Well Tops Guided Prediction of Reservoir Properties using Modular Neural Network Concept A Case Study from Western Onshore, India

Abstract This paper proposes a complete framework consisting pre-processing, modeling, and post-processing stages to carry out well tops guided prediction of a reservoir property (sand fraction) from three seismic attributes (seismic impedance, instantaneous amplitude, and instantaneous frequency) using the concept of modular artificial neural network (MANN). The dataset used in this study, comprising three seismic attributes and well log data from eight wells, is acquired from a western onshore hydrocarbon field of India. Firstly, the acquired dataset is integrated and normalized. Then, well log analysis and segmentation of the total depth range into three different units (zones) separated by well tops are carried out. Secondly, three different networks are trained corresponding to three different zones using combined dataset of seven wells and then trained networks are validated using the remaining test well. The target property of the test well is predicted using three different tuned networks corresponding to three zones; and then the estimated values obtained from three different networks are concatenated to represent the predicted log along the complete depth range of the testing well. The application of multiple simpler networks instead of a single one improves the prediction accuracy in terms of performance evaluators – correlation coefficient, root mean square error, absolute error mean and program execution time. Then, volumetric prediction of reservoir properties is carried out using calibrated network parameters. This stage is followed by post-processing to improve visualization. Thus, a complete framework, which includes pre-processing, model building and validation, volumetric prediction, and post-processing, is designed for successful mapping between seismic attributes and a reservoir characteristic. The proposed framework outperformed a single artificial neural network in terms of reduced prediction error, program execution time and improved correlation coefficient as a result of application of the MANN concept.

[1]  Mohamed S. Kamel,et al.  Modular neural networks: a survey. , 1999, International journal of neural systems.

[2]  Jonathan F. Donges,et al.  Visibility graph analysis of geophysical time series: Potentials and possible pitfalls , 2012, Acta Geophysica.

[3]  Miguel Bosch,et al.  Inversion of traveltime data under a statistical model for seismic velocities and layer interfaces , 2005 .

[4]  Halit Eren,et al.  Modular artificial neural network for prediction of petrophysical properties from well log data , 1996, Quality Measurement: The Indispensable Bridge between Theory and Reality (No Measurements? No Science! Joint Conference - 1996: IEEE Instrumentation and Measurement Technology Conference and IMEKO Tec.

[5]  Allan Pinkus,et al.  Multilayer Feedforward Networks with a Non-Polynomial Activation Function Can Approximate Any Function , 1991, Neural Networks.

[6]  Martin J. Blunt,et al.  Development of artificial neural network models for predicting water saturation and fluid distribution , 2009 .

[7]  Yi Ding,et al.  A modular neural network architecture with concept , 2014, Neurocomputing.

[8]  Masoud Nikravesh,et al.  Soft computing-based computational intelligent for reservoir characterization , 2004, Expert Syst. Appl..

[9]  Patricia Melin,et al.  Optimization of modular granular neural networks using hierarchical genetic algorithms for human recognition using the ear biometric measure , 2014, Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell..

[10]  Kurt Hornik,et al.  Multilayer feedforward networks are universal approximators , 1989, Neural Networks.

[11]  T. Mukerji,et al.  Seismic inversion for reservoir properties combining statistical rock physics and geostatistics: A review , 2010 .

[12]  Masami Ito,et al.  Task decomposition and module combination based on class relations: a modular neural network for pattern classification , 1999, IEEE Trans. Neural Networks.

[13]  Philippe Marie Doyen,et al.  Porosity from seismic data: A geostatistical approach , 1988 .

[14]  Oscar Castillo,et al.  Optimization of modular granular neural networks using a hierarchical genetic algorithm based on the database complexity applied to human recognition , 2015, Inf. Sci..

[15]  Aurobinda Routray,et al.  Assessment of Similarity Between Well Logs Using Synchronization Measures , 2014, IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters.

