Representations of numerical and non-numerical magnitude both contribute to mathematical competence in children.

A growing body of evidence suggests that non-symbolic representations of number, which humans share with nonhuman animals, are functionally related to uniquely human mathematical thought. Other research suggesting that numerical and non-numerical magnitudes not only share analog format but also form part of a general magnitude system raises questions about whether the non-symbolic basis of mathematical thinking is unique to numerical magnitude. Here we examined this issue in 5- and 6-year-old children using comparison tasks of non-symbolic number arrays and cumulative area as well as standardized tests of math competence. One set of findings revealed that scores on both magnitude comparison tasks were modulated by ratio, consistent with shared analog format. Moreover, scores on these tasks were moderately correlated, suggesting overlap in the precision of numerical and non-numerical magnitudes, as expected under a general magnitude system. Another set of findings revealed that the precision of both types of magnitude contributed shared and unique variance to the same math measures (e.g. calculation and geometry), after accounting for age and verbal competence. These findings argue against an exclusive role for non-symbolic number in supporting early mathematical understanding. Moreover, they suggest that mathematical understanding may be rooted in a general system of magnitude representation that is not specific to numerical magnitude but that also encompasses non-numerical magnitude.

[1]  Stella F. Lourenco,et al.  Individual differences in children's approximations of area correlate with competence in basic geometry , 2015 .

[2]  Ariel Starr,et al.  Developmental Continuity in the Link Between Sensitivity to Numerosity and Physical Size , 2015, J. Numer. Cogn..

[3]  S. Dumoulin,et al.  Topographic representations of object size and relationships with numerosity reveal generalized quantity processing in human parietal cortex , 2015, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[4]  Melissa E. Libertus,et al.  Inhibitory control may not explain the link between approximation and math abilities in kindergarteners from middle class families , 2015, Front. Psychol..

[5]  Melissa E. Libertus,et al.  Understanding the mapping between numerical approximation and number words: evidence from Williams syndrome and typical development. , 2014, Developmental science.

[6]  Gavin R. Price,et al.  Numerical predictors of arithmetic success in grades 1-6. , 2014, Developmental science.

[7]  Lisa K Fazio,et al.  Relations of different types of numerical magnitude representations to each other and to mathematics achievement. , 2014, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[8]  Yaoran Li,et al.  Acuity of the approximate number system and preschoolers' quantitative development. , 2014, Developmental science.

[9]  E. Spelke,et al.  Brief non-symbolic, approximate number practice enhances subsequent exact symbolic arithmetic in children , 2014, Cognition.

[10]  J. Leybaert,et al.  Symbolic Number Abilities Predict Later Approximate Number System Acuity in Preschool Children , 2014, PloS one.

[11]  Emmy Defever,et al.  The Approximate Number System is not Predictive for Symbolic Number Processing in Kindergarteners , 2014, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[12]  Charles Hulme,et al.  Children’s Arithmetic Development , 2014, Psychological science.

[13]  Melissa E. Libertus,et al.  Numerical approximation abilities correlate with and predict informal but not formal mathematics abilities. , 2013, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[14]  Ariel Starr,et al.  Number sense in infancy predicts mathematical abilities in childhood , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[15]  R. Cohen Kadosh,et al.  Transfer of Cognitive Training across Magnitude Dimensions Achieved with Concurrent Brain Stimulation of the Parietal Lobe , 2013, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[16]  Steven C. Dakin,et al.  Sensitivity to numerosity is not a unique visuospatial psychophysical predictor of mathematical ability , 2013, Vision Research.

[17]  Elizabeth M Brannon,et al.  Training the Approximate Number System Improves Math Proficiency , 2013, Psychological science.

[18]  C. Agrillo,et al.  Individual differences in non-symbolic numerical abilities predict mathematical achievements but contradict ATOM , 2013, Behavioral and Brain Functions.

[19]  M. Cappelletti,et al.  Age does not count: resilience of quantity processing in healthy ageing , 2013, Front. Psychol..

[20]  N. Marlow,et al.  Individual Differences in Inhibitory Control, Not Non-Verbal Number Acuity, Correlate with Mathematics Achievement , 2013, PloS one.

