Small Mission Design for Testing In-Orbit an Electrodynamic Tether Deorbiting System

The need to limit the population of artificial debris in near-Earth space motivates the development of efficient deorbiting propulsion systems. Electrodynamic tethers offer a valid and attractive alternative to conventional chemical thrusters because they impose a penalty in terms of deorbiting time rather than additional launch mass. A low-cost demonstration mission is designed, where a reduced-scale deorbiting system will be carried, deployed, and controlled by a microsatellite. Numerical simulations show that the proposed configuration of the electrodynamic system allows, even in absence of active tether current control, to maintain a stable tether attitude motion. This is obtained through a careful combination of bare and insulated tether segments. When active current control is applied, the tether libration angles are bounded to within 10 deg. The closed-loop control laws make use of the in-plane and out-of-plane libration angles and rates, which are estimated through a newly developed extended Kalman filter. The estimator’s measurements are provided by two three-axis magnetometers mounted on the spacecraft structure and at the lower tether endpoint, respectively. It is shown that this microsystem is able to deorbit a low-Earth-orbit carrier spacecraft in about two months, demonstrating salient features of tether technologies and associated electrodynamic effects.

[1]  B. Bertotti Quantum mechanics and the uniqueness of the world , 1960 .

[2]  Thomas S. Denney,et al.  Real time estimator for control of an orbiting single tether system , 1991 .

[3]  Thomas S. Denney,et al.  On state estimation for an orbiting single tether system , 1991 .

[4]  Joseph Carroll,et al.  SEDS deployer design and flight performance , 1993 .

[5]  Eduardo Ahedo,et al.  Bare wire anodes for electrodynamic tethers , 1993 .

[6]  M. Dobrowolny,et al.  A technical overview of TSS-1: The first Tethered-Satellite system mission , 1994 .

[7]  Jesús Peláez On the dynamics of the deployment of a tether from an orbiter—I. Basic equations , 1995 .

[8]  Jesús Peláez On the dynamics of the deployment of a tether from an orbiter—Part II. Exponential deployment , 1995 .

[9]  Robert P. Hoyt,et al.  FAILSAFE MULTILINE HOYTETHER LIFETIMES , 1995 .

[10]  Joseph A. Carroll,et al.  Tethers for Small Satellite Applications , 1995 .

[11]  Les Johnson,et al.  Propulsive Small Expendable Deployer System (ProSEDS) Space Demonstration , 1998 .

[12]  Robert P. Hoyt,et al.  APPLICATION OF THE TERMINATOR TETHER™ ELECTRODYNAMIC DRAG TECHNOLOGY TO THE DEORBIT OF CONSTELLATION SPACECRAFT , 1998 .

[13]  C. Bonifazi,et al.  The TSS‐1R Mission: Overview and scientific context , 1998 .

[14]  Deanna L. Mains,et al.  Tether satellite system collision study , 1999 .

[15]  Robert P. Hoyt,et al.  Performance of the Terminator Tether for autonomous deorbit of LEO spacecraft , 1999 .

[16]  M. Dobrowolny,et al.  Deorbiting with electrodynamic tethers: comparison between different tether configurations , 1999 .

[17]  E. C. Lorenzini,et al.  A New Kind of Dynamic Instability in Electrodynamic Tethers , 2000 .

[18]  R. Forward,et al.  The Terminator Tether - Autonomous deorbit of LEO spacecraft for space debris mitigation , 2000 .

[19]  Michiel Kruijff,et al.  Tethers and debris mitigation , 2001 .

[20]  Luciano Iess,et al.  EDOARD: A tethered device for efficient Electrodynamic De-Orbiting of LEO spacecraft , 2001 .

[21]  Luciano Iess,et al.  EDOARD: an electrodynamic tether device for efficient spacecraft de-orbiting , 2001 .

[22]  Luciano Iess,et al.  Stability and control of electrodynamic tethers for de-orbiting applications , 2001 .

[23]  Jeffrey Slostad,et al.  THE RETRIEVE MICROSATELLITE TETHER DEORBIT EXPERIMENT , 2002 .

[24]  Claudio Bruno,et al.  satellite de-orbiting by means of electrodynamic tethers part i: general concepts and requirements , 2002 .

[25]  M. Dobrowolny,et al.  Lateral oscillations of an electrodynamic tether , 2002 .

[26]  Eduardo Ahedo,et al.  Analysis of Bare-Tether Systems for Deorbiting Low-Earth-Orbit Satellites , 2002 .

[27]  Russell P. Patera Method for Calculating Collision Probability Between a Satellite and a Space Tether , 2002 .

[28]  Claudio Bruno,et al.  SATELLITE DE-ORBITING BY MEANS OF ELECTRODYNAMIC TETHERS PART II: SYSTEM CONFIGURATION AND PERFORMANCE☆ , 2002 .

[29]  M. Dobrowolny Linear stability of electrodynamic tethers , 2002 .

[30]  Jesus Pelaez Self balanced electrodynamic tethers , 2004 .

[31]  Enrico Troiani,et al.  The microsatellite research program at Università di Bologna , 2005 .

[32]  Jesus Pelaez,et al.  Generator Regime of Self-Balanced Electrodynamic Bare Tethers , 2006 .

[33]  Mark A. Minor,et al.  Automated tether management system for extravehicular activities , 2007, J. Field Robotics.