The Tomato Brown Rugose Fruit Virus Movement Protein Gene Is a Novel Microbial Source Tracking Marker

Human exposure to fecal contamination in the environment can cause transmission of infectious diseases. Microbial source tracking (MST) can identify sources of fecal contamination so that contamination can be remediated and human exposures can be reduced. ABSTRACT Microbial source tracking (MST) identifies sources of fecal contamination in the environment using host-associated fecal markers. While there are numerous bacterial MST markers that can be used herein, there are few such viral markers. Here, we designed and tested novel viral MST markers based on tomato brown rugose fruit virus (ToBRFV) genomes. We assembled eight nearly complete genomes of ToBRFV from wastewater and stool samples from the San Francisco Bay Area in the United States. Next, we developed two novel probe-based reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR) assays based on conserved regions of the ToBRFV genome and tested the markers’ sensitivities and specificities using human and non-human animal stool as well as wastewater. The ToBRFV markers are sensitive and specific; in human stool and wastewater, they are more prevalent and abundant than a commonly used viral marker, the pepper mild mottle virus (PMMoV) coat protein (CP) gene. We used the assays to detect fecal contamination in urban stormwater samples and found that the ToBRFV markers matched cross-assembly phage (crAssphage), an established viral MST marker, in prevalence across samples. Taken together, these results indicate that ToBRFV is a promising viral human-associated MST marker. IMPORTANCE Human exposure to fecal contamination in the environment can cause transmission of infectious diseases. Microbial source tracking (MST) can identify sources of fecal contamination so that contamination can be remediated and human exposures can be reduced. MST requires the use of host-associated MST markers. Here, we designed and tested novel MST markers from genomes of tomato brown rugose fruit virus (ToBRFV). The markers are sensitive and specific to human stool and highly abundant in human stool and wastewater samples.

[1]  S. Kuersten,et al.  Quantifying bias introduced by sample collection in relative and absolute microbiome measurements , 2023, Nature biotechnology.

[2]  Thomas L. Madden,et al.  Database resources of the National Center for Biotechnology Information in 2023 , 2022, Nucleic Acids Res..

[3]  K. Whiteson,et al.  Sequencing and Variant Detection of Eight Abundant Plant-Infecting Tobamoviruses across Southern California Wastewater , 2022, bioRxiv.

[4]  Aiming Wang,et al.  Tomato brown rugose fruit virus: An emerging and rapidly spreading plant RNA virus that threatens tomato production worldwide , 2022, Molecular plant pathology.

[5]  A. Topol,et al.  High Throughput RNA Extraction and PCR Inhibitor Removal of Settled Solids for Wastewater Surveillance of SARS-CoV-2 RNA v2 , 2021 .

[6]  A. Boehm,et al.  Viral pathogens in urban stormwater runoff: Occurrence and removal via vegetated biochar-amended biofilters. , 2021, Water research.

[7]  A. Bhatt,et al.  Standardized preservation, extraction and quantification techniques for detection of fecal SARS-CoV-2 RNA , 2021, Nature Communications.

[8]  D. Brossard,et al.  SARS-CoV-2 Wastewater Surveillance for Public Health Action , 2021, Emerging infectious diseases.

[9]  K. Whiteson,et al.  RNA viromics of Southern California wastewater and detection of SARS-CoV-2 single nucleotide variants. , 2021, medRxiv.

[10]  D. Vugia,et al.  High frequency, high throughput quantification of SARS-CoV-2 RNA in wastewater settled solids at eight publicly owned treatment works in Northern California shows strong association with COVID-19 incidence , 2021, medRxiv.

[11]  Jeseth Delgado Vela,et al.  Standardizing data reporting in the research community to enhance the utility of open data for SARS-CoV-2 wastewater surveillance. , 2021, Environmental science : water research & technology.

[12]  A. Topol,et al.  Effect of storage conditions on SARS-CoV-2 RNA quantification in wastewater solids , 2021, medRxiv.

[13]  A. Scheidegger,et al.  Wastewater-Based Estimation of the Effective Reproductive Number of SARS-CoV-2 , 2021, medRxiv.

[14]  A. Topol,et al.  High Throughput RNA Extraction and PCR Inhibitor Removal of Settled Solids for Wastewater Surveillance of SARS-CoV-2 RNA v1 , 2021 .

[15]  A. Topol High Throughput pre-analytical processing of wastewater settled solids for SARS-CoV-2 RNA analyses v1 , 2021 .

[16]  K. Wigginton,et al.  One-Step RT-ddPCR for Detection of SARS-CoV-2, Bovine Coronavirus, and PMMoV RNA in RNA Derived from Wastewater or Primary Settled Solids v2  v1 , 2021, protocols.io.

