An Approach for Cycle-Robust Platform Design

Product platforms are frequently applied in industry for designing product families. The product platform builds the basis for the derivation of the offered variants. As the platforms are characterized by a long life cycle, changes induced by internal and external influences will occur to the product family during the utilization phase. This results in new variants which often cause a lot of effort for implementation. To avoid these time-consuming and costly efforts, the dynamic changes and variations during the life cycle of the platform must be anticipated and considered in the planning of the platform. The platform structure can be planned and designed according to the expected changes and decrease their later change impact. The revisions of the platform can be scheduled in accordance to the changing context. This paper presents an approach to anticipate the influences which cause changes to the platform structure and consider them in the design of the platform and module structure. Thereby, occurring changes during the life cycle of the platform have lower impact and can be implemented in fast and cost-efficient way.

[1]  Jürgen Gausemeier,et al.  Zukunftsorientierte Unternehmensgestaltung , 2014 .

[2]  Ron Sanchez,et al.  Creating Modular Platforms for Strategic Flexibility , 2010 .

[3]  Udo Lindemann,et al.  Simultaneous Modularization and Platform Identification of Product Family Variants , 2010 .

[4]  Olivier L. de Weck,et al.  4.3.2 Platform identification using Design Structure Matrices , 2006 .

[5]  Udo Lindemann,et al.  Structural Complexity Management: An Approach for the Field of Product Design , 2008 .

[6]  Udo Lindemann,et al.  Managing Cycles in Development Processes - Analysis and Classification of External Context Factors , 2009 .

[7]  Kosuke Ishii,et al.  Design for variety: developing standardized and modularized product platform architectures , 2002 .

[8]  K. Ulrich,et al.  Planning for Product Platforms , 1998 .

[9]  Katerina Alexiou,et al.  Towards an anticipatory view of design , 2007 .

[10]  Gunnar Erixon,et al.  Controlling Design Variants: Modular Product Platforms , 1999 .

[11]  Wolfgang Bauer,et al.  Future-Proof Interfaces: Systematic Identification and Analysis , 2011 .

[12]  Udo Lindemann,et al.  Towards a Lifecycle-oriented planning of a platform portfolio , 2011, 2011 IEEE International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management.

[13]  Karl T. Ulrich,et al.  The role of product architecture in the manufacturing firm , 2011 .

[14]  Olivier de Weck,et al.  Platform identification using Design Structure Matrices , 2005 .

[15]  Adam M. Ross,et al.  Anticipatory capacity: Leveraging model-based approaches to design systems for dynamic futures , 2009, 2009 International Conference on Model-Based Systems Engineering.

[16]  Marc H. Meyer,et al.  The Power of Product Platforms , 1997 .

[17]  Kristin L. Wood,et al.  A heuristic method for identifying modules for product architectures , 2000 .

[18]  Steven D. Eppinger,et al.  Integration analysis of product decompositions , 1994 .

[19]  Nile W. Hatch,et al.  Design Rules, Volume 1: The Power of Modularity , 2001 .