Parameters influence on acceleration and deceleration capacity based on trans-abdominal ECG in early fetal growth restriction at different gestational age epochs.

OBJECTIVE Intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR) is characterized by chronic nutrient deprivation and hypoxemia that alters the autonomous nervous system regulation of fetal heart rate variability (fHRV). Phase-rectified signal averaging (PRSA) is a new algorithm capable to identify periodic and quasi-periodic patterns of HR, and which is used to quantify the average acceleration and deceleration capacity (AC/DC) of the heart. The computation of AC/DC depends on the parameters T and s, which we set so that s=T. T and s determine the periodicities that can be detected (the larger T the smaller the frequency of oscillations for which the method is most sensitive). The aim of the study was to evaluate the influence of the parameter T on PRSA computation, based on trans-abdominally acquired fetal ECG (ta-fECG), in early IUGR (<34 weeks of gestation) at two different gestational age epochs. STUDY DESIGN AC/DC were calculated for different T values (1÷45) on fetal RR intervals derived from ta-fECG in 22 IUGR and in 37 appropriate for gestational age (AGA) fetuses matched for gestational age, in two gestational age epochs: very preterm group (≥26÷<30 weeks), and preterm group (≥30÷<34 weeks), respectively. RESULTS AC/DC were significantly lower in IUGR than in AGA fetuses for all T≥5 values (p<0.05). The best area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) in identifying IUGR at time of recording was observed for T9 [AUC AC-T9 0.87, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.77-0.96; and AUC DC-T9 0.89, 95% CI 0.81-0.98), and in range of T 7÷15. In the same T interval, AC/DC were significantly lower in very preterm than in preterm IUGR group (p<0.05), while there were no differences in AGA fetuses at two gestational age epochs (p>0.05), respectively. The AUCs of AC-T9 and DC-T9 significantly outperformed that obtained by short-term variation (AUC 0.77, 95% CI 0.65-0.90; p=0.009 and p=0.003, respectively). CONCLUSIONS Our study shows that within the range of T parameter 1÷45, T=9 proved to be the best value to discriminate the AC and DC of the fetal heart rate of IUGR from AGA fetuses prior to 34 weeks of gestation. These significant differences are emphasized in very preterm gestational age epochs.

[1]  M. Malik,et al.  Deceleration capacity of heart rate as a predictor of mortality after myocardial infarction: cohort study , 2006, The Lancet.

[2]  J. Crowe,et al.  Compact long-term recorder for the transabdominal foetal and maternal electrocardiogram , 2006, Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing.

[3]  R. Gagnon,et al.  A comparison between visual and computer analysis of antepartum fetal heart rate tracings. , 1993, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[4]  A. W. Woods,et al.  Rheological and Physiological Consequences of Conversion of the Maternal Spiral Arteries for Uteroplacental Blood Flow during Human Pregnancy , 2009, Placenta.

[5]  Eduard Gratacós,et al.  Differences in cortical development assessed by fetal MRI in late-onset intrauterine growth restriction. , 2013, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[6]  J. Parer,et al.  Increased fetal heart rate variability with acute hypoxia in chronically instrumented sheep. , 1980, European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology.

[7]  B Vasak,et al.  Average acceleration and deceleration capacity of fetal heart rate in normal pregnancy and in pregnancies complicated by fetal growth restriction , 2012, The journal of maternal-fetal & neonatal medicine : the official journal of the European Association of Perinatal Medicine, the Federation of Asia and Oceania Perinatal Societies, the International Society of Perinatal Obstetricians.

[8]  G. Breithardt,et al.  Heart rate variability: standards of measurement, physiological interpretation and clinical use. Task Force of the European Society of Cardiology and the North American Society of Pacing and Electrophysiology. , 1996 .

