Defining the Scale to Build Complex Networks with a 40-Year Norwegian Intraplate Seismicity Dataset

We present a new complex network-based study focused on intraplate earthquakes recorded in southern Norway during the period 1980–2020. One of the most recognized limitations of spatial complex network procedures and analyses concerns the definition of adequate cell size, which is the focus of this approach. In the present study, we analyze the influence of observational errors of hypocentral and epicentral locations of seismic events in the construction of a complex network, looking for the best cell size to build it and to develop a basis for interpreting the results in terms of the structure of the complex network in this seismic region. We focus the analysis on the degree distribution of the complex networks. We observed a strong result of the cell size for the slope of the degree distribution of the nodes, called the critical exponent γ. Based on the Abe–Suzuki method, the slope (γ) showed a negligible variation between the construction of 3- and 2-dimensional complex networks. The results were also very similar for a complex network built with subsets of seismic events. These results suggest a weak influence of observational errors measured for the coordinates latitude, longitude, and depth in the outcomes obtained with this particular methodology and for this high-quality dataset. These results imply stable behavior of the complex network, which shows a structure of hubs for small values of the cell size and a more homogeneous degree distribution when the cell size increases. In all the analyses, the γ parameter showed smaller values of the error bars for greater values of the cell size. To keep the structure of hubs and small error bars, a better range of the side sizes was determined to be between 8 to 16 km. From now on, these values can be used as the most stable cell sizes to perform any kind of study concerning complex network studies in southern Norway.

[1]  D. Pastén,et al.  Multifractal time evolution for intraplate earthquakes recorded in southern Norway during 1980–2021 , 2023, Chaos, Solitons & Fractals.

[2]  D. Pastén,et al.  Assigning Degrees of Stochasticity to Blazar Light Curves in the Radio Band Using Complex Networks , 2022, Entropy.

[3]  Shumaila Javaid,et al.  An Adaptive Hierarchical Network Model for Studying the Structure of Economic Network , 2022, Entropy.

[4]  D. Pastén,et al.  Complex Networks and the b-Value Relationship Using the Degree Probability Distribution: The Case of Three Mega-Earthquakes in Chile in the Last Decade , 2022, Entropy.

[5]  V. Muñoz,et al.  Analysis of pulsating variable stars using the visibility graph algorithm , 2021, PloS one.

[6]  N. Sarlis,et al.  Estimating the Epicenter of an Impending Strong Earthquake by Combining the Seismicity Order Parameter Variability Analysis with Earthquake Networks and Nowcasting: Application in the Eastern Mediterranean , 2021, Applied Sciences.

[7]  S. Gradmann,et al.  Crustal structure and intraplate seismicity in Nordland, Northern Norway: Insight from Seismic Tomography , 2021, Geophysical Journal International.

[8]  C. Pavez,et al.  Frictional energy patterns related to the temperature increases due to intraplate seismicity, southern Norway, 2000–2019 catalogue , 2021 .

[9]  L. Telesca,et al.  Analysis of Time Dynamical Features in Intraplate Versus Interplate Seismicity: The Case Study of Iquique Area (Chile) , 2020, Pure and Applied Geophysics.

[10]  Leonardo F. S. Scabini,et al.  Social interaction layers in complex networks for the dynamical epidemic modeling of COVID-19 in Brazil , 2020, Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications.

[11]  Hadi Esmaeilpour Moghadam,et al.  Complex networks analysis in Iran stock market: The application of centrality , 2019, Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications.

[12]  N. Sarlis,et al.  Minima of the fluctuations of the order parameter of seismicity and earthquake networks based on similar activity patterns , 2019, Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications.

[13]  Benjamín Toledo,et al.  Time series analysis in earthquake complex networks. , 2018, Chaos.

[14]  Dimitris Kugiumtzis,et al.  Testing the structure of earthquake networks from multivariate time series of successive main shocks in Greece , 2018, Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications.

[15]  José Rogan,et al.  Time-Based Network Analysis Before and After the $$M_w$$Mw  8.3 Illapel Earthquake 2015 Chile , 2016 .

[16]  C. Kreemer,et al.  A comparison of strain rates and seismicity for Fennoscandia: depth dependency of deformation from glacial isostatic adjustment , 2015 .

[17]  S. Hung,et al.  Multiscale, finite-frequency P and S tomography of the upper mantle in the southwestern Fennoscandian Shield , 2015 .

[18]  M. Johnsen Seismic hazard in Norway due to large earthquakes , 2015 .