[16]  C.E. Shannon,et al.  Communication in the Presence of Noise , 1949, Proceedings of the IRE.

[17]  Mabkhout M. Al-Dousari,et al.  An artificial neural network model for predicting the recovery performance of surfactant polymer floods , 2013 .

[18]  Pejman Tahmasebi,et al.  Comparative evaluation of back-propagation neural network learning algorithms and empirical correlations for prediction of oil PVT properties in Iran oilfields , 2011 .

[19]  B. L. Kalman,et al.  Why tanh: choosing a sigmoidal function , 1992, [Proceedings 1992] IJCNN International Joint Conference on Neural Networks.

[20]  Masoud Nikravesh,et al.  Past, present and future intelligent reservoir characterization trends , 2001 .

[21]  Sadegh Karimpouli,et al.  A new approach to improve neural networks' algorithm in permeability prediction of petroleum reservoirs using supervised committee machine neural network (SCMNN) , 2010 .

[22]  Abbas Majdi,et al.  Identification of well logs with significant impact on prediction of oil and gas reservoirs permeability using statistical analysis of RSE values , 2010 .

[23]  Peyman Abbaszadeh,et al.  A new hybrid artificial neural networks for rainfall-runoff process modeling , 2013, Neurocomputing.

[24]  Aurobinda Routray,et al.  Detecting Stratigraphic Discontinuities using Wavelet and S- Transform Analysis of Well Log Data , 2012 .

[25]  J. Nazuno Haykin, Simon. Neural networks: A comprehensive foundation, Prentice Hall, Inc. Segunda Edición, 1999 , 2000 .

[26]  Anders Eriksson,et al.  Advances in Engineering Software , 2010 .

[27]  Nejib Smaoui,et al.  A new approach combining Karhunen-Loéve decomposition and artificial neural network for estimating tight gas sand permeability , 1997 .

[28]  Zhiye Zhao,et al.  Design of structural modular neural networks with genetic algorithm , 2003 .

[29]  B. Kvasov Cubic Spline Interpolation , 2000 .

[30]  Mary M. Poulton,et al.  Neural networks as an intelligence amplification tool: A review of applications , 2002 .

[31]  Alan V. Oppenheim,et al.  Discrete-Time Signal Pro-cessing , 1989 .

[32]  Masoud Nikravesh,et al.  Intelligent reservoir characterization (IRESC) , 2003, IEEE International Conference on Industrial Informatics, 2003. INDIN 2003. Proceedings..

[33]  Lorraine E. Lisiecki,et al.  Application of dynamic programming to the correlation of paleoclimate records , 2002 .

[34]  JiangNan,et al.  Design of structural modular neural networks with genetic algorithm , 2003 .

[35]  A. A. Ghatol,et al.  Modular neural network approach for short term flood forecasting a comparative study , 2010 .

[36]  Pejman Tahmasebi,et al.  A fast and independent architecture of artificial neural network for permeability prediction , 2012 .

[37]  Hans B. Helle,et al.  Determination of facies from well logs using modular neural networks , 2002, Petroleum Geoscience.

[38]  Gao Shang,et al.  Cubic spline interpolation on new condition , 2011 .

[39]  M. Reza Rezaee,et al.  Petrophysical data prediction from seismic attributes using committee fuzzy inference system , 2009, Comput. Geosci..

[40]  Simon Haykin,et al.  Neural Networks: A Comprehensive Foundation , 1998 .

[41]  Kishan G. Mehrotra,et al.  Efficient classification for multiclass problems using modular neural networks , 1995, IEEE Trans. Neural Networks.

[42]  Oscar Castillo,et al.  Interval type-2 fuzzy logic and modular neural networks for face recognition applications , 2009, Appl. Soft Comput..

[43]  G. M. Hamada,et al.  Neural network prediction of porosity and permeability of heterogeneous gas sand reservoirs using NMR and conventional logs , 2010 .