[21]  Daniel Ansari,et al.  How do symbolic and non-symbolic numerical magnitude processing skills relate to individual differences in children's mathematical skills? A review of evidence from brain and behavior , 2013, Trends in Neuroscience and Education.

[22]  Justin Halberda,et al.  Links Between the Intuitive Sense of Number and Formal Mathematics Ability. , 2013, Child development perspectives.

[23]  Justin Halberda,et al.  Is Approximate Number Precision a Stable Predictor of Math Ability? , 2013, Learning and individual differences.

[24]  Pierre Pica,et al.  Education Enhances the Acuity of the Nonverbal Approximate Number System , 2013, Psychological science.

[25]  Stella F. Lourenco,et al.  The approximate number system and its relation to early math achievement: evidence from the preschool years. , 2013, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[26]  Jacqueline Leybaert,et al.  Does math education modify the approximate number system? A comparison of schooled and unschooled adults , 2013, Trends in Neuroscience and Education.

[27]  Melissa E. Libertus,et al.  Intuitive sense of number correlates with math scores on college-entrance examination. , 2012, Acta psychologica.

[28]  Stella F. Lourenco,et al.  Nonsymbolic number and cumulative area representations contribute shared and unique variance to symbolic math competence , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[29]  Nicholas K DeWind,et al.  Malleability of the approximate number system: effects of feedback and training , 2012, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[30]  Chuansheng Chen,et al.  Cognitive correlates of performance in advanced mathematics. , 2012, The British journal of educational psychology.

[31]  Melissa E. Libertus,et al.  Preschool acuity of the approximate number system correlates with school math ability. , 2011, Developmental science.

[32]  Stella F. Lourenco,et al.  Early sex differences in weighting geometric cues. , 2011, Developmental science.

[33]  D. Geary.  Cognitive predictors of achievement growth in mathematics: a 5-year longitudinal study. , 2011, Developmental psychology.

[34]  L. Feigenson,et al.  Preschoolers' Precision of the Approximate Number System Predicts Later School Mathematics Performance , 2011, PloS one.

[35]  Romain Martin,et al.  Relationships between number and space processing in adults with and without dyscalculia. , 2011, Acta psychologica.

[36]  Marinella Cappelletti,et al.  Numbers and time doubly dissociate , 2011, Neuropsychologia.

[37]  Susan C. Johnson,et al.  An association between understanding cardinality and analog magnitude representations in preschoolers , 2011, Cognition.

[38]  B. Butterworth.  Foundational numerical capacities and the origins of dyscalculia , 2010, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[39]  J. LeFevre,et al.  Pathways to mathematics: longitudinal predictors of performance. , 2010, Child development.

[40]  S. Carey,et al.  The long and the short of it: On the nature and origin of functional overlap between representations of space and time , 2010, Cognition.

[41]  Andrea Facoetti,et al.  Developmental trajectory of number acuity reveals a severe impairment in developmental dyscalculia , 2010, Cognition.

[42]  Elizabeth S. Spelke,et al.  Non-symbolic arithmetic abilities and mathematics achievement in the first year of formal schooling , 2010, Cognition.

[43]  Stella F. Lourenco,et al.  General Magnitude Representation in Human Infants , 2010, Psychological science.

[44]  E. Spelke,et al.  Number-Space Mapping in Human Infants , 2010, Psychological science.

[45]  L. Verschaffel,et al.  The predictive value of numerical magnitude comparison for individual differences in mathematics achievement. , 2009, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[46]  V. Walsh,et al.  The parietal cortex and the representation of time, space, number and other magnitudes , 2009, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[47]  Valérie Dormal,et al.  Common and Specific Contributions of the Intraparietal Sulci to Numerosity and Length Processing , 2009, NeuroImage.

[48]  S. Dehaene,et al.  Representation of number in the brain. , 2009, Annual review of neuroscience.

[49]  Andreas Nieder,et al.  Contributions of primate prefrontal and posterior parietal cortices to length and numerosity representation. , 2009, Journal of neurophysiology.

