Land use and transit ridership connections: Implications for state-level planning agencies

Abstract In this article we attempt to establish the connections between transit ridership and land use and socio-economic variables, and project future ridership under different scenarios. We subdivided the state of Maryland, USA into 1151 Statewide Modeling Zones and developed a set of variables for the base year (2000). We estimated multiple models of transit ridership – using ordinary least squares and spatial error modeling approaches – for the entire state. We also test for the determinants of ridership within urban, suburban and rural typologies. We find that land use type, transit accessibility, income, and density are strongly significant and robust predictors of transit ridership for the statewide and urban areas datasets. We also find that the determinants and their coefficients vary across urban, suburban and rural areas. Next we used a suite of econometric, land use and other models to generate two sets of future transit ridership scenarios under conditions of – (a) business as usual and (b) high energy price – for a 30-year horizon. We analyze these scenarios to demonstrate the value of our approach for state-level decision-making.

[1]  Ming Zhang,et al.  The Second Generation of the California Urban Futures Model. Part 2: Specification and Calibration Results of the Land-Use Change Submodel , 1998 .

[2]  Thomas E Lisco.  VALUE OF COMMUTERS TRAVEL TIME - A STUDY IN URBAN TRANSPORTATION , 1968 .

[3]  D. Skinner,et al.  The impact of fare and gasoline price changes on monthly transit ridership: Empirical evidence from seven U.S. transit authorities , 1984 .

[4]  Reid Ewing,et al.  Transit-Oriented Development in the Sun Belt , 1996 .

[5]  Jen-Jia Lin,et al.  A TOD planning model to review the regulation of allowable development densities around subway stations , 2006 .

[6]  J. Levine,et al.  A Choice-Based Rationale for Land Use and Transportation Alternatives , 2005 .

[7]  M. Kuby,et al.  Factors influencing light-rail station boardings in the United States , 2004 .

[8]  P. Haas,et al.  Understanding Transit Ridership Growth: Case Studies of Successful Transit Systems in the 1990s , 2003 .

[9]  Marlon G. Boarnet,et al.  Land Use, Urban Design, and Nonwork Travel: Reproducing Other Urban Areas’ Empirical Test Results in Portland, Oregon , 2000 .

[10]  John Pucher.  TRANSIT FINANCING TRENDS IN LARGE U.S. METROPOLITAN AREAS: 1973-1978 , 1980 .

[11]  Lawrence R. Hirsch,et al.  Effects of Fare Incentives on New York City Transit Ridership , 2000 .

[12]  Tadashi Fujii,et al.  THE CHANGING METROPOLITAN STRUCTURE OF ATLANTA, GEORGIA: LOCATIONS OF FUNCTIONS AND REGIONAL STRUCTURE IN A MULTINUCLEATED URBAN AREA , 1995 .

[13]  Arnab Chakraborty,et al.  Enhancing the role of participatory scenario planning processes: Lessons from Reality Check exercises , 2011 .

[14]  R. Cervero,et al.  TRAVEL DEMAND AND THE 3DS: DENSITY, DIVERSITY, AND DESIGN , 1997 .

[15]  H. Kohn.  Factors affecting urban transit ridership , 2000 .

[16]  A. Moudon,et al.  Effects of Site Design on Pedestrian Travel in Mixed-Use, Medium-Density Environments , 1997 .

[17]  J. Landis.  IMAGINING LAND USE FUTURES: APPLYING THE CALIFORNIA URBAN FUTURES MODEL , 1995 .

[18]  B. Taylor,et al.  RECONSIDERING SOCIAL EQUITY IN PUBLIC TRANSIT , 1999 .

[19]  B. Taylor,et al.  The Factors Influencing Transit Ridership: A Review and Analysis of the Ridership Literature , 2003 .

[20]  Susan Shaheen,et al.  Public Transit Training: A Mechanism to Increase Ridership among Older Adults , 2008 .

[21]  John F. Kain,et al.  Secrets of success: assessing the large increases in transit ridership achieved by Houston and San Diego transit providers , 1999 .

[22]  Mohamed Abdel-Aty,et al.  Using ordered probit modeling to study the effect of ATIS on transit ridership , 2001 .

[23]  Daniel A. Badoe,et al.  Transportation–land-use interaction: empirical findings in North America, and their implications for modeling , 2000 .

[24]  R. Kitamura,et al.  A micro-analysis of land use and travel in five neighborhoods in the San Francisco Bay Area , 1997 .

[25]  G R Fauth,et al.  DOWNTOWN AUTO RESTRAINT POLICIES: COSTS AND BENEFITS FOR BOSTON , 1980 .

[26]  Gregory L. Thompson,et al.  Explaining Variation in Transit Ridership in U.S. Metropolitan Areas Between 1990 and 2000: Multivariate Analysis , 2006 .

[27]  J. Levine,et al.  The Market for Transportation-Land Use Integration: Do Developers Want Smarter Growth than Regulations Allow? , 2004 .

[28]  Snehamay Khasnabis,et al.  Optimal resource allocation among transit agencies for fleet management , 2010 .

[29]  Sabyasachee Mishra,et al.  A functional integrated land use-transportation model for analyzing transportation impacts in the Maryland-Washington, DC Region , 2011 .

[30]  B. Taylor,et al.  Nature and/or nurture? Analyzing the determinants of transit ridership across US urbanized areas , 2008 .

[31]  Daniel Schunk,et al.  Spatial Dynamic Modeling and Urban Land Use Transformation , 2003 .

[32]  R. Cervero.  Transit-Oriented Development's Ridership Bonus: A Product of Self-Selection and Public Policies , 2006 .

