Multiple frameworks?: Evidence of manifold conceptions in individual cognitive structure

Some literature reports how learners' alternative ideas in science may be coherent, stable and theory-like. However, other commentators suggest that the available data supports the view that children's thinking is inconsistent, with elicited notions being piecemeal, ad hoc and deeply situated in specific contexts. This is considered to reflect the fragmentary and unscientific nature of the learner's knowledge. Accumulating evidence from in-depth work with individual learners is beginning to show that models of cognitive structure that can usefully inform teaching may need to be more complex than either of these views admit. Evidence from a case study is presented to show how a learner may simultaneously hold several alternative explanatory schemes, each of which is persistent over time and applied coherently across a wide range of overlapping contexts. It is argued that the manifold nature of learners' conceptions may be a key to modelling conceptual development.

[1]  D. Ausubel,et al.  School learning;: An introduction to educational psychology , 1969 .

[2]  R. Driver,et al.  Pupils and Paradigms: a Review of Literature Related to Concept Development in Adolescent Science Students , 1978 .

[3]  L. Viennot.  Spontaneous Reasoning in Elementary Dynamics. , 1979 .

[4]  John K. Gilbert,et al.  Children's science and its consequences for teaching , 1982 .

[5]  D. M. Watts,et al.  Gravity - don't take it for granted! , 1982 .

[6]  John K. Gilbert,et al.  Concepts, Misconceptions and Alternative Conceptions: Changing Perspectives in Science Education , 1983 .

[7]  John K. Gilbert,et al.  Enigmas in School Science: students’ conceptions for scientifically associated words , 1983 .

[8]  D. M. Watts,et al.  Some alternative views of energy , 1983 .

[9]  John K. Gilbert,et al.  Personal Experience and the Construction of Knowledge in Science. , 1983 .

[10]  D. Michael Watts.  A study of schoolchildren's alternative frameworks of the concept of force , 1983 .

[11]  Alternative views of energy , 1984 .

[12]  M. Carr.  Model confusion in chemistry , 1984 .

[13]  Joseph D. Novak,et al.  Constructing vee maps for clinical interviews on molecule concepts , 1984 .

[14]  R. Driver,et al.  Children's Ideas in Science , 1985 .

[15]  L. Viennot.  Analyzing students’ reasoning: Tendencies in interpretation , 1985 .

[16]  B. Andersson,et al.  The experiential gestalt of causation: a common core to pupils’ preconceptions in science , 1986 .

[17]  Guy Claxton.  The Alternative Conceivers' Conceptions , 1986 .

[18]  Maureen Pope,et al.  Intuitive Theories—a Researcher's Dilemma: some practical methodological implications , 1986 .

[19]  Neil Mercer,et al.  Common Knowledge: The Development of Understanding in the Classroom , 1987 .

[20]  Secondary school pupils' understanding of some key physics concepts , 1987 .

[21]  Mike Watts.  From concept maps to curriculum signposts , 1988 .

[22]  A longitudinal study of dynamics concepts , 1988 .

[23]  I. O. Abimbola,et al.  The Problem of Terminology in the Study of Student Conceptions in Science. , 1988 .

[24]  Reinders Duit,et al.  Students' Alternative Frameworks and Science Education. Bibliography. 3rd Edition. IPN Reports-in-Brief = Alltagsvorstellungen und Naturwissenschaftlicher Unterricht. Bibliographie. 3. Auflage. IPN-Kurzberichte. , 1991 .

[25]  Saouma BouJaoude,et al.  A study of the nature of students' understandings about the concept of burning , 1991 .

[26]  S. Vosniadou.  Knowledge Acquisition and Conceptual Change , 1992 .

[27]  Justin Dillon,et al.  Pupils' understanding of combustion , 1992 .

[28]  G. Posner,et al.  A revisionist theory of conceptual change , 1992 .

[29]  Joan Solomon,et al.  Getting To Know About Energy In School And Society , 1992 .

[30]  Robert S. Siegler,et al.  DavidConceptual competition in physics learning , 1993 .

[31]  R. Driver,et al.  Making Sense of Secondary Science: Research into children’s ideas , 1993 .

[32]  Sara Hennessy,et al.  Situated Cognition and Cognitive Apprenticeship: Implications for Classroom Learning , 1993 .

[33]  Cedric Linder,et al.  A challenge to conceptual change , 1993 .

[34]  Ola Halldén,et al.  Re-framing the problem of conceptual change , 1994 .

[35]  Jaap Kuiper,et al.  Student ideas of science concepts: alternative frameworks? , 1994 .

[36]  J. Roschelle,et al.  Misconceptions Reconceived: A Constructivist Analysis of Knowledge in Transition , 1994 .

[37]  Keith S. Taber,et al.  Development of Student Understanding: a case study of stability and lability in cognitive structure , 1995 .

[38]  Questioning and conceptual understanding: the quality of pupils' questions in science , 1995 .

[39]  S. Kvale.  Interviews : an introduction to qualitative research interviewing , 1996 .

[40]  Mike Watts,et al.  The secret life of the chemical bond: students’ anthropomorphic and animistic references to bonding , 1996 .

[41]  Jazlin Ebenezer,et al.  Chemistry students' conceptions of solubility: A phenomenography , 1996 .

[42]  Constructivism and evidence from children's ideas , 1996 .

[43]  Keith S. Taber.  Student Understanding of Ionic Bonding: Molecular versus Electrostatic Framework?. , 1997 .

[44]  Justin Dillon,et al.  Consistency of students' explanations about combustion , 1997 .

[45]  David Palmer,et al.  The effect of context on students’ reasoning about forces , 1997 .

[46]  Understanding Chemical Bonding: The Development of A Level Students' Understanding of the Concept of Chemical Bonding. , 1997 .

[47]  Mike Watts,et al.  Constructivism and concept learning in chemistry: perspectives from a case study , 1997 .

[48]  José María de Posada.  Conceptions of high school students concerning the internal structure of metals and their electric conduction: structure and evolution , 1997 .

[49]  Hans Niedderer,et al.  A learning pathway in high‐school level quantum atomic physics , 1998 .

[50]  Russell Tytler,et al.  Children's conceptions of air pressure: exploring the nature of conceptual change , 1998 .

[51]  Philip Johnson,et al.  Progression in children's understanding of a ‘basic’ particle theory: a longitudinal study , 1998 .

[52]  Keith S. Taber.  The sharing‐out of nuclear attraction: or ‘I can't think about physics in chemistry’ , 1998 .

[53]  Keith S. Taber,et al.  An alternative conceptual framework from chemistry education , 1998 .

[54]  Russell Tytler,et al.  The Nature of Students' Informal Science Conceptions. , 1998 .

[55]  Keith S. Taber.  ALTERNATIVE FRAMEWORKS IN CHEMISTRY , 1999 .

[56]  Keith S. Taber,et al.  Case studies and generalizability: grounded theory and research in science education , 2000 .

[57]  K. Taber.  Shifting sands: a case study of conceptual development as competition between alternative conceptions , 2001 .

[58]  Guy Claxton,et al.  Minitheories: a preliminary model for learning science , 2002 .

[59]  An alternative conception: representing representations , 2002 .

[60]  J. Solomon.  The social construction of children’s scientific knowledge , 2002 .