Relationship Between Relative Velocity Detection and Driver Response Times in Vehicle Following Situations

Several previous studies report driver response times when responding to a lead vehicle. There have also been other studies that examined and measured the ability of drivers to detect the relative velocity of a lead vehicle. This study attempts to determine how the relative velocity detection threshold and driver response times fit together. There may be a significant difference between the times at which a lead vehicle is visible versus when it is perceivable as an immediate hazard. This research involved two parts; the first analyzes the raw data reported in previous research. The second part involved measuring responses of subjects using a laptop simulator. The goal of both parts of this research was to compare the subtended angular velocity [SAV] with the response times of drivers to determine if there is a point (threshold) at which response times level off at a fast rate. As theorized, driver response times remained high until the SAV of the lead vehicle increased to over 0.006 radians per second (in Part I) and to 0.0066 r/s (Part II), after which response times remained relatively fast. An in-depth analysis of driver response to a lead vehicle is discussed.

[1]  Leonard C. Mead,et al.  HUMAN FACTORS IN ENGINEERING DESIGN , 1947 .

[2]  Paul L. Olson,et al.  Driver judgments of relative car velocities. , 1961 .

[3]  A. Crawford,et al.  THE PERCEPTION OF LIGHT SIGNALS: THE EFFECT OF THE NUMBER OF IRRELEVANT LIGHTS , 1962 .

[4]  A. Crawford,et al.  THE PERCEPTION OF LIGHT SIGNALS : THE EFFECT OF MIXING FLASHING AND STEADY IRRELEVANT LIGHTS , 1963 .

[5]  Lucien Duckstein,et al.  Variable Perception Time in Car Following and Its Effect on Model Stability , 1970 .

[6]  Rudolf G. Mortimer.  The Value of an Accelerator Release Signal , 1971 .

[7]  G. Johansson,et al.  Drivers' Brake Reaction Times , 1971, Human factors.

[8]  Ronald R. Mourant,et al.  Strategies of Visual Search by Novice and Experienced Drivers , 1972 .

[9]  Wiel H. Janssen.  Driver's Inability to Judge Important Parameters of Leading Vehicle Movement at Night , 1977 .

[10]  Conrad L. Kraft.  A Psychophysical Contribution to Air Safety: Simulator Studies of Visual Illusions in Night Visual Approaches , 1978 .

[11]  A J Fisher,et al.  THE EFFECT OF PRESENCE LIGHTS ON THE DETECTION OF CHANGE OF VEHICLE HEADWAY , 1978 .

[12]  H W Leibowitz,et al.  Grade Crossing Accidents and Human Factors Engineering , 1985 .

[13]  H Lunenfeld,et al.  DRIVER EXPECTANCY IN HIGHWAY DESIGN AND TRAFFIC OPERATIONS. FINAL REPORT , 1986 .

[14]  R. Mortimer.  Perceptual Factors in Rear-End Crashes , 1990 .

[15]  Leonard Evans,et al.  Traffic Safety and the Driver , 1991 .

[16]  Eugene Farber,et al.  Forensic Aspects of Driver Perception and Response , 1996 .

[17]  E R Hoffmann,et al.  Scaling of relative velocity between vehicles. , 1996, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[18]  G Steinberg,et al.  Driver Backing-Behavior Research: Implications for Backup Warning Devices , 1997 .

[19]  Louis Tijerina,et al.  Analytical Evaluation of Warning Onset Rules for Lane Change Crash Avoidance Systems , 1997 .

[20]  W. van Winsum.  PREFERRED TIME HEADWAY IN CAR-FOLLOWING AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES IN PERCEPTUAL-MOTOR SKILLS '" , 1998 .

[21]  H Summala,et al.  Driving experience and perception of the lead car's braking when looking at in-car targets. , 1998, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[22]  Mary Jo Kane,et al.  INVESTIGATING DIFFERENCES IN DRIVER ACCIDENT INVOLVEMENT: THE INFLUENCE OF PERCEPTUAL MOTOR COMPETENCE, COMPETITIVE ATHLETICS, AND GENDER , 1999 .

[23]  H Summala,et al.  Cognitive load and detection thresholds in car following situations: safety implications for using mobile (cellular) telephones while driving. , 1999, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[24]  Heikki Summala,et al.  DETECTION THRESHOLDS IN CAR FOLLOWING SITUATIONS AND PERIPHERAL VISION: IMPLICATIONS FOR POSITIONING OF VISUALLY DEMANDING IN-CAR DISPLAYS , 1999 .

[25]  A P Ginsburg,et al.  Forensic Aspects of Vision and Highway Safety , 2000 .

[26]  Lisa Marie Schreiner.  An Investigation of the Effectiveness of A Strobe Light As An Imminent Rear Warning Signal , 2000 .

[27]  Robert Gray,et al.  Risky driving behavior: a consequence of motion adaptation for visually guided motor action. , 2000 .

[28]  A L Burgett,et al.  REAR-END COLLISION EVENTS: CHARACTERIZATION OF IMPENDING CRASHES , 2001 .

[29]  G R Preziotti,et al.  ALERT ALGORITHM DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM: NHTSA REAR-END COLLISION ALERT ALGORITHM , 2002 .

[30]  Robert E. Dewar,et al.  Human factors in traffic safety , 2002 .

[31]  Jeffrey W. Muttart,et al.  Development and Evaluation of Driver Response Time Predictors Based upon Meta Analysis , 2003 .

[32]  Suzanne E. Lee,et al.  A COMPREHENSIVE EXAMINATION OF NATURALISTIC LANE-CHANGES , 2004 .

[33]  Michael J. Flannagan,et al.  RISK OF FATAL REAR-END COLLISIONS: IS THERE MORE TO IT THAN ATTENTION? , 2005 .

[34]  Jeffrey W Muttart.  Estimating Driver Response Times , 2005 .