Creating More Credible and Persuasive Recommender Systems: The Influence of Source Characteristics on Recommender System Evaluations

Whether users are likely to accept the recommendations provided by a recommender system is of utmost importance to system designers and the marketers who implement them. By conceptualizing the advice seeking and giving relationship as a fundamentally social process, important avenues for understanding the persuasiveness of recommender systems open up. Specifically, research regarding the influence of source characteristics, which is abundant in the context of humanhuman relationships, can provide an important framework for identifying potential influence factors. This chapter reviews the existing literature on source characteristics in the context of human-human, human-computer, and human-recommender system interactions. It concludes that many social cues that have been identified as influential in other contexts have yet to be implemented and tested with respect to recommender systems. Implications for recommender system research and design are discussed.

[1]  Sean M. McNee,et al.  Interfaces for Eliciting New User Preferences in Recommender Systems , 2003, User Modeling.

[2]  M. Angela Sasse,et al.  "I thought it was terrible and everyone else loved it" - A New Perspective for Effective Recommender System Design , 2005, BCS HCI.

[3]  R. Kohli,et al.  Internet Recommendation Systems , 2000 .

[4]  Kyung Hyan Yoo,et al.  The Influence of Perceived Credibility on Preferences for Recommender Systems as Sources of Advice , 2008, J. Inf. Technol. Tour..

[5]  Anita Elberse,et al.  MARKETING AND THE INTERNET: A RESEARCH REVIEW 1 , 2000 .

[6]  Teresa A. Swartz.  Relationship between Source Expertise and Source Similarity in an Advertising Context , 1984 .

[7]  Joann Horai,et al.  The Effects of Expertise and Physical Attractiveness Upon Opinion Agreement and Liking , 1974 .

[8]  Gary H. McClelland,et al.  The effect of site design and interattribute correlations on interactive web-based decisions , 2005 .

[9]  Andrew J. Cowell,et al.  Manipulation of non-verbal interaction style and demographic embodiment to increase anthropomorphic computer character credibility , 2005, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[10]  Bernard Moulin,et al.  Explanation and Argumentation Capabilities:Towards the Creation of More Persuasive Agents , 2002, Artificial Intelligence Review.

[11]  Lingyun Qiu.  Designing social interactions with animated avatars and speech output for product recommendation agents in electronic commerce , 2006 .

[12]  J. Burgoon,et al.  Nonverbal Behaviors, Persuasion, and Credibility , 1990 .

[13]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  E-Commerce Product Recommendation Agents: Use, Characteristics, and Impact , 2007, MIS Q..

[14]  B. J. Fogg,et al.  Persuasive technology: using computers to change what we think and do , 2002, UBIQ.

[15]  Elena Delgado-Ballester,et al.  Applicability of a brand trust scale across product categories , 2004 .

[16]  Eric T. Bradlow,et al.  Agents to the Rescue? , 1999 .

[17]  Pietro Murano,et al.  Anthropomorphic Vs non-anthropomorphic software interface feedback for online factual delivery , 2002, Proceedings on Seventh International Conference on Information Visualization, 2003. IV 2003..

[18]  C. Insko,et al.  COGNITIVE CONSISTENCY AND PERFORMANCE IN THE AUTOKINETIC SITUATION. , 1964, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[19]  Nada Nasr Bechwati,et al.  Do Computers Sweat? The Impact of Perceived Effort of Online Decision Aids on Consumers’ Satisfaction With the Decision Process , 2003 .

[20]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  Understanding Customer Trust in Agent-Mediated Electronic Commerce, Web-Mediated Electronic Commerce, and Traditional Commerce , 2004, Inf. Technol. Manag..

[21]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  Trust In and Adoption of Online Recommendation Agents , 2005, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[22]  Kirsten Swearingen,et al.  Beyond Algorithms: An HCI Perspective on Recommender Systems , 2001 .

[23]  M. Gilly,et al.  A dyadic study of interpersonal information search , 1998 .

[24]  D. O’Keefe.  Justification Explicitness and Persuasive Effect: A Meta-Analytic Review of the Effects of Varying Support Articulation in Persuasive Messages. , 1998 .

[25]  S. Chaiken,et al.  An attribution analysis of the effect of communicator characteristics on opinion change: The case of communicator attractiveness. , 1975 .

[26]  Robert Hopper,et al.  Relationships between speech delivery and speech effectiveness , 1976 .

[27]  Donnavieve N. Smith,et al.  Online Peer and Editorial Recommendations, Trust, and Choice in Virtual Markets , 2005 .

[28]  John Riedl,et al.  Explaining collaborative filtering recommendations , 2000, CSCW '00.