[33]  Alan J Horowitz.  Simplifications for single-route transit-ridership forecasting models , 1984 .

[34]  T. Litman.  Transit Price Elasticities and Cross-Elasticities , 2004 .

[35]  Liping Wang,et al.  Temporal Geographic Information System and Its Application to Transportation , 1997 .

[36]  J. Landis.  The California Urban Futures Model: A New Generation of Metropolitan Simulation Models , 1994 .

[37]  Ram M. Pendyala,et al.  Development of Time-of-Day–Based Transit Accessibility Analysis Tool , 2002 .

[38]  Robert Cervero,et al.  TRANSIT-BASED HOUSING IN CALIFORNIA: EVIDENCE ON RIDERSHIP IMPACTS , 1994 .

[39]  N. Kaza,et al.  Robust Plans and Contingent Plans , 2011 .

[40]  D H Pickrell,et al.  URBAN RAIL TRANSIT PROJECTS: FORECAST VERSUS ACTUAL RIDERSHIP AND COSTS. FINAL REPORT , 1989 .

[41]  Eric J. Miller,et al.  Integrated Urban Models for Simulation of Transit and Land-Use Policies , 1998 .

[42]  F. Frisken.  The Contributions of Metropolitan Government to the Success of Toronto's Public Transit System , 1991 .

[43]  Arnab Chakraborty,et al.  Scenario Planning for Effective Regional Governance: Promises and Limitations , 2010 .

[44]  K. Krizek.  Operationalizing Neighborhood Accessibility for Land Use-Travel Behavior Research and Regional Modeling , 2003 .

[45]  K. Powell,et al.  The Effectiveness of Urban Design and Land Use and Transport Policies and Practices to Increase Physical Activity: A Systematic Review. , 2006, Journal of physical activity & health.

[46]  P. Newman,et al.  The land use—transport connection: An overview , 1996 .

[47]  R. Cervero,et al.  TWENTY YEARS OF THE BAY AREA RAPID TRANSIT SYSTEM: LAND USE AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACTS , 1997 .

[48]  Brian M Deal,et al.  Ecological urban dynamics: the convergence of spatial modelling and sustainability , 2001 .

[49]  Jian Lu,et al.  Use of Geographic Information System for Analysis of Transit Pedestrian Access , 1997 .

[50]  Corinne Mulley,et al.  The short-term land value impacts of urban rail transit: Quantitative evidence from Sunderland, UK , 2007 .

[51]  Kara M. Kockelman,et al.  Travel Behavior as Function of Accessibility, Land Use Mixing, and Land Use Balance: Evidence from San Francisco Bay Area , 1997 .

[52]  Hiroyuki Iseki,et al.  Analyzing the Determinants of Transit Ridership Using a Two-Stage Least Squares Regression on a National Sample of Urbanized Areas , 2003 .

[53]  Marlon G. Boarnet,et al.  The influence of land use on travel behavior: specification and estimation strategies , 2001 .

[54]  Gordon W. Davies.  The Effect of a Subway on the Spatial Distribution of Population , 1976 .

[55]  Jeffery J. Smith,et al.  Financing Transit Systems through Value Capture: An Annotated Bibliography , 2006 .

[56]  R. Cervero.  MIXED LAND-USES AND COMMUTING: EVIDENCE FROM THE AMERICAN HOUSING SURVEY , 1996 .

[57]  Alan T. Murray,et al.  Accessibility tradeoffs in public transit planning , 2003, J. Geogr. Syst..

[58]  Edward A Beimborn,et al.  Accessibility, Connectivity, and Captivity: Impacts on Transit Choice , 2003 .

[59]  Alan T. Murray,et al.  Optimizing Public Transit Quality and System Access: The Multiple-Route, Maximal Covering/Shortest-Path Problem , 2005 .

[60]  Xuehao Chu,et al.  Density and Captivity in Public Transit Success: Observations from the 1995 Nationwide Personal Transportation Study , 2000 .

[61]  Alan T. Murray.  A Coverage Model for Improving Public Transit System Accessibility and Expanding Access , 2003, Ann. Oper. Res..

[62]  P. E. Snehamay Khasnabis Ph.D.,et al.  A Single-Stage Mixed Integer Programming Model for Transit Fleet Resource Allocation , 2007 .

[63]  G. Ingram.  Patterns of Metropolitan Development: What Have We Learned? , 1997 .

[64]  Michael Kyte,et al.  A TIME-SERIES ANALYSIS OF PUBLIC TRANSIT RIDERSHIP IN PORTLAND, OREGON, 1971-1982 , 1988 .

[65]  M. Boarnet,et al.  Can Land Use Policy Really Affect Travel Behavior? A Study of the Link between Non-Work Travel and Land Use Characteristics , 1996 .

[66]  Shing Chung Josh Wong,et al.  The advantages of a high density, mixed land use, linear urban development , 1997 .

[67]  Reid Ewing,et al.  Travel and the Built Environment: A Synthesis , 2001 .

[68]  Evelyn Blumenberg,et al.  Job Access, Commute and Travel Burden among Welfare Recipients , 1997 .

[69]  R. Ewing.  Characteristics, Causes, and Effects of Sprawl: A Literature Review , 2008 .

[70]  P. Waddell.  UrbanSim: Modeling Urban Development for Land Use, Transportation, and Environmental Planning , 2002 .

[71]  Snehamay Khasnabis,et al.  Single-Stage Integer Programming Model for Long-Term Transit Fleet Resource Allocation , 2010 .

[72]  Moshe Ben-Akiva,et al.  Comparing ridership attraction of rail and bus , 2002 .