Effects of Non-Zero Minimum Pressure Heads in Non-iterative Application of EPANET 2 in Pressure-Dependent Volume-Driven Analysis of Water Distribution Networks

While analysing a real network, the assumption of zero minimum pressure head as the elevation of demand node may lead to unrealistic results as some residual pressure is necessary to derive any outflow at the node. A more realistic minimum pressure head plays an important role for analysis of an existing or proposed network. The present study extends a novel method of pressure-dependent volume driven-analysis by investigating the effects of realistic minimum pressure heads. The novelty of the proposed method is to evaluate the practical impact of the zero minimum pressure head assumption under pressure-deficient condition in water distribution networks considering pipe isolation, fire demand, and altering total reservoir heads. The results obtained from the present method are compared with the results based on the more optimistic traditional assumption of zero minimum residual pressure-head. It is observed that time to fill the storage tanks under both normal and pressure-deficient conditions for non-zero minimum pressure head is higher. All the simulations were performed using graphical user interface of EPANET 2. Thus, the proposed approach can be used readily by researchers and practitioners without requiring any additional computational codes development.

[1]  Paul Jowitt,et al.  Solution for Water Distribution Systems under Pressure-Deficient Conditions , 2006 .

[2]  Rajesh Gupta,et al.  Noniterative Application of EPANET for Pressure Dependent Modelling Of Water Distribution Systems , 2015, Water Resources Management.

[3]  Ram Kailash Prasad,et al.  Extended Period Simulation of Pressure-Deficient Networks Using Pressure Reducing Valves , 2014, Water Resources Management.

[4]  Ram Kailash Prasad,et al.  Simulation of Water Distribution Network under Pressure-Deficient Condition , 2014, Water Resources Management.

[5]  Tiku T. Tanyimboh,et al.  Dynamic Pressure-Dependent Simulation of Water Distribution Networks Considering Volume-Driven Demands Based on Noniterative Application of EPANET 2 , 2020 .

[6]  S. Mohan,et al.  Extended Period Simulation for Pressure-Deficient Water Distribution Network , 2012 .

[7]  Massoud Tabesh,et al.  A comparative study between the modified and available demand driven based models for head driven analysis of water distribution networks , 2014 .

[8]  Jacob Chandapillai,et al.  Design of Water Distribution Network for Equitable Supply , 2011, Water Resources Management.

[9]  William H. McAnally,et al.  Nested Hydrodynamic Modeling of a Coastal River Applying Dynamic-Coupling , 2014, Water Resources Management.

[10]  Thomas M. Walski,et al.  EFFICIENT PRESSURE DEPENDENT DEMAND MODEL FOR LARGE WATER DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM ANALYSIS , 2008 .

[11]  Orazio Giustolisi,et al.  Demand Components in Water Distribution Network Analysis , 2012 .

[12]  Lindell Ormsbee,et al.  Leakage as Pressure-Driven Demand in Design of Water Distribution Networks , 2016 .

[13]  Pramod R. Bhave,et al.  Node Flow Analysis Distribution Systems , 1981 .

[14]  Nirman Bhawan,et al.  MINISTRY OF URBAN DEVELOPMENT GOVERNMENT OF INDIA , 2015 .

[15]  Nikolai B. Gorev,et al.  Noniterative Implementation of Pressure-Dependent Demands Using the Hydraulic Analysis Engine of EPANET 2 , 2013, Water Resources Management.

[16]  Tiku T. Tanyimboh,et al.  Pressure-Dependent EPANET Extension , 2012, Water Resources Management.

[17]  U. Shamir,et al.  Design of optimal water distribution systems , 1977 .

[18]  U. Shamir,et al.  Design of optimal water distribution systems , 1977 .

[19]  Pramod R. Bhave,et al.  Comparison of Methods for Predicting Deficient-Network Performance , 1996 .

[20]  Pramod R. Bhave,et al.  Optimal Design of Level 1 Redundant Water Distribution Networks Considering Nodal Storage , 2007 .

[21]  T. R. Neelakantan,et al.  Improved complementary reservoir solution to evaluate nodal outflow under pressure-deficient conditions , 2017 .