[29]  S. Sénécal,et al.  The influence of online product recommendations on consumers' online choices , 2004 .

[30]  Rex Eugene Perera.  Optimizing Human-Computer Interaction for the Electronic Commerce Environment , 2000, J. Electron. Commer. Res..

[31]  D. Byrne.  The Attraction Paradigm , 1971 .

[32]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  Recommendation Agents for Electronic Commerce: Effects of Explanation Facilities on Trusting Beliefs , 2007, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[33]  Helen Fleshler,et al.  The influence of field dependence, speaker credibility set, and message documentation on evaluations of speaker and message credibility , 1974 .

[34]  Ellen Timminga,et al.  Persuasiveness of expert systems , 1998, Behav. Inf. Technol..

[35]  Clifford Nass,et al.  Are Computers Gender-Neutral? Gender Stereotypic Responses to Computers , 1997 .

[36]  Qinyu Liao,et al.  Empirical findings on persuasiveness of recommender systems for customer decision support in electronic commerce , 2005 .

[37]  H. Giles,et al.  Language: Contexts and Consequences , 1991 .

[38]  Robin D. Burke,et al.  Hybrid Recommender Systems: Survey and Experiments , 2002, User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction.

[39]  Kristine L. Nowak.  The Influence of Anthropomorphism and Agency on Social Judgment in Virtual Environments , 2006, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[40]  James Price Dillard,et al.  The Persuasion Handbook: Developments in Theory and Practice , 2002 .

[41]  Barton A. Weitz,et al.  Marketing the Unfamiliar: The Role of Context and Item-Specific Information in Electronic Agent Recommendations , 2002 .

[42]  Gary Klein,et al.  Persuasive expert systems: the influence of confidence and discrepancy , 2000 .

[43]  Youngme Moon,et al.  Personalization and Personality: Some Effects of Customizing Message Style Based on Consumer Personality , 2002 .

[44]  Mark A. Fuller,et al.  Involvement and Decision-Making Performance with a Decision Aid: The Influence of Social Multimedia, Gender, and Playfulness , 2005, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[45]  Clifford Nass,et al.  The media equation - how people treat computers, television, and new media like real people and places , 1996 .

[46]  S. Chaiken,et al.  Causal inferences about communicators and their effect on opinion change , 1978 .

[47]  C. Nass,et al.  Truth is beauty: researching embodied conversational agents , 2001 .

[48]  Michael A. Hogg,et al.  Group Prototypically and Depersonalized Attraction in Small Interactive Groups , 1993 .

[49]  David W. Addington.  The effect of vocal variations on ratings of source credibility , 1971 .

[50]  S. Fiske,et al.  Social Psychology , 2019, Encyclopedia of Personality and Individual Differences.

[51]  Shelby D. Hunt,et al.  Attributional Processes and Effects in Promotional Situations , 1978 .

[52]  D. O’Keefe.  Persuasion : theory & research , 2002 .

[53]  Jennings Bryant,et al.  EFFECTS OF HUMOROUS ILLUSTRATIONS IN COLLEGE TEXTBOOKS , 1981 .

[54]  Barry Smyth,et al.  Deep Dialogue vs Casual Conversation in Recommender Systems , 2002 .

[55]  James C. McCroskey,et al.  The effects of evidence as an inhibitor of counter‐persuasion , 1970 .

[56]  J. Cassell,et al.  Embodied conversational agents , 2000 .

[57]  Erik J. Engstrom,et al.  EFFECTS OF NONFLUENCIES ON SPEAKER'S CREDIBILITY IN NEWSCAST SETTINGS , 1994 .

[58]  Kyung Hyan Yoo,et al.  Creating More Credible and Likable Travel Recommender Systems: The Influence of Virtual Agents on Travel Recommender System Evaluation , 2010 .

[59]  Kyung Hyan Yoo,et al.  The Influence of Virtual Representatives on Recommender System Evaluation , 2009, AMCIS.

[60]  John Riedl,et al.  Meta-recommendation systems: user-controlled integration of diverse recommendations , 2002, CIKM '02.

[61]  C. Nass,et al.  Machines and Mindlessness , 2000 .

[62]  John Riedl,et al.  Is seeing believing?: how recommender system interfaces affect users' opinions , 2003, CHI '03.

[63]  Tomoko Koda,et al.  Agents with faces : a study on the effects of personification of software agents , 1996 .

[64]  Joel Cooper,et al.  Complex scientific testimony: How do jurors make decisions? , 1996 .

[65]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  The Role of Design Characteristics in Shaping Perceptions of Similarity: The Case of Online Shopping Assistants , 2006, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[66]  Mary Jo Bitner,et al.  The role of employee effort in satisfaction with service transactions , 1995 .