[19]  P. Varotsos,et al.  Study of the temporal correlations in the magnitude time series before major earthquakes in Japan , 2014 .

[20]  M. Behm,et al.  Three-dimensional seismic model of crustal structure in Southern Norway , 2014 .

[21]  L. Guzmán-Vargas,et al.  Earthquake magnitude time series: scaling behavior of visibility networks , 2013 .

[22]  V. Maupin,et al.  A Proterozoic boundary in southern Norway revealed by joint-inversion of P-receiver functions and surface waves , 2013 .

[23]  Awadhesh Prasad,et al.  Visibility-Graph Analysis of the Solar Wind Velocity , 2013, 1306.1899.

[24]  A. Köhler,et al.  Crustal and uppermost mantle structure of southern Norway: results from surface wave analysis of ambient seismic noise and earthquake data , 2012 .

[25]  Luciano Telesca,et al.  Analysis of seismic sequences by using the method of visibility graph , 2012 .

[26]  S. Abe,et al.  Universalities of earthquake-network characteristics , 2011 .

[27]  Shlomo Havlin,et al.  Earthquake networks based on similar activity patterns. , 2011, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[28]  W. Stratford,et al.  Seismic structure and composition of the crust beneath the southern Scandes, Norway , 2011 .

[29]  W. Stratford,et al.  Crustal structure and composition of the Oslo Graben, Norway , 2011 .

[30]  A. Tryggvason,et al.  New Moho Map for onshore southern Norway , 2009 .

[31]  K. Atakan,et al.  Tectonic Processes in the Jan Mayen Fracture Zone Based on Earthquake Occurrence and Bathymetry , 2007 .

[32]  Norikazu Suzuki,et al.  Complex-network description of seismicity , 2006 .

[33]  J. Thiery,et al.  Complex networks orchestrate epithelial–mesenchymal transitions , 2006, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[34]  P. Varotsos,et al.  Similarity of fluctuations in correlated systems: the case of seismicity. , 2005, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[35]  Funabashi,et al.  Scale-free network of earthquakes , 2002, cond-mat/0210289.

[36]  P. Varotsos,et al.  Long-range correlations in the electric signals that precede rupture. , 2002, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[37]  H. Bungum,et al.  New Seismic Zoning Maps for Norway, the North Sea, and the United Kingdom , 2000 .

[38]  R. Albert,et al.  The large-scale organization of metabolic networks , 2000, Nature.

[39]  C. Lindholm,et al.  Postglacial uplift, neotectonics and seismicity in Fennoscandia , 2000 .

[40]  Albert,et al.  Emergence of scaling in random networks , 1999, Science.

[41]  Duncan J. Watts,et al.  Collective dynamics of ‘small-world’ networks , 1998, Nature.

[42]  J. Faleide,et al.  A stretching model for the Oslo Rift , 1992 .

[43]  B. O. Ruud,et al.  Tomographic estimates of sub-Moho seismic velocities in Fennoscandia and structural implications , 1991 .

[44]  Pathways Between Social Science and Computational Social Science , 2021, Computational Social Sciences.

[45]  K. Kaski,et al.  Modeling the Complex Network of Social Interactions , 2020 .

[46]  B. Jacobsen,et al.  Upper-mantle velocities below the Scandinavian Mountains from P- and S-wave traveltime tomography , 2017 .

[47]  A. Köhler,et al.  Directionality analysis and Rayleigh wave tomography of ambient seismic noise in southern Norway , 2011 .

[48]  N. Gulbahce,et al.  Network medicine: a network-based approach to human disease , 2010, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[49]  R. Bøe,et al.  Mesozoic sediments and structures onshore Norway and in the coastal zone , 2010 .

[50]  C. Pascal,et al.  New aeromagnetic and gravity compilations from Norway and adjacent areas: methods and applications , 2010 .

[51]  T. Tiira,et al.  The Moho depth map of the European Plate , 2009 .

[52]  L. Ottemöller,et al.  The crustal structure of Norway from inversion of teleseismic receiver functions , 2003 .

[53]  Nicholas V. Sarlis,et al.  Seismic electric signals and seismicity: on a tentative interrelation between their spectral , 2002 .

[54]  G. Grünthal,et al.  Probabilistic Seismic Hazard Assessment (Horizontal PGA) for Fennoscandia Using the Logic Tree Approach for Regionalization and Nonregionalization Models , 2001 .

[55]  A. Andrew,et al.  Emergence of Scaling in Random Networks , 1999 .

[56]  P. Erdos,et al.  On the evolution of random graphs , 1984 .