,et al.  Inspired by nature: Self-fractal cobalt sulfate composite electrode for sodium ion storage , 2023, Chinese Chemical Letters.

[10]  Hong Wang,et al.  Improving the Initial Coulombic Efficiency of Carbonaceous Materials for Li/Na-Ion Batteries: Origins, Solutions, and Perspectives , 2023, Electrochemical Energy Reviews.

[11]  P. Mota‐Santiago,et al.  Effect of Tension During Stabilization on Carbon Fiber Multifunctionality for Structural Battery Composites , 2023, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[12]  Hui Liu,et al.  Thermopressure Coupling Effect Mimicking Natural Graphite Formation to Enhance the Storage K–Ion Performance of Carbonaceous Heterostructures , 2023, Research.

[13]  Wei Chen,et al.  An Ultrathin Nonporous Polymer Separator Regulates Na Transfer Toward Dendrite‐Free Sodium Storage Batteries , 2023, Advanced materials.

[14]  Shichao Wu,et al.  Step-by-step desolvation enables high-rate and ultra-stable sodium storage in hard carbon anodes , 2022, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[15]  Tengsheng Zhang,et al.  Solvated Sodium Storage via a Coadsorptive Mechanism in Microcrystalline Graphite Fiber , 2022, Advanced Energy Materials.

[16]  Chen‐Zi Zhao,et al.  The timescale identification decoupling complicated kinetic processes in lithium batteries , 2022, Joule.

[17]  Quan-hong Yang,et al.  Sieving carbons promise practical anodes with extensible low-potential plateaus for sodium batteries , 2022, National science review.

[18]  Haoshen Zhou,et al.  Tailoring the Solvation Sheath of Cations by Constructing Electrode Front‐Faces for Rechargeable Batteries , 2022, Advanced materials.

[19]  Biao Zhang,et al.  Unraveling the Rate‐Dependent Stability of Metal Anodes and Its Implication in Designing Cycling Protocol , 2021, Advanced Functional Materials.

[20]  Yajing Wang,et al.  A Carbon Foam with Sodiophilic Surface for Highly Reversible, Ultra‐Long Cycle Sodium Metal Anode , 2020, Advanced science.

[21]  X. Zhao,et al.  Hollow Rutile Cuboid Arrays Grown on Carbon Fiber Cloth as a Flexible Electrode for Sodium‐Ion Batteries , 2020, Advanced Functional Materials.

[22]  Yaxiang Lu,et al.  Regulating Pore Structure of Hierarchical Porous Waste Cork‐Derived Hard Carbon Anode for Enhanced Na Storage Performance , 2019, Advanced Energy Materials.

[23]  V. Dravid,et al.  Orientation‐Dependent Intercalation Channels for Lithium and Sodium in Black Phosphorus , 2019, Advanced materials.

[24]  Danielle M. Butts,et al.  Achieving high energy density and high power density with pseudocapacitive materials , 2019, Nature Reviews Materials.

[25]  Jun Lu,et al.  Cross-linked beta alumina nanowires with compact gel polymer electrolyte coating for ultra-stable sodium metal battery , 2019, Nature Communications.

[26]  G. G. Eshetu,et al.  Impact of the electrolyte salt anion on the solid electrolyte interphase formation in sodium ion batteries , 2019, Nano Energy.

[27]  S. Passerini,et al.  A cost and resource analysis of sodium-ion batteries , 2018 .

[28]  W. Goddard,et al.  Origin of low sodium capacity in graphite and generally weak substrate binding of Na and Mg among alkali and alkaline earth metals , 2016, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[29]  Ting Hei Wan,et al.  Influence of the Discretization Methods on the Distribution of Relaxation Times Deconvolution: Implementing Radial Basis Functions with DRTtools , 2015 .

[30]  Sergei Manzhos,et al.  A computational study of Na behavior on graphene , 2015 .

[31]  I. Bertóti,et al.  Surface modification of graphene and graphite by nitrogen plasma: Determination of chemical state alterations and assignments by quantitative X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy , 2015 .

[32]  D. Basko,et al.  Raman spectroscopy as a versatile tool for studying the properties of graphene. , 2013, Nature nanotechnology.

[33]  Chun Li,et al.  Role of boundary layer diffusion in vapor deposition growth of chalcogenide nanosheets: the case of GeS. , 2012, ACS nano.

[34]  James F. Snyder,et al.  Evaluation of Commercially Available Carbon Fibers, Fabrics, and Papers for Potential Use in Multifunctional Energy Storage Applications , 2009 .

[35]  M. Fujita,et al.  Real-Time Synchrotron SAXS and WAXD Studies on Annealing Behavior of Poly[(R)-3-hydroxybutyrate] Single Crystals , 2006 .

[36]  K. Kang,et al.  Conditions for Reversible Na Intercalation in Graphite: Theoretical Studies on the Interplay Among Guest Ions, Solvent, and Graphite Host , 2017 .

[37]  K. Kang,et al.  Sodium Storage Behavior in Natural Graphite using Ether‐based Electrolyte Systems , 2015 .

[38]  David R. Ely,et al.  Heterogeneous Nucleation and Growth of Lithium Electrodeposits on Negative Electrodes , 2013 .

[39]  A. Barrie,et al.  An Auger and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopic study of sodium metal and sodium oxide , 1975 .