[50]  Daniel Ansari,et al.  Mapping numerical magnitudes onto symbols: the numerical distance effect and individual differences in children's mathematics achievement. , 2009, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[51]  S. Dehaene.  Origins of Mathematical Intuitions , 2009, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[52]  Elizabeth M. Brannon,et al.  Beyond the number domain , 2009, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[53]  Justin Halberda,et al.  Individual differences in non-verbal number acuity correlate with maths achievement , 2008, Nature.

[54]  L. Feigenson,et al.  Developmental change in the acuity of the "Number Sense": The Approximate Number System in 3-, 4-, 5-, and 6-year-olds and adults. , 2008, Developmental psychology.

[55]  D. Ansari.  Effects of development and enculturation on number representation in the brain , 2008, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[56]  Roi Cohen Kadosh,et al.  Are numbers special? An overview of chronometric, neuroimaging, developmental and comparative studies of magnitude representation , 2008, Progress in Neurobiology.

[57]  S. Dehaene,et al.  Cultural Recycling of Cortical Maps , 2007, Neuron.

[58]  Andreas Nieder,et al.  Neuronal population coding of continuous and discrete quantity in the primate posterior parietal cortex , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[59]  Sheng He,et al.  Larger stimuli are judged to last longer. , 2007, Journal of vision.

[60]  T. Ahonen,et al.  Cognitive predictors of single-digit and procedural calculation skills and their covariation with reading skill. , 2007, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[61]  Rochel Gelman,et al.  Sometimes area counts more than number , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[62]  Brian Butterworth,et al.  Discrete and analogue quantity processing in the parietal lobe: a functional MRI study. , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[63]  A. Nieder.  Counting on neurons: the neurobiology of numerical competence , 2005, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[64]  Kerry Lee,et al.  Working memory and literacy as predictors of performance on algebraic word problems. , 2004, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[65]  Philippe Pinel,et al.  Distributed and Overlapping Cerebral Representations of Number, Size, and Luminance during Comparative Judgments , 2004, Neuron.

[66]  Vincent Walsh.  A theory of magnitude: common cortical metrics of time, space and quantity , 2003, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[67]  Susan Carey,et al.  Cognitive Foundations of Arithmetic: Evolution and Ontogenisis , 2001 .

[68]  Elizabeth S Spelke,et al.  Language and number: a bilingual training study , 2001, Cognition.

[69]  C. Gallistel,et al.  Non-verbal numerical cognition: from reals to integers , 2000, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[70]  J. Huttenlocher,et al.  Early sex differences in spatial skill. , 1999, Developmental psychology.

[71]  S. Dehaene,et al.  Abstract representations of numbers in the animal and human brain , 1998, Trends in Neurosciences.

[72]  Robert S. Siegler,et al.  Cognitive Variability: A Key to Understanding Cognitive Development , 1994 .

[73]  C. Gallistel,et al.  Preverbal and verbal counting and computation , 1992, Cognition.

[74]  Stella F. Lourenco.  On the Relation between Numerical and Non-Numerical Magnitudes: Evidence for a General Magnitude System , 2015 .

[75]  Matthew Inglis,et al.  Indexing the approximate number system. , 2014, Acta psychologica.

[76]  Nicole M. McNeil,et al.  ANS acuity and mathematics ability in preschoolers from low-income homes: contributions of inhibitory control. , 2013, Developmental science.

[77]  Melissa E. Libertus,et al.  Developmental Psychology Developmental Change in the Acuity of Approximate Number and Area Representations , 2012 .

[78]  E. Spelke,et al.  Language and Conceptual Development series Core systems of number , 2004 .

[79]  G. Orban,et al.  Parietal Representation of Symbolic and Nonsymbolic Magnitude , 2003, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[80]  David C. Geary,et al.  Reflections of evolution and culture in children's cognition: Implications for mathematical development and instruction. , 1995 .

[81]  Z. Pylyshyn,et al.  Why are small and large numbers enumerated differently? A limited-capacity preattentive stage in vision. , 1994, Psychological review.