Acoustic and perceptual evidence of a complex relation between F1 and F0 in determining vowel height

An acoustic analysis of five vowels of American English [I, e, ae, α, Λ], spoken by three speakers, showed that in the dimension representing vowel height, individual differences for low vowels were reduced when the vowels are represented by the (F1 - F10) difference rather than by F1. However, individual differences for high vowels were increased by the use of the same distance. Results of perceptual experiments using synthetic CVC and one-formant stimuli were in agreement with the observations based on the acoustic analysis. They suggest that the relation between F1 and F0 depends on the ranges of both F0 and F1 values. A possible interpretation consists in giving to F0 the role of an anchor point when both F0 and F1 are sufficiently high, while the extreme end of the scale would serve as the reference point when F0 or F1 assume values in the low frequency range.

[1]  Keith Johnson,et al.  The role of perceived speaker identity in F0 normalization of vowels. , 1990, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[2]  Maria-Gabriella Di Benedetto Vowel representation: Some observations on temporal and spectral properties of the first formant frequency , 1989 .

[3]  Dennis H. Klatt,et al.  Software for a cascade/parallel formant synthesizer , 1980 .

[4]  R. Miller Auditory Tests with Synthetic Vowels , 1951 .

[5]  H. Wakita Normalization of vowels by vocal-tract length and its application to vowel identification , 1977 .

[6]  A. House,et al.  The Influence of Consonant Environment upon the Secondary Acoustical Characteristics of Vowels , 1953 .

[7]  Maria-Gabriella Di Benedetto Frequency and time variations of the first formant: Properties relevant to the perception of vowel height , 1989 .

[8]  G. E. Peterson,et al.  Control Methods Used in a Study of the Vowels , 1951 .

[9]  J. C. Steinberg,et al.  Toward the Specification of Speech , 1950 .

[10]  E. Zwicker,et al.  Analytical expressions for critical‐band rate and critical bandwidth as a function of frequency , 1980 .

[11]  Keith Johnson,et al.  Contrast and normalization in vowel perception , 1990 .

[12]  H. S. Gopal,et al.  A perceptual model of vowel recognition based on the auditory representation of American English vowels. , 1986, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[13]  H. Traunmüller Perceptual dimension of openness in vowels. , 1981, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[14]  Ann K. Syrdal,et al.  Aspects of a model of the auditory representation of american english vowels , 1985, Speech Commun..

[15]  B. Delgutte,et al.  Speech coding in the auditory nerve: I. Vowel-like sounds. , 1984, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.