[9]  R. Gagnon,et al.  Fetal heart rate patterns in growth-restricted fetal sheep induced by chronic fetal placental embolization. , 1997, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[10]  M. Moulden,et al.  A computer system for the numerical analysis of nonstress tests. , 2002, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[11]  J. Thorp,et al.  Intrauterine growth restriction increases morbidity and mortality among premature neonates. , 2004, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[12]  Roberto Sassi,et al.  A methodological assessment of Phase-Rectified Signal Averaging through simulated beat-to-beat interval time series , 2014, Computing in Cardiology 2014.

[13]  K. Nicolaides,et al.  Relation of fetal blood gases and data from computer‐assisted analysis of fetal heart rate patterns in small for gestation fetuses , 1991, British journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.

[14]  T Suzuki,et al.  Power spectral analysis of R-R interval variability before and during the sinusoidal heart rate pattern in fetal lambs. , 2000, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[15]  T. Schuster,et al.  Phase-rectified signal averaging as a new method for surveillance of growth restricted fetuses , 2012, The journal of maternal-fetal & neonatal medicine : the official journal of the European Association of Perinatal Medicine, the Federation of Asia and Oceania Perinatal Societies, the International Society of Perinatal Obstetricians.

[16]  G Schmidt,et al.  New computerized fetal heart rate analysis for surveillance of intrauterine growth restriction , 2011, Prenatal diagnosis.

[17]  Eugenia K. Pallotto,et al.  Perinatal Outcome and Later Implications of Intrauterine Growth Restriction , 2006, Clinical obstetrics and gynecology.

[18]  J. V. van Laar,et al.  Spectral analysis of fetal heart rate variability for fetal surveillance: review of the literature , 2008, Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica.

[19]  Roberto Sassi,et al.  Acceleration and Deceleration Capacity of Fetal Heart Rate in an In-Vivo Sheep Model , 2014, PloS one.

[20]  M. Malik,et al.  Phase-rectified signal averaging detects quasi-periodicities in non-stationary data , 2006 .

[21]  K. Rosen,et al.  Do spectral bands of fetal heart rate variability associate with concomitant fetal scalp pH? , 2013, Early human development.

[22]  Sandra Hernandez,et al.  Visual analysis of antepartum fetal heart rate tracings: inter- and intra-observer agreement and impact of knowledge of neonatal outcome , 2005, Journal of perinatal medicine.

[23]  S J Payne,et al.  Phase‐rectified signal averaging for intrapartum electronic fetal heart rate monitoring is related to acidaemia at birth , 2014, BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.

[24]  E. Mulder,et al.  Numeric analysis of heart rate variation in intrauterine growth-retarded fetuses: a longitudinal study. , 1992, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[25]  Marek Malik,et al.  Phase-rectified signal averaging for the detection of quasi-periodicities and the prediction of cardiovascular risk. , 2007, Chaos.

[26]  G. Pardi,et al.  An evaluation of fetal glucogenesis in intrauterine growth-retarded pregnancies. , 1993, Metabolism: clinical and experimental.

[27]  R. Cohen,et al.  Power spectrum analysis of heart rate fluctuation: a quantitative probe of beat-to-beat cardiovascular control. , 1981, Science.

[28]  C R Brinkman,et al.  Development of neurohumoral control of fetal, neonatal, and adult cardiovascular functions. , 1977, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[29]  E. Ferrazzi,et al.  Perinatal morbidity and mortality in early‐onset fetal growth restriction: cohort outcomes of the trial of randomized umbilical and fetal flow in Europe (TRUFFLE) , 2013, Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

[30]  K. Nicolaides,et al.  Antepartum heart rate patterns in small-for-gestational-age third-trimester fetuses: correlations with blood gas values obtained at cordocentesis. , 1990, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[31]  Sergio Cerutti,et al.  Linear and nonlinear parameters for the analysisof fetal heart rate signal from cardiotocographic recordings , 2003, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[32]  L. Gagliardi,et al.  Neonatal Anthropometric Charts: The Italian Neonatal Study Compared With Other European Studies , 2010, Journal of pediatric gastroenterology and nutrition.

[33]  R. Romero,et al.  Timing the delivery of the preterm severely growth‐restricted fetus: venous Doppler, cardiotocography or the biophysical profile? , 2002, Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.