[67]  B. J. Fogg,et al.  Silicon sycophants: the effects of computers that flatter , 1997, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[68]  S. Kiesler,et al.  A Prisoner's Dilemma Experiment on Cooperation With People and Human-Like Computers , 1996 .

[69]  Clinton Golding,et al.  Reshaping Environments: An interdisciplinary approach , 2012 .

[70]  C. Nass,et al.  How “Real” Are Computer Personalities? , 1996 .

[71]  Ron Tamborini,et al.  College Students' Perception of Lecturers Using Humor , 1981 .

[72]  Weiquan Wang.  Design of trustworthy online recommendation agents: explanation facilities and decision strategy support , 2005 .

[73]  Pat M. Taylor.  An experimental study of humor and ethos , 1974 .

[74]  Lior Rokach.  Mining manufacturing data using genetic algorithm-based feature set decomposition , 2008, Int. J. Intell. Syst. Technol. Appl..

[75]  Jeffery Pittam.  Voice in social interaction , 1994 .

[76]  H. Schliesser.  Information transmission and ethos of a speaker using normal and defective speech , 1968 .

[77]  Lee Sproull,et al.  Cooperating with life-like interface agents , 1999 .

[78]  S. Fiske,et al.  The Handbook of Social Psychology , 1935 .

[79]  William E. Lampton,et al.  Effects of including humorous material in a persuasive sermon , 1972 .

[80]  Clifford Nass,et al.  Effects of Humor in Task-Oriented Human-Computer Interaction and Computer-Mediated Communication: A Direct Test of SRCT Theory , 1999, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[81]  Li Chen,et al.  Trust-inspiring explanation interfaces for recommender systems , 2007, Knowl. Based Syst..

[82]  Ulrike Gretzel,et al.  Persuasion in Recommender Systems , 2006, Int. J. Electron. Commer..

[83]  Christian Rauh,et al.  The Influence of the Avatar on Online Perceptions of Anthropomorphism, Androgyny, Credibility, Homophily, and Attraction , 2005, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[84]  Abhijit Chaudhury,et al.  An empirical investigation of decision-making satisfaction in web-based decision support systems , 2004, Decis. Support Syst..

[85]  Chris Janiszewski,et al.  The Influence of Avatars on Online Consumer Shopping Behavior , 2006 .

[86]  James C. Lester,et al.  The Case for Social Agency in Computer-Based Teaching: Do Students Learn More Deeply When They Interact With Animated Pedagogical Agents? , 2001 .

[87]  Kim Giffin,et al.  The attitudinal effects of a group discussion on a proposed change in company policy , 1963 .

[88]  C. Kimble,et al.  Opinion change as a function of perceived similarity of the communicator and subjectivity of the issue , 1973 .

[89]  Robert R. Harmon,et al.  The Persuasive Effects of Source Credibility in Buy and Lease Situations , 1982 .

[90]  P. Lazarsfeld,et al.  Friendship as Social process: a substantive and methodological analysis , 1964 .

[91]  G. Miller,et al.  Source credibility and response to fear‐arousing communications , 1965 .

[92]  Alistair G. Sutcliffe,et al.  Evaluating the effectiveness of visual user interfaces for information retrieval , 2000, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[93]  Frank Biocca,et al.  The Effect of the Agency and Anthropomorphism on Users' Sense of Telepresence, Copresence, and Social Presence in Virtual Environments , 2003, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.

[94]  Lee Sproull,et al.  When the Interface Is a Face , 1996, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[95]  Charles R. Gruner,et al.  “Sick” jokes, speaker sex, and informative speech , 1981 .

[96]  G. Häubl,et al.  Preference Construction and Persistence in Digital Marketplaces: The Role of Electronic Recommendation Agents , 2003 .

[97]  Morroe Berger,et al.  Freedom and control in modern society , 1954 .

[98]  TzengJeng-Yi.  Toward a more civilized design , 2004 .

[99]  J. Cacioppo,et al.  Attitudes and Persuasion: Classic and Contemporary Approaches , 1981 .

[100]  Linda L. Carli,et al.  Similarity and Satisfaction in Roommate Relationships , 1991 .

[101]  C. Nass,et al.  Are Machines Gender Neutral? Gender‐Stereotypic Responses to Computers With Voices , 1997 .

[102]  C. Nass,et al.  Are People Polite to Computers? Responses to Computer-Based Interviewing Systems1 , 1999 .

[103]  Markus Stolze,et al.  Feature-Oriented vs. Needs-Oriented Product Access for Non-Expert-Online Shoppers , 2001, I3E.

[104]  Khalil Sima'an,et al.  Wired for Speech: How Voice Activates and Advances the Human-Computer Relationship , 2006, Computational Linguistics.

[105]  Nicholas H. Lurie,et al.  Should Recommendation Agents Think Like People? , 2006 .

[106]  Charles R. Crowell,et al.  Human-computer interaction: A preliminary social psychological analysis , 1982 .

[107]  Jeng-Yi Tzeng,et al.  Toward a more civilized design: studying the effects of computers that apologize , 2004, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[108]  Zoonky Lee,et al.  The Impact of the Web-Based Product Recommendation System from Previous Buyers on Consumers' Purchasing Behavior , 2004, AMCIS.

[109]  Sherrie Y. X Weiquan Izak Komiak,et al.  Trust Building in Virtual Salespersons Versus in Human Salespersons: Similarities and Differences , 2004 .

[110]  H. Kelley,et al.  Communication And Persuasion , 1953 .

[111]  B. J. Fogg,et al.  Can computers be teammates? , 1996, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[112]  Henry H. Emurian,et al.  An overview of online trust: Concepts, elements, and implications , 2005, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[113]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  Virtual Product Experience: Effects of Visual and Functional Control of Products on Perceived Diagnosticity and Flow in Electronic Shopping , 2004, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[114]  William O. Bearden,et al.  Norm Extremity and Interpersonal Influences on Consumer Conformity , 1995 .

[115]  J. H. Davis,et al.  An Integrative Model Of Organizational Trust , 1995 .

[116]  Andrew Winzelberg,et al.  Ethnicity locus of control for family planning and pregnancy counselor credibility. , 1985 .

[117]  Dennis N. Bristow,et al.  Formal or Informal? The Impact of Style of Dress and Forms of Address on Business Students' Perceptions of Professors , 2008 .

[118]  Jonathan Marshall,et al.  Interactive Technology and Persuasion , 2002 .

[119]  James C. McCroskey,et al.  The effects of disorganization and nonfluency on attitude change and source credibility , 1969 .

[120]  Mark Snyder,et al.  Communicator attractiveness and opinion change. , 1971 .

[121]  Pattie Maes,et al.  Agents that buy and sell , 1999, CACM.

[122]  J. Burgoon,et al.  Interpersonal Deception Theory , 1996 .

[123]  Richard E. Mayer,et al.  Constructing computer-based tutors that are socially sensitive: Politeness in educational software , 2006, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[124]  Keith P. Sentis,et al.  Advertising and consumer psychology , 1986 .

[125]  Judith Masthoff,et al.  Effective explanations of recommendations: user-centered design , 2007, RecSys '07.

[126]  A. Eagly,et al.  What is beautiful is good, but…: A meta-analytic review of research on the physical attractiveness stereotype. , 1991 .

[127]  Kenneth E. Andersen,et al.  A summary of experimental research in ethos , 1963 .

[128]  Charles R. Gruner,et al.  Audience reaction to self‐disparaging humor , 1981 .

[129]  Robert B. Cialdini,et al.  The Business of Influence: Principles That Lead to Success in Commercial Settings , 2002 .

[130]  C. K. Hofling,et al.  AN EXPERIMENTAL STUDY IN NURSE‐PHYSICIAN RELATIONSHIPS , 1966, The Journal of nervous and mental disease.

[131]  J. Pittam.  Voice in Social Interaction: An Interdisciplinary Approach , 1994 .

[132]  John Riedl,et al.  View through MetaLens: usage patterns for a meta-recommendation system , 2004, IEE Proc. Softw..

[133]  Kirsten Swearingen,et al.  Interaction Design for Recommender Systems , 2002 .

[134]  Rashmi R. Sinha,et al.  Comparing Recommendations Made by Online Systems and Friends , 2001, DELOS.

[135]  Leonard Bickman,et al.  The social power of a uniform. , 1974 .

[136]  Judith Masthoff,et al.  Persuasive Effects of Embodied Conversational Agent Teams , 2007, HCI.

[137]  E MayerRichard,et al.  Constructing computer-based tutors that are socially sensitive , 2006 .

[138]  Maria Virvou,et al.  Evaluating the Persona Effect of an Interface Agent in an Intelligent Tutoring System , 2002 .

[139]  J. Delia,et al.  Regional dialect, message acceptance, and perceptions of the speaker , 1975 .

[140]  Franziska Marquart,et al.  Communication and persuasion : central and peripheral routes to attitude change , 1988 .

[141]  Byung-Do Kim,et al.  A new recommender system to combine content-based and collaborative filtering systems , 2001 .

[142]  J. Ben Schafer,et al.  DynamicLens: A Dynamic User-Interface for a Meta-Recommendation System , 2005 .