Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement

Three dimensional (3D) stereolithographic printing can be used to convert clinical imaging data into life size, patient-specific physical models replicating the anatomic characteristics of calcific aortic valve disease. Creation of these full-scale models requires a combination of several technologies including high spatial resolution electrocardiogram-gated computed tomography, computer-aided design software, and fused multimaterial 3D printing. By selecting specific print material properties, it is possible to replicate the geometry of the entire aortic root complex combining regions of compliant tissue with regions of hard and immobile “calcified” tissue. 3D printing of calcific aortic valve disease has been taken another step forward in replicating not only the anatomy but also the basic functional characteristics of these valves: stenosis and regurgitation. These functional models allow for accurate evaluation of diseased patient-specific physiology and represent a potentially very powerful new tool. Development of functional patient-specific models has several potential applications in medicine: training of medical teams for transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) procedures; investigating the flow dependency of aortic stenosis or regurgitation using flow phantoms; determining the accuracy and limitations of noninvasive imaging methods to quantify valve dysfunction; and evaluating patient-specific procedural adjustments a priori that may influence acute procedural success during catheter-based valve intervention. Functional 3D-printed models and accurate replication of patient-specific hemodynamics can create an environment for testing percutaneous valve devices and optimization of their design. Current effort is focused on applying these models to both predict and prevent paravalvular regurgitation.

[1]  S. Little,et al.  Paravalvular Regurgitation After TAVR: A Doppler Dilemma. , 2015, JACC. Cardiovascular imaging.

[2]  S. Pocock,et al.  Transcatheter aortic-valve implantation for aortic stenosis in patients who cannot undergo surgery. , 2010, The New England journal of medicine.

[3]  S. Achenbach,et al.  SCCT expert consensus document on computed tomography imaging before transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI)/transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). , 2012, Journal of cardiovascular computed tomography.

[4]  M. Mack,et al.  5-year outcomes of transcatheter aortic valve replacement or surgical aortic valve replacement for high surgical risk patients with aortic stenosis (PARTNER 1): a randomised controlled trial , 2015, The Lancet.

[5]  J. Gardin,et al.  Burden of valvular heart diseases: a population-based study , 2006, The Lancet.

[6]  L. W. Andersen,et al.  Transcatheter Versus Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement in Patients With Severe Aortic Valve Stenosis: 1-Year Results From the All-Comers NOTION Randomized Clinical Trial. , 2015, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[7]  Matthew S. Jackson,et al.  Functional 3D printed patient-specific modeling of severe aortic stenosis. , 2014, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[8]  K. J. Grande-Allen,et al.  Calcific Aortic Valve Disease : Not Simply a Degenerative Process A Review and Agenda for Research from the National Heart and Lung and Blood Institute Aortic Stenosis Working Group , 2012 .

[9]  M. Leon,et al.  Percutaneous Transcatheter Implantation of an Aortic Valve Prosthesis for Calcific Aortic Stenosis First Human Case Description , 2002 .

[10]  Mark J Monaghan,et al.  Recommendations for comprehensive intraprocedural echocardiographic imaging during TAVR. , 2015, JACC. Cardiovascular imaging.

[11]  Wei Sun,et al.  Significant differences in the material properties between aged human and porcine aortic tissues. , 2011, European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery.

[12]  B. Mosadegh,et al.  Cardiac 3D Printing and its Future Directions. , 2017, JACC. Cardiovascular imaging.

[13]  Matthew S. Jackson,et al.  Replicating Patient-Specific Severe Aortic Valve Stenosis With Functional 3D Modeling , 2015, Circulation. Cardiovascular imaging.

[14]  Robert A Levine,et al.  Effect of three-dimensional valve shape on the hemodynamics of aortic stenosis: three-dimensional echocardiographic stereolithography and patient studies. , 2002, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[15]  Sanjay Kaul,et al.  2012 ACCF/AATS/SCAI/STS expert consensus document on transcatheter aortic valve replacement. , 2012, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[16]  Maurice Buchbinder,et al.  Transcatheter aortic-valve replacement with a self-expanding prosthesis. , 2014, The New England journal of medicine.

[17]  Boyce E. Griffith,et al.  Emerging Trends in Heart Valve Engineering: Part II. Novel and Standard Technologies for Aortic Valve Replacement , 2014, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[18]  Stuart J Pocock,et al.  Transcatheter versus surgical aortic-valve replacement in high-risk patients. , 2011, The New England journal of medicine.

[19]  Philippe Ravaud,et al.  A prospective survey of patients with valvular heart disease in Europe: The Euro Heart Survey on Valvular Heart Disease. , 2003, European heart journal.

[20]  Steffen Hofmann,et al.  Initial German experience with transapical implantation of a second-generation transcatheter heart valve for the treatment of aortic regurgitation. , 2014, JACC. Cardiovascular interventions.

[21]  Hongyan Qiao,et al.  2-Year Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Surgical or Self-Expanding Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement. , 2015, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[22]  Stefan Weber,et al.  Three-dimensional printing of models for preoperative planning and simulation of transcatheter valve replacement. , 2012, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[23]  Thoralf M Sundt,et al.  2014 AHA/ACC Guideline for the Management of Patients With Valvular Heart Disease: executive summary: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. , 2014, Circulation.

[24]  Stephen Rudin,et al.  Challenges and limitations of patient-specific vascular phantom fabrication using 3D Polyjet printing , 2014, Medical Imaging.

[25]  M. Mack,et al.  The future of transcatheter aortic valve implantation. , 2016, European heart journal.

[26]  Danial Shahmirzadi,et al.  3D-Printed Tissue-Mimicking Phantoms for Medical Imaging and Computational Validation Applications. , 2014, 3D printing and additive manufacturing.

[27]  Mao-Jiun J. Wang,et al.  Controlling the mechanical behavior of dual-material 3D printed meta-materials for patient-specific tissue-mimicking phantoms , 2016 .

[28]  Kanwal M. Farooqi,et al.  Echocardiography and three-dimensional printing: sound ideas to touch a heart. , 2015, Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography : official publication of the American Society of Echocardiography.