[17]  J. Banfield,et al.  inStrain profiles population microdiversity from metagenomic data and sensitively detects shared microbial strains , 2021, Nature Biotechnology.

[18]  N. Kyrpides,et al.  CheckV assesses the quality and completeness of metagenome-assembled viral genomes , 2020, Nature Biotechnology.

[19]  J. Banfield,et al.  Genome Sequencing of Sewage Detects Regionally Prevalent SARS-CoV-2 Variants , 2020, mBio.

[20]  Katyann Graham,et al.  One-Step RT-ddPCR for Detection of SARS-CoV-2, Bovine Coronavirus, and PMMoV RNA in RNA Derived from Wastewater or Primary Settled Solids  v1 , 2020 .

[21]  Jim F Huggett,et al.  The Digital MIQE Guidelines Update: Minimum Information for Publication of Quantitative Digital PCR Experiments for 2020. , 2020, Clinical chemistry.

[22]  K. Eric Wommack,et al.  Iroki: automatic customization and visualization of phylogenetic trees , 2020, PeerJ.

[23]  Jennifer Lu,et al.  Improved metagenomic analysis with Kraken 2 , 2019, Genome Biology.

[24]  Stan J. J. Brouns,et al.  Global phylogeography and ancient evolution of the widespread human gut virus crAssphage , 2019, bioRxiv.

[25]  J. Jofre,et al.  Determination of crAssphage in water samples and applicability for tracking human faecal pollution , 2017, Microbial biotechnology.

[26]  Takashi Yoshida,et al.  ViPTree: the viral proteomic tree server , 2017, Bioinform..

[27]  P. Pevzner,et al.  metaSPAdes: a new versatile metagenomic assembler. , 2017, Genome research.

[28]  Jane Kuypers,et al.  Applications of Digital PCR for Clinical Microbiology , 2017, Journal of Clinical Microbiology.

[29]  Simon R. Harris,et al.  SNP-sites: rapid efficient extraction of SNPs from multi-FASTA alignments , 2016, bioRxiv.

[30]  Niklas Krumm,et al.  One Codex: A Sensitive and Accurate Data Platform for Genomic Microbial Identification , 2015, bioRxiv.

[31]  C. Huttenhower,et al.  Relating the metatranscriptome and metagenome of the human gut , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[32]  Dan Wang,et al.  Performance of forty-one microbial source tracking methods: a twenty-seven lab evaluation study. , 2013, Water research.

[33]  Steven L Salzberg,et al.  Fast gapped-read alignment with Bowtie 2 , 2012, Nature Methods.

[34]  Linda K. Dick,et al.  Genetic Markers for Rapid PCR-Based Identification of Gull, Canada Goose, Duck, and Chicken Fecal Contamination in Water , 2011, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[35]  A. Boehm,et al.  Wrack promotes the persistence of fecal indicator bacteria in marine sands and seawater. , 2011, FEMS microbiology ecology.

[36]  Marcel Martin Cutadapt removes adapter sequences from high-throughput sequencing reads , 2011 .

[37]  A. Boehm,et al.  Enterococcus species distribution among human and animal hosts using multiplex PCR , 2010, Journal of applied microbiology.

[38]  C. Desnues,et al.  Pepper Mild Mottle Virus, a Plant Virus Associated with Specific Immune Responses, Fever, Abdominal Pains, and Pruritus in Humans , 2010, PloS one.

[39]  Miriam L. Land,et al.  Trace: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Prodigal: Prokaryotic Gene Recognition and Translation Initiation Site Identification Recommended Citation Prodigal: Prokaryotic Gene Recognition and Translation Initiation Site Identification , 2022 .

[40]  Mano Sivaganesan,et al.  Performance Assessment PCR-Based Assays Targeting Bacteroidales Genetic Markers of Bovine Fecal Pollution , 2010, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[41]  M. Breitbart,et al.  Pepper Mild Mottle Virus as an Indicator of Fecal Pollution , 2009, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[42]  A. Boehm,et al.  Growth of Enterococci in Unaltered, Unseeded Beach Sands Subjected to Tidal Wetting , 2009, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[43]  Pierre Hecq,et al.  Drinking Water Regulations , 2006 .

[44]  S. Ishii,et al.  Population structure, persistence, and seasonality of autochthonous Escherichia coli in temperate, coastal forest soil from a Great Lakes watershed. , 2006, Environmental microbiology.

[45]  R. Whitman,et al.  Occurrence of Escherichia coli and Enterococci in Cladophora (Chlorophyta) in Nearshore Water and Beach Sand of Lake Michigan , 2003, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[46]  R. Hayden,et al.  Applications of Digital PCR in Clinical Microbiology , 2018 .

[47]  S Rozen,et al.  Primer3 on the WWW for general users and for biologist programmers. , 2000, Methods in